1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Is Kobe better than TMAC?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by tsunami, May 25, 2008.

?

Is Kobe better than TMAC?

  1. Yes, Kobe is better

    350 vote(s)
    84.1%
  2. No, TMAC is better

    66 vote(s)
    15.9%
  1. tsunami

    tsunami Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2006
    Messages:
    3,095
    Likes Received:
    1
    On his prime, would you pick TMAC or Kobe?
     
  2. aussie rocket

    aussie rocket Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2006
    Messages:
    6,096
    Likes Received:
    201
    shampoo is better....
     
  3. sTeKcOr22

    sTeKcOr22 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,216
    Likes Received:
    49
    In Orlando, T-Mac is what you will call the "Beast".
     
  4. Angkor Wat

    Angkor Wat Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    13,150
    Likes Received:
    997
    I'm going to be a homer and say T-Mac is better.
     
  5. Aznoob

    Aznoob Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,564
    Likes Received:
    9
    Well, the OP said in his PRIME.

    In his PRIME, TMac is so much better than Kobe. TMac with a bunch of scrubs > Kobe with a bunch of scrubs.

    Imagine if Shaq had stayed with the Magic. TMac + Shaq = dynasty for many years.
     
  6. bigballerj

    bigballerj Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Messages:
    1,785
    Likes Received:
    9
    Kobe's prime is slighty better than T-Mac's due to the fact that Kobe being a much better 1 on 1 defender. Offensively they are pretty much dead-even.
     
  7. ChrisBosh

    ChrisBosh Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2006
    Messages:
    4,324
    Likes Received:
    294
    Kobe is a winner.
     
  8. sook

    sook Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,399
    Likes Received:
    0
    In orlando he was a back to back scoring champ, TMAC
     
  9. Nice Rollin

    Nice Rollin Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    11,858
    Likes Received:
    321
    in his prime? McGrady
     
  10. Nice Rollin

    Nice Rollin Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    11,858
    Likes Received:
    321
    with Shaq


    Tmac is a loser with.....john amachei? and Juwan Howard? and Yao who cant stay healthy?
     
  11. astros148

    astros148 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,994
    Likes Received:
    14
    lol at posting this on a rockets forum.

    Kobe pwned in his prime and is a much better player then tmac, i love tmac to death but some of the anti kobe hate on these forums are just hilarous. Hes the best player in the nba currently and ill rather have kobe then tmac any day.
     
  12. astros148

    astros148 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,994
    Likes Received:
    14
    yup it was yao's fault tmac went scoreless in teh 4th quarter and couldnt hit his free throws to save his life.
     
  13. sook

    sook Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,399
    Likes Received:
    0
    What game are you talking about? The games he didn't score in the 4th were the first 2 vs the jazz when rafer wasn't here and he only shot poorly from the FT line this year...how are you equating yao into this when he was injured?

    Its Yao's fault he lost 4 rebounds to boozer in the final minute of the game last year game 7, thats what lost us the series so shutup! If you have noticed Yao never comes up big in the 4th
     
  14. txppratt

    txppratt Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2006
    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    296
    even in tmacs prime, he didn't have the killer instinct kobe does.

    so while he has a few inches in length and some amazing athleticism, kobe's talent and killer insticts wins in a landslide.

    this is a 'no contest.'
     
  15. astros148

    astros148 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,994
    Likes Received:
    14
    lol at blaming yao. Yao isnt the captain of the team, yao isnt making 22 mil a year. It isnt rafer's fault that tmac was scoreless in the 4th quarter, superstars step it up in the clutch. And tmac only shot poor from teh FT line this year?

    lol tmac has never shot 80% from the FT line in his career, it wasnt only this past year, hes always been a bad ft shooter.


    Dont get me wrong, im a huge tmac supporter, but some of you guys support him never the less because hes a rocket. Kobe is and was a better player then tmac.
     
  16. nycundaground

    nycundaground Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2006
    Messages:
    577
    Likes Received:
    7
    Why would you even come up with that question. Its evident what the answer is .
     
  17. tested911

    tested911 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2002
    Messages:
    3,643
    Likes Received:
    127
    Is this a joke? Kobe all the way man.. Just look at Kobe's defense.
     
  18. sook

    sook Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,399
    Likes Received:
    0
    What ? Did you even watch the games? TMAC was playing point the first 2 and doing it all, its not a 1 man team, wow. In his "prime" was the question and its evident the answer is tmac
     
  19. sook

    sook Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,399
    Likes Received:
    0
    Anyone that thinks Kobe was better in their primes probably never saw any magic games.



    <object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6mq4tveJxI0&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6mq4tveJxI0&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
     
  20. clos4life

    clos4life Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    Messages:
    12,396
    Likes Received:
    14,784
    T-Mac in his prime. Unfortunately, his prime was relatively speaking, errr...short.
     

Share This Page