http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/14/congress.democrats/index.html -- Murtha decries 'swift boat-style' attacks on ethics WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Anti-war Congressman John Murtha, who is the new House leader's pick for majority leader, fended off what he called "swift boat-style attacks" on his ethics record Tuesday. The Pennsylvania Democrat also blasted his rival for majority leader, House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, for siding with President Bush on Iraq. House speaker-to-be Nancy Pelosi has backed Murtha against Hoyer, who is currently the No. 2 Democrat in the House of Representatives. Democrats are slated to vote Thursday on who will take the chamber's leadership posts when the Congress reconvenes in January. Hoyer insists he has commitments from a majority of the caucus. He picked up the public endorsement of a bloc of moderate Democrats on Tuesday. The Maryland congressman also refuted Murtha's accusation that he backed the war, saying he has sided with Democratic calls for a "phased redeployment" of U.S. troops. Watchdog group frowns on Murtha In routing the GOP in the November 7 elections, Democrats attacked what they called a Republican "culture of corruption." Now a Washington watchdog group is questioning the party's sincerity and alleging that Murtha steered Pentagon contracts to businesses that hired his brother as a lobbyist. "How can Americans believe that the Democrats will return integrity to the House when future Speaker Pelosi has endorsed an ethically challenged member for a leadership position?" Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, asked in a written statement. "Rep. Murtha is the wrong choice for this job." Murtha told ABC in October that his brother "was treated like everybody else." Murtha also turned up in the FBI's Abscam investigation in 1980, when undercover agents offered bribes to several members of Congress. Murtha was videotaped turning down a bribe "at this point," and he was not charged. In a statement issued Tuesday, Murtha -- who just won an 18th term -- blasted critics who raised concerns about "unfounded allegations that occurred 26 years ago." "I thought we were above this type of swift-boating attack," he said, referring to the largely refuted but widely publicized attacks on Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry's military record in 2004. "This is not how we restore integrity and civility to the United States Congress." Murtha: War position led to victory Murtha is a retired Marine colonel with close ties to the military and supported the 2003 invasion of Iraq. But he stunned much of Washington when he called for a swift U.S. pullout in November 2005, a move Pelosi credited with making Iraq "the central issue" of Tuesday's midterm vote. And Murtha said Tuesday, "The Pelosi-Murtha position on the war is the reason the Democrats are in the majority today. Congressman Hoyer's position has been to stay the course with President Bush from the very beginning and, like Sen. John McCain, he advocates sending in more troops," he said. Asked about Murtha's remarks, Hoyer -- now the House Democratic whip -- said, "That's not accurate." When Murtha first called for a U.S. withdrawal from Iraq within six months, Hoyer warned that a swift pullout "could lead to disaster." But Hoyer, of Maryland, said he, Murtha and Pelosi are now on the same page and have signed letters to Bush calling for a change in U.S. strategy in Iraq in recent months. "The message we have been sending is that we need to make it clear to the Iraqi government that the situation that currently exists is not sustainable -- that we have to have a change, that we're going to redeploy our troops, we're going to get them out of harm's way," Hoyer told CNN's "The Situation Room" on Monday. A bloc of 33 Democrats from swing districts publicly backed Hoyer on Tuesday, saying he "deserves a lot of the credit" for the party's gains last week. "Steny understands the challenges we face," they wrote. "He never questions our loyalty to the party, and he works hard to ensure that we are treated fairly." When Hoyer unsuccessfully challenged Pelosi for the Democratic leader's job in 2002, Murtha led Pelosi's campaign for the post. But Hoyer said he has worked well with Pelosi over the past four years, and expects to continue that relationship as majority leader.
What is true is that Murtha was offered AND TURNED DOWN a bribe 26 years ago. Come on, if this is the best instance of Dem ehtics violations that the GOP could come up with then they must truly be scraping the bottom of the barrel.
While he wasn't guilty of Abscam, Murtha is one of the biggest pork barrel spenders in congress. He often works in wasteful deals at the taxpayers expense. But when it comes to national security measures, he is dead on. He was a hawk at the start of the Iraq war, and is extremely well connected with the military.
Congresspersons aren't supposed to bring home the bacon if they're Democrats, but apparently it's fine and dandy if they are Republicans. Mmmm... what is it, 2 or 3 times the number of lobbyists in Washington today, than in 2000, when the Hero Decider was elected. Probably more than that, but I'm being charitable. You know, the GOP way. Must be a coincidence. Oh, yes. Gotta be. Surely a coincidence that the number of lobbyists skyrocketed with the GOP in power, while Hero Decider was vetoing ONE FREAKIN' BILL. On stem cell research. Hypocrisy is a b****, isn't it? D&D. A Good Dog Doesn't Need a Leash.
The man dodged entrapment, that puts him one up on most of the other side of the ilse. (insert Admiral Akbar graphic here)