http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/st...tatitudes_0225/ Shooting stars Finding out the NBA's most -- and least -- efficient shooters Posted: Tuesday February 25, 2003 1:16 AM Updated: Tuesday February 25, 2003 5:51 PM Najera's layups make him the NBA's most efficient shooter. Glenn James/NBAE/ Getty Images By John Hollinger, SI.com While Tracy McGrady and Kobe Bryant are busy making it a two-horse race for the title of the league's most prolific scorer, another question remains unanswered: Who is the league's most efficient scorer? In other words, who gets the most out of his shot attempts? At first, one might look to field-goal percentage to answer this question. Shaquille O'Neal is running away with the league lead at 55.9 percent. So does that settle it? Not exactly. For one thing, the top 10 in field-goal percentage consist entirely of forwards and centers. There are no guards because they're the ones taking all the 3-point shots, which are lower percentage but worth an extra point. Shooting 38 percent on those, for instance, is better than as Shaq shooting 55.9 percent on lay-ups and dunks. For another, there are free throws. Shaq spends huge chunks of the game at the line, where he hits just 61 percent of his tries. Perhaps a player with a lower field-goal percentage but a more respectable mark from the line is actually more effeicient. To settle this, I created a stat called points per shot attempt, or PSA. To compute it, take free-throw attempts and multiply by 0.44, then add field-goal attempts. Take the player's points and divide by that number, and you're done: PSA = Points / (FGA + (FTA *0.44)) (Why multiply by 0.44? Because one free throw attempt is equivalent to 0.44 field goal attempts. It would be 0.5 exactly if every foul resulted in two shots, but one-shot fouls after made baskets, technical fouls and lane violations bring the number down.) So enough with the numbers already. Who are the best? Here's this year's top 10 in PSA: The top 10 Points per shot attempt, minimum 500 minutes Player Team PPG FG% FT% PSA Eduardo Najera Dal 7.3 61.7 .720 1.323 Andrei Kirilenko Uta 12.2 51.1 .811 1.281 Reggie Miller Ind 13.7 45.0 .883 1.266 Eric Piatkowski LAC 9.5 48.4 .828 1.230 P.J. Brown NO 10.5 53.8 .866 1.230 Doug Christie Sac 10.4 48.4 .814 1.222 Jake Voskuhl Pho 3.5 55.2 .692 1.216 Brad Miller Ind 14.2 51.1 .824 1.212 Tony Battie Bos 7.6 55.7 .763 1.203 Yao Ming Hou 13.5 51.8 .798 1.196 Dallas' Eduardo Najera, a decent shooter who nonetheless mostly accepts dunks and layups from Steve Nash and Nick Van Exel, has been the most efficient scorer in the league. Of course, he only averages seven points a game because he's such an afterthought in the Mavericks' offense. In fact, most of the players on the list above are third options or worse for their teams. While all of them have been fantastic when they get opportunities, none is among the game's elite scorers. As a result, let's modify the top 10 list a bit by restricting it to players who are averaging 15 or more points per game: Top 10 major scorers Points per shot attempt, players averaging 15 points or more Player Team PPG FG% FT% PSA Shaquille O'Neal LAL 25.9 55.9 61.0 1.195 Matt Harpring Uta 18.4 50.6 79.7 1.184 Bobby Jackson Sac 18.0 49.2 85.4 1.180 Peja Stojakovic Sac 18.9 46.9 84.8 1.179 Pau Gasol Mem 18.1 50.6 73.5 1.168 Dirk Nowitzki Dal 23.6 46.8 85.9 1.165 Steve Nash Dal 17.9 45.9 91.3 1.157 Wally Szczerbiak Min 16.5 47.2 85.3 1.145 Shareef Abdur-Rahim Atl 19.9 46.7 82.9 1.140 Corey Maggette LAC 16.4 44.7 77.7 1.137 O'Neal, despite his awful free-throw shooting, is still the most efficient scorer among the league's prominent offensive weapons. In fact, he has a fairly sizable lead over the next closest player, Utah's Matt Harpring, despite a sore toe that's bothered Shaq all season. The only other 20-point scorer to crack the top 10 is Dallas' Dirk Nowitzki, whose 46.8 field-goal percentage isn't that remarkable until you consider all the 3-pointers he's taken. Looking closer at the last two charts, Dallas' three international N's: Najera (Mexico), Nowitzki (Germany), and Nash (Canada), go a long way toward explaining why the Mavs have such a deadly offense. The two featured players, Nash and Nowitzki, are in the top seven in the league in PSA among players averaging 15 or more; meanwhile, Najera easily has the highest PSA in the league. Shawn Bradley just missed being in the top 10 as well. But enough about the good guys. I know what you're thinking already: What about the worst guys? I won't disappoint you. Here's the NBA's bottom ten in PSA among players who have played at least 500 minutes: The bottom 10 Points per shot attempt, minimum 500 minutes Player Team PPG FG% FT% PSA DeSagana Diop Cle 1.4 34.3 39.1 0.712 Jeff Foster Ind 1.9 33.3 52.4 0.747 Junior Harrington Den 5.0 34.9 56.7 0.767 Bimbo Coles Cle 4.9 28.6 79.4 0.769 Nikoloz Tskitishvili Den 3.5 29.2 72.9 0.773 Pat Burke Orl 4.0 35.9 75.0 0.798 Damon Stoudamire Por 5.2 32.7 69.0 0.813 Juaquin Hawkins Hou 2.7 37.3 66.7 0.833 Trenton Hassell Chi 4.6 37.8 69.0 0.849 Jeryl Sasser Orl 2.8 33.1 73.2 0.858 If DeSagana Diop is about to shoot it, there's a good chance somebody on the bench is yelling "Nooooooooo!!!" Cleveland's lottery bust is managing the difficult feat of shooting below 40 percent from both the field and the foul line, leading to a ghastly 0.712 PSA. Diop isn't the only Cav on the list either; teammate Bimbo Coles is fourth from the bottom at .769. The Nuggets are on pace to be the worst offense in NBA history, so it's no surprise that they also placed two players in the bottom five. Rookie point guard Junior Harrington has struggled from the field and the line en route to the third-worst mark. But the guy who might have the most to worry about is rookie forward Nikoloz Tskitishvili. An alleged shooter, his putrid 29.2 percentage has raised eyebrows among Nuggets fans wondering why he was picked ahead of Amare Stoudemire. Yet the bottom list is a bit disappointing as well, because it's made up of players that we already knew couldn't play. What we really want to find out is who, among the NBA's prominent scorers, isn't cashing in enough of their shots? To answer that, I limited the following list to players averaging 10 or more points per game: Please stop shooting Lowest points per shot attempt, players averaging 10 or more points Player Team PPG FG% FT% PSA Michael Olowokandi LAC 12.3 42.7 65.7 0.923 Malik Allen Mia 10.4 43.8 73.7 0.926 Dajuan Wagner Cle 14.0 37.0 80.0 0.952 Antoine Walker Bos 20.9 39.1 61.9 0.959 Morris Peterson Tor 14.8 38.8 78.8 0.968 Caron Butler Mia 14.1 39.4 82.2 0.974 James Posey Hou 10.6 38.0 82.2 0.974 Antonio Davis Tor 14.3 40.9 74.0 0.975 Vince Carter Tor 18.2 42.8 76.2 0.981 Cliff Robinson Det 12.6 40.7 65.2 0.981 As we can see, the Clippers' strategy of feeding the ball to Michael Olowokandi is highly questionable when one considers his low-impact shooting (not to mention all the turnovers, but that's a story for another day). Two more surprising names on the list are Antoine Walker and Vince Carter. Walker has been just as erratic as ever from the field this year (a career-low 39 percent), and has also hurt himself with a free-throw mark that has plummetted to 61.9. Carter, meanwhile, has compounded his low-percentage shooting by making himself a rare visitor to the free-throw line. He takes nearly six field-goal attempts for every free throw, clobbering his PSA in the process. Overall, PSA is superior tool to field-goal percentage because it also takes in 3-point shooting and free-throw success. While accurate shooters shouldn't necessarily be featured scorers -- I don't imagine the Mavs are drawing up plays for Najera right now -- it does reflect which players make the most of their scoring chances. John Hollinger covers the NBA for SI.com and is the author of Pro Basketball Prospectus.
Thanks, rockbox. It's very interesting. Piatkowski is someone I'd like to see the Rockets pick up this summer if he's cheap. We desperately need some efficient shooters who can REGULARLY hit the 3. Someone dependable that has skills. He fits the bill. Man, it doesn't make Posey look too good. Whoa.