I'm really starting to wonder about this man. Look at this recent article. http://msn.espn.go.com/mlb/news/2002/0803/1413784.html When referring to the Twins success, here's what he had to say: Uh, Bud, Oakland is small market and they are right in the thick of the playoff race, same with Montreal to an extent, and Cincinnatti. When asked if the teams up for possible contraction had changed, here is what good ol' Bud had to say : This as of now is likely financially true. However that said, Bud, teams like Tampa Bay or the Tigers have potential to grow? Oh, I forgot, you only look at the financial picture, we shouldn't care about the talent the teams have. Here's a little secret, Selig, try moving these teams first, then come back and tell me if they have little potential to grow. I see your problem Bud, you are jealous that these two teams with their combined payroll being less or equal to Milwaukee's, are kicking the Brewers butts in the standings. Aren't you? This is who we have running the great game of Baseball. The guy makes my dog look good. Therefore, bringing me to the this highly fundamental question: Who is smarter: Bud Selig or an extremely intelligent canine creature? My vote, It's the dog all the way.
Is Bud Selig smarter than a dog? Hell, no he isn't. He is dumber than that squirrel that is always getting itself electrocuted and lives (was living) in your backyard.
Lassie's IQ is at least 25 points higher. (I think Lassies IQ is 26) http://abc.net.au/animals/dog_test/results.htm