Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Iraq: More Words Betrayed by Actions

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by rimrocker, Apr 5, 2006.

Tags:

Page 1 of 2

rimrocker Member

Joined:

Dec 22, 1999

Messages:

23,156

Likes Received:

10,251

Tell me again why we're there...

Democracy In Iraq Not A Priority in U.S. Budget

By Peter Baker
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, April 5, 2006; A01
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/04/AR2006040401626_pf.html

While President Bush vows to transform Iraq into a beacon of democracy in the Middle East, his administration has been scaling back funding for the main organizations trying to carry out his vision by building democratic institutions such as political parties and civil society groups.

The administration has included limited new money for traditional democracy promotion in budget requests to Congress. Some organizations face funding cutoffs this month, while others struggle to stretch resources through the summer. The shortfall threatens projects that teach Iraqis how to create and sustain political parties, think tanks, human rights groups, independent media outlets, trade unions and other elements of democratic society.

The shift in funding priorities comes as security costs are eating up an enormous share of U.S. funds for Iraq and the administration has already ratcheted back ambitions for reconstructing the country's battered infrastructure. While acknowledging that they are investing less in party-building and other such activities, administration officials argue that bringing more order and helping Iraqis run effective ministries contribute to democracy as well.

Jennifer Windsor, executive director of Freedom House, an advocacy group that hosted a Bush speech last week, called the situation "a travesty" and said she is "appalled" that more is not being done. "This is the time to show that democracy promotion is more than holding an election. If the U.S. can't see fit to fund follow-up democracy promotion at this time," then it is making a mistake, she said.

"The commitment to what the president of the United States will say every single day of the week is his number one priority in Iraq, when it's translated into action, looks very tiny," said Les Campbell, who runs programs in the Middle East for the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, known as NDI.

NDI and its sister, the International Republican Institute (IRI), will see their grants from the U.S. Agency for International Development dry up at the end of this month, according to a government document, leaving them only special funds earmarked by Congress last year. Similarly, the U.S. Institute of Peace has had its funding for Iraq democracy promotion cut by 60 percent. And the National Endowment for Democracy expects to run out of money for Iraqi programs by September.

"Money keeps getting transferred away to security training. Democracy's one of the things that's been transferred," said Thomas Carothers of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace's project on democracy and the rule of law. "Without that, all the other stuff looks like just background work."

Among the projects facing closure is the Iraq Civil Society and Media Program, funded by USAID and run by America's Development Foundation and the International Research & Exchanges Board. The program has established four civil society resource centers around the country, conducted hundreds of workshops and forums, and trained thousands of government officials in transparency and accountability. It also helped Iraqis set up the National Iraqi News Agency, the first independent news agency in the Arab world.

The program was supposed to run at least through June 2007 but without $15 million more, it will have to close this summer.

Officials at the White House, the State Department, the Office of Management and Budget and USAID were contacted for comment in recent days, but none would speak on the record. In response to a request for comment, USAID sent promotional documents hailing past accomplishments in Iraq, such as sponsoring town hall meetings, training election monitors, and distributing pamphlets, posters and publications explaining voting and the new constitution.

The president's supplemental Iraq spending request includes just $10 million for democracy promotion, and his proposed budget for fiscal 2007 asks for $63 million, a fraction of the tens of billions of dollars spent each year on Iraq. But officials argue that other funds in effect further the same goal. For instance, the administration targeted $254 million for enhancing the rule of law by creating a fair judiciary and a humane prison system.

For Bush, developing democracy in Iraq has become perhaps the signature of his presidency, and he takes special pride in the three elections held since sovereignty was transferred by U.S. authorities. Veterans of past democracy-building efforts, however, have complained that having elections is not enough -- an argument the president has embraced lately, both in his speeches and in his newly released National Security Strategy.

"Elections start the process. They're not the end of the process," Bush told Freedom House last week. "And one of the reasons I respect the Freedom House is because you understand that you follow elections with institution-building and the creation of civil society."

Money flowed to such programs in the beginning of the Iraq enterprise. The National Endowment for Democracy, which supported projects in the Kurdish north of Iraq even before the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003, found itself soon after Baghdad fell with $25 million to expand elsewhere in the country and eventually received a total of $71 million. It distributed some to IRI and NDI and some to groups such as the Iraqi National Association for Human Rights in Babylon and the Organization for a Model Iraqi Society.

Last month the endowment received the final $3 million owed on past allocations, with no further funding identified. "It does feel like everybody's getting squeezed in this area," said Barbara Haig, the endowment's vice president. "There probably is a commitment to these programs in principle. I don't know how much commitment there is in specificity."

IRI and NDI, which are affiliated with the two U.S. political parties, will lose USAID financing April 30. The two party institutes led a coalition to educate Iraqis before last year's elections. An evaluation commissioned by USAID in December called it "essential" that the program "be continued for at least another 24 months."

The party institutes will be able to continue some programs for now only because of a special earmark inserted into legislation last year with $56 million for the two groups. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) sponsored the earmark with support from Sens. Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.), Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.), Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) after it appeared that NDI and IRI would run out of money last year.

"The solution to Iraq lies in the political process, and it's reckless for the White House to cut funds to strengthen democracy in Iraq at this time," Kennedy said yesterday.

At current spending rates, the earmark will run out this year. After that, the Bush administration has included just $15 million for the two party institutes as part of the $63 million for Iraqi democracy in next year's budget, which would require most programs to be cut.

The U.S. Institute of Peace faces similar cutbacks to its program. "It's just vital," said Daniel P. Serwer, an institute vice president. All the democracy programs in Iraq combined, he noted, cost less than one day of the U.S. military mission. "Am I absolutely sure that we will shorten the deployment time of American troops enough to justify the cost of the program? Yes," he said.
Click to expand...

#1 rimrocker, Apr 5, 2006

ChrisBosh Member

Joined:

Mar 29, 2006

Messages:

4,326

Likes Received:

301

...because we want to be there.

#2 ChrisBosh, Apr 5, 2006
user Member

Joined:

Nov 30, 2002

Messages:

1,189

Likes Received:

0

rimrocker said:

Tell me again why we're there...
Click to expand...

Because the God told Mr. President when he was choked by a piece of pretzel and passed out.

#3 user, Apr 5, 2006
CreepyFloyd Member

Joined:

Mar 31, 2006

Messages:

1,458

Likes Received:

1

i'm sure the us wouldnt be there if iraq was the world's leading exporter of oranges and bananas

the us is there for a few reasons....to further establish its dominance in the region in close coordination with israel and to control even more access to oil, while establishing a puppet regime in iraq and gaining more military bases in the middle east to support illegitimate rulers and violently opposing countries it doesnt agree with

#4 CreepyFloyd, Apr 5, 2006
CreepyFloyd Member

Joined:

Mar 31, 2006

Messages:

1,458

Likes Received:

1

ChrisBosh said:

...because we want to be there.
Click to expand...

as always your analysis is ground-breaking

#5 CreepyFloyd, Apr 5, 2006
rhadamanthus Member

Joined:

Nov 20, 2002

Messages:

14,304

Likes Received:

596

According to Hayes it's because we love spreading democracy - and anything adverse to that opinion is "self serving". We need to rely on Hayes' "realistic assessments" of these situations to understand why Bush is doing the right thing - if you disagree you've been "glynched" by the liberal media. And for goodness' sake - don't expect Hayes to hold himself to his own standards - that's not hypocrisy, it's neocon ideology.

You could substitute any blinded neocon for Hayes - I'm just picking on him thanks to his amusing posts in the glynch "blocking" thread.

#6 rhadamanthus, Apr 5, 2006
wnes Contributing Member

Joined:

Feb 19, 2003

Messages:

8,196

Likes Received:

19

rhadamanthus said:

According to Hayes it's because we love spreading democracy - and anything adverse to that opinion is "self serving". We need to rely on Hayes' "realistic assessments" of these situations to understand why Bush is doing the right thing - if you disagree you've been "glynched" by the liberal media. And for goodness' sake - don't expect Hayes to hold himself to his own standards - that's not hypocrisy, it's neocon ideology.

You could substitute any blinded neocon for Hayes - I'm just picking on him thanks to his amusing posts in the glynch "blocking" thread.
Click to expand...

There is also a moral reason, in case you forgot.

#7 wnes, Apr 5, 2006

rimrocker Member

Joined:

Dec 22, 1999

Messages:

23,156

Likes Received:

10,251

wnes said:

There is also a moral reason, in case you forgot.
Click to expand...

Remind me.

#8 rimrocker, Apr 5, 2006
vlaurelio Member

Joined:

Jan 26, 2005

Messages:

21,310

Likes Received:

11,755

wnes said:

There is also a moral reason, in case you forgot.
Click to expand...

can agression be moral?

#9 vlaurelio, Apr 5, 2006
rhadamanthus Member

Joined:

Nov 20, 2002

Messages:

14,304

Likes Received:

596

Wnes is being sarcastic. Check out post 86 in the glynch "blocking" thread if you want.

#10 rhadamanthus, Apr 5, 2006
HayesStreet Member

Joined:

Oct 1, 1999

Messages:

8,507

Likes Received:

181

Hope you don't mind me interrupting your love in . Not sure what the bruhaha is about - more money is going to security so stuff stops blowing up. How is that undemocratic, lol - or even bad? I'm pretty sure the everyday Iraqi would rather money went to security now, rather than to 'think tank' building.

Oh yeah, and rhad - its disappointing that you're mischaracterizing my positions. But the last resort of desperate men I guess...

#11 HayesStreet, Apr 5, 2006
rhadamanthus Member

Joined:

Nov 20, 2002

Messages:

14,304

Likes Received:

596

HayesStreet said:

its disappointing that you're mischaracterizing my positions. But the last resort of desperate men I guess...
Click to expand...

lol. Likewise.

Hey Hayes: I'm not trying to piss you off - in all honesty it's refreshing to have someone to have polite debate with. Even though we really don't agree on much. I like to see the other side - keeps me "grounded".

Oh and it's not mischaracterizing anyway.

#12 rhadamanthus, Apr 5, 2006
Last edited: Apr 5, 2006
CreepyFloyd Member

Joined:

Mar 31, 2006

Messages:

1,458

Likes Received:

1

there is no future in supporting a politically bankrupt regime and their policies....the iraq war has been a failure...no way around that

#13 CreepyFloyd, Apr 5, 2006

rimrocker Member

Joined:

Dec 22, 1999

Messages:

23,156

Likes Received:

10,251

HayesStreet said:

Hope you don't mind me interrupting your love in . Not sure what the bruhaha is about - more money is going to security so stuff stops blowing up. How is that undemocratic, lol - or even bad? I'm pretty sure the everyday Iraqi would rather money went to security now, rather than to 'think tank' building.

Oh yeah, and rhad - its disappointing that you're mischaracterizing my positions. But the last resort of desperate men I guess...
Click to expand...

I don't think it's a zero-sum game. If you're serious about fostering democracy in the Middle East, if you make it the focus of your Presidency, you do both. Instead, we are robbing Peter to pay Paul.

#14 rimrocker, Apr 5, 2006
Saint Louis Member

Joined:

Jun 27, 1999

Messages:

4,260

Likes Received:

0

rimrocker said:

Tell me again why we're there...
Click to expand...

It's quite simple, we are building empire.

#15 Saint Louis, Apr 5, 2006
HayesStreet Member

Joined:

Oct 1, 1999

Messages:

8,507

Likes Received:

181

rimrocker said:

I don't think it's a zero-sum game. If you're serious about fostering democracy in the Middle East, if you make it the focus of your Presidency, you do both. Instead, we are robbing Peter to pay Paul.
Click to expand...

I agree. However, if nobody was at home griping about the cost of the intervention in Iraq then this wouldn't be a problem. That its not a zero sum game - you need security and democratic institutions - just shows what hooey this thread is.

#16 HayesStreet, Apr 5, 2006
wnes Contributing Member

Joined:

Feb 19, 2003

Messages:

8,196

Likes Received:

19

HayesStreet said:

I agree. However, if nobody was at home griping about the cost of the intervention in Iraq then this wouldn't be a problem. That its not a zero sum game - you need security and democratic institutions - just shows what hooey this thread is.
Click to expand...

Hayes, you need to realize US foreign policy cannot succeed on pure moralistic and humanitarian principles just as communism cannot prevail without being an coercive egalitarian doctrine. It's the friggin' human nature.

#17 wnes, Apr 5, 2006
Surfguy Member

Joined:

Sep 23, 1999

Messages:

24,602

Likes Received:

12,895

Saint Louis said:

It's quite simple, we are building empire.
Click to expand...

Can you hear it coming? EMPIRE! Can you hear it calling?

Funny...I heard an interview with this guy(Geoff Tate) on Dallas radio today. He doesn't do politics so keep him out of this thread.

#18 Surfguy, Apr 5, 2006

rimrocker Member

Joined:

Dec 22, 1999

Messages:

23,156

Likes Received:

10,251

HayesStreet said:

I agree. However, if nobody was at home griping about the cost of the intervention in Iraq then this wouldn't be a problem. That its not a zero sum game - you need security and democratic institutions - just shows what hooey this thread is.
Click to expand...

But I thought Bush was a leader with a clear focus and an understanding of his historic place in a triumphant march of Democracy... I thought he was a man who trusted his gut to do what's right and could care less about what others thought. Heck, even with the griping, he's gotten every dollar for Iraq that he's asked for. Sorry, this argument doesn't hold water. No link to Al-Q, no WMD's, and now a weakening, half-hearted attempt at seeding Democracy that is destined to fail.

Around the time of the invasion, I posted a question asking what number of American lives would have to be reached before even the most ardent supporter would say "enough." Now, sadly, one has to posit a similar question: "How much incompetence can you tolerate and still support this war?"

#19 rimrocker, Apr 5, 2006
HayesStreet Member

Joined:

Oct 1, 1999

Messages:

8,507

Likes Received:

181

wnes said:

Hayes, you need to realize US foreign policy cannot succeed on pure moralistic and humanitarian principles just as communism cannot prevail without being an coercive egalitarian doctrine. It's the friggin' human nature.
Click to expand...

I must've blacked out for a few months. Where did I say US foreign policy was purely moralistic? I gotta stop doing that. Feel free to search the many many many US foreign policy and/or Iraq threads in which I have posted many many many times, and try and find ONE SINGLE quote from me saying what you claim I do above.

rimrocker said:

But I thought Bush was a leader with a clear focus and an understanding of his historic place in a triumphant march of Democracy... I thought he was a man who trusted his gut to do what's right and could care less about what others thought. Heck, even with the griping, he's gotten every dollar for Iraq that he's asked for. Sorry, this argument doesn't hold water. No link to Al-Q, no WMD's, and now a weakening, half-hearted attempt at seeding Democracy that is destined to fail.
Click to expand...

Sigh. From 'weaking' on is just empty rhetoric. An understanding that this endeavor won't succeed without stability is not a step away from supporting or prioritizing democracy. It is a necessary precondition.

rimrocker said:

Around the time of the invasion, I posted a question asking what number of American lives would have to be reached before even the most ardent supporter would say "enough." Now, sadly, one has to posit a similar question: "How much incompetence can you tolerate and still support this war?"
Click to expand...

Not sure what your point is - I don't think we should ignore the security issue or how it interrelates with the potential successful democratic transition.

#20 HayesStreet, Apr 5, 2006

(You must log in or sign up to post here.)

Page 1 of 2

Share This Page