1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Iran

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by treeman, Mar 26, 2002.

  1. treeman

    treeman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 1999
    Messages:
    7,146
    Likes Received:
    261
    The Revolution Continues
    What’s brewing in Iran.

    Norouz, the Persian New Year, is a Zoroastrian festival, and does not meet with the favor of the ruling Iranian tyrants. Against the background of the many anti-regime street demonstrations during recent months, the country's Supreme Leader, the Ayatollah Khamenei warned the people not to celebrate Norouz. The result? According to Radio France Internationale and several first-hand accounts, this year's celebrations were unprecedented. Hours before the start of the holiday last Wednesday, flower, food, and candy stores in all the major cities were sold out, and the streets were virtually empty as Iranians went to their homes to gather with their families and friends. This despite constant warnings from the regime, including orders to the media to maintain strict silence about the holiday.

    So we have witnessed yet another referendum on the Iranian regime, and the people have again voted against it. As if further confirmation were required, attendance at leading mosques was sparse, even though the Shia month of mourning — the holiest period of the year for the faithful — started at the same time. No wonder several leading ayatollahs have recently supported a national referendum on the continuation of the Islamic Republic. They now fear that the fall of the regime will bring down Islam along with it.

    At the same time, the regime has become increasingly brazen in its support of terrorism. There are almost daily calls for further violence against Israel and America, and even the scandalously unobservant American press has noted that Iran is actively supporting anti-governmental groups in Afghanistan. The mullahs want to turn Afghanistan into a second Lebanon, for they believe that if they can drive America out of Afghanistan, the Iranian people will lose hope for a democratic change within Iran. In their desperate actions, the mullahs have exposed their hand. As George Tenet accurately testified recently, Iran is in cahoots with all manner of terrorist groups, to the point where the CIA now acknowledges that Shia and Sunni radicals are quite capable of cooperating in killing Jews and Americans.

    It shouldn't have taken so long to figure this out, of course. Iran and the PLO have been cooperating intimately since 1972, but the truth is always welcome, and one probably shouldn't quibble over a mere thirty years.

    The Iranian people are looking to Washington for inspiration and guidance, but aside from President Bush's clear and concise condemnation of the regime, repeated condemnations of Iranian activities by Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, a few remarks from Secretary of State Powell, and a brave and thorough expose of the regime's many sins by National Security Council official Zalmay Khalilzad, this administration has failed to address the Iranian question with the gravity it deserves. No Cabinet secretary has delivered a major speech on the question, and National Security Adviser Rice has been uncharacteristically reticent. Yet they must know that no event in the Axis of Evil would be so important as the fall of the Iranian mullahcracy, for it would show the entire world that the first country to fall into the hands of radical Islamic Fundamentalists — and the country that is truly the Mother of All Terrorism — has failed miserably, and has been rejected by its own people.

    So what are our leaders waiting for? And where are the voices of the deep thinkers calling for democratic change in the Iranian tyranny?

    http://www.nationalreview.com/contributors/ledeen032502.shtml
     
  2. R0ckets03

    R0ckets03 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 1999
    Messages:
    16,326
    Likes Received:
    2,042
    Iraq is getting more attention right now then Iran. Zinni was not able to garner any Middle Eastern support for a strike against Iraq, much less Iran.

    We will first have to diffuse the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and then go after Saddam and Ayotallah. Without helping Palestine, the people of Middle East and Muslims accros the world will look at US as being anti-Islam.
     
  3. Surfguy

    Surfguy Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 1999
    Messages:
    24,557
    Likes Received:
    12,830
    Umm....don't they already hate us? With the type of news they get and even when we help....we're still going to get bad press.

    I don't think you can beat foreign press propaganda to win sentiment....regardless of what you may do that is good. People only see what they can and want to see. I'm sure if we leveled Israel...then they would all love us ;).
     
  4. Ubiquitin

    Ubiquitin Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2001
    Messages:
    19,486
    Likes Received:
    14,509
    :D Just another reason why I should learn Farsi! So I can visit the liberated Iran! WOHOO:cool:
     
  5. haven

    haven Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 1999
    Messages:
    7,945
    Likes Received:
    14
    Treeman:

    Stop quoting tabloids. I would feel embarrassed to cite the National Review in a paper, at a flippin' conservative school.
     
  6. treeman

    treeman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 1999
    Messages:
    7,146
    Likes Received:
    261
    haven - the fact that you dislike it pleases me. :)

    BTW, good job arguing the merits of the article's points...
     

Share This Page