1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Is T-Mac's extension more than current max players receive?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by T-2, Nov 1, 2004.

  1. T-2

    T-2 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2002
    Messages:
    735
    Likes Received:
    8
    [Disclaimer: when it comes to CBA/salaries/Salary Cap I am no expert, and I didn't stay at a Holiday Inn Express either.]

    I didn't want this question lost in the stale "McGrady signed" thread either...

    Isn't T-Mac about to be paid more than max players currently get under the CBA? (I know Garnett was grandfathered under his old salary, to the salary cap detriment of his team). Gasol & Kirilenko are getting 6/86M, which would probably be a bit less than 20M/yr on the 6th year of their contracts if I am not mistaken, and yet T-Mac is getting 24.1M on his 7th, which seems a bit higher raise than is allowable. Is this another case of a grandfathered contract which is higher for salary cap purposes?

    Much of the excitement about getting T-Mac was in the fact that we were getting good value for our max contract whereas Francis yielded poor value on his. However, not knowing T-Mac's salary status, I assumed he was making max money and not max-plus money.

    I am concerned with luxury tax implications of this (though CBA may soon be different)...
     
    #1 T-2, Nov 1, 2004
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2004
  2. gucci888

    gucci888 Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    17,227
    Likes Received:
    6,573
    Garnett, Duncan, Kidd, Shaq, Houston, and Kobe (I think), are all getting max plus dollars. I think it is safe to throw TMac into that status.
     
  3. Pat

    Pat Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2002
    Messages:
    2,577
    Likes Received:
    658
    A team can resign its own players at some percentage increases. Add 6 years on to TMac's contract and (apparently) you come to the $24.1 mil. So, yea I guess you can call that grandfathered.
     
  4. KeepKenny

    KeepKenny Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2000
    Messages:
    2,721
    Likes Received:
    14
    Tmac signed a 7 year deal with orlando for the max. He played there for 4 years, has 3 years left on it. Now, we just tacked on 4 more years. So thats 11 years of basketball, starting at the maximum starting salary. Factor in the maximum raises over a period of 10 years or so, and the dollars get pretty big.
     
  5. T-2

    T-2 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2002
    Messages:
    735
    Likes Received:
    8
    So it is just at the max, only we made it an eleven year max contract with max allowable raises? If so, I didn't know that extending the contract resulted in grandfathering the baseline in. (I thought you had to reset the max baseline each time you extended). Thanks KK.

    Anyway, I think that it went under the radar for alot of us that what it would take to keep T-Mac would require such a mammoth salary cap drain that would make the Francis trade less in our favor than I originally thought.

    I had hopes that we could reel in a third "near-star caliber" player, but each year could make that less and less likely as T-Mac's salary grows ever larger relative to the cap. I hate the thought of having bargain basement fodder forever surrounding the big two.

    Fortunately, T-Mac's star power will still give us trade value above and beyond what his on-court contributions may be, at least for a while. Let's hope this experiment works, but I can't help but feel much less enthusiastic now that the probability is much reduced of being able to add quality players around them, and that each year it will be increasingly difficult as T-Mac's salary percentage relative to the team salary will increase. We truly are putting all our eggs in one basket here as long as we are paying his contract. Scary.

    Well, best to get the doom and gloom out of the way before the season starts, anyway.
     
  6. NIKEstrad

    NIKEstrad Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2000
    Messages:
    10,230
    Likes Received:
    4,235
    A.) I broke down McGrady's extension possibilities in the middle of the summer. It's understood that TMac would make his max, and his max, being as he's already had one max contract and isn't anywhere near a retirement age, is bigger than others'.

    B.) :rolleyes: This is where the mid level exception and drafting well come into play. Garnett's mammoth contract sure stopped the T-Wolves from acquiring Sprewell and Cassell in the same offseason.
     
  7. KeepKenny

    KeepKenny Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2000
    Messages:
    2,721
    Likes Received:
    14
    Yes, the MLE is definately important because that is the best way to sign new role players. Your hopes of a third star were just a little unrealistic, at least until Boki comes into his own. ;)
     

Share This Page