1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

If Rockets get out of the Taylor Contract; they can be a player in the '06 FA class

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Zacatecas, Feb 7, 2005.

  1. Zacatecas

    Zacatecas Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    1,524
    Likes Received:
    111
    Yao becomes a FA in 2006. And a bunch of contracts come off the books this year as well.

    That would leave Sura, McGrady, Howard, Ward, and Taylor with contracts.

    If Yao and the Rockets were on the same page, and it was agreed by Yao to allow the Rockets to chase a FA before he signed his contract with the Rockets they could go after a big time player to help this team.

    If the Rockets were able to trade Taylor for expiring contracts before then, that would mean an additional 8 million dollars off the cap books. McGrady making about 16 million, Howard making about 6 million, Surra making about 4 million, Gaines making about 2 million, and Ward making about 2 million; so that puts the Rockets at roughly 30 million dollars. (Keep in mind that all of these contracts might be more, because I just took an average. But I don't think it be much more than 5 or 6 million over the 30 million dollar figure. That would still put the Rockets at the 36 million dollar figure.)

    But, if Taylor is still on the Roster, that puts the Rockets at 38 to 44 million dollars. The Rockets could still be players in the FA market, but they would have to settle for the second or third tier FA's.

    But, if what I see is correct, in the summer of 2006, the Rockets could be big time players for a free agent. And not just a FA, quite possibly a super star player.

    Now let's get rid of Taylor's albatross contract.


    (The only thing I used as a reference for the salaries was http://www.dfw.net/~patricia/contracts)
     
  2. Man

    Man Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2003
    Messages:
    2,945
    Likes Received:
    13
    :) That sounds good..I guess we'll have to be very patient lol.

    I would definitely go for a power forward if we still do not have one by then..and then get an athletic, young shooting guard or small forward who can play defense and knock down perimter shots with Tmac.
     
  3. smoothie

    smoothie Jabari Jungle

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    6,947
    what you were not taking into account are contracts yet to be signed or extended. i think the rockets will give barry and deke 2 year deals this summer (if deke doesn't retire). and i think padgett is due for an extention sometime next year. it is popular belief that we will sign a PG this summer using part or most of the MLE. and cd is dead set on keeping this draft pick.

    with that all added, i do not think we will be under that cap anytime soon. it is possible to be under the cap however, we are not in a rebuilding mode. all we need to do is add a couple of players and we have a championship.
     
  4. NIKEstrad

    NIKEstrad Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2000
    Messages:
    10,232
    Likes Received:
    4,238
    Sigh. Another waste of a thread. :(

    Assuming the CBA stays similar, and in this regard it almost certainly will, unsigned free agents count against your cap unless you renounce them. If renounced, you lose all Bird Rights to said free agent.

    The cap hit an unrenounced free agent is greater than 100% of the player's previous salary, depending on years of service, etc. but not to exceed the player's max possible salary.

    For Yao, this cap hit will in all likelihood be the max, or if not, very close to it. He will count as a max player against our cap until he signs. Further, the Rockets are more likely to give him an extension before he reaches free agency.

    Basically, your entire premise is flawed.
     
  5. choujie

    choujie Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2002
    Messages:
    7,389
    Likes Received:
    77
    They have tried to unload Taylor for 3 years, but no luck.
     
  6. pariah

    pariah Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2003
    Messages:
    1,089
    Likes Received:
    148
    Delete - invoke of the NIKESTRAD rule.
     
  7. Deuce

    Deuce Context & Nuance

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2001
    Messages:
    26,601
    Likes Received:
    35,733
    Everyone just except the fact that we arent going to be big FA players with a Max Tmac and a soon to be Max Yao on this team. We have the foundation. Now we build via the MLE, some trades to fill some holes, and via the draft.
     
  8. topfive

    topfive CF OG

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    19,955
    Likes Received:
    39,659
    THREAD REJECTED
     
  9. saleem

    saleem Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2001
    Messages:
    30,316
    Likes Received:
    14,752
    The draft will be important. We need to get a good player with some experience at either the college or international level who can fit in fairly quickly. Unfortunately our trading assets are limited. The MLE might yield us a good player if we are lucky but it's going to be difficult to acquire talent because of our salary cap position.
     
  10. JoeBarelyCares

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2001
    Messages:
    6,609
    Likes Received:
    1,883
    It would be nice to figure out how to shed MoT's contract a year early, so that we can be enough under the luxury tax threshold to be a player on the MLE market.
     
  11. Man

    Man Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2003
    Messages:
    2,945
    Likes Received:
    13
    yeah that's what I'm hoping for. Mo's regressed..doesn't fit here.

    We have foundation set. We need to replace the old guys with younger guys who will play similar roles as old guys are now. Old guys can stay as bench players..but yeah we need a shooting guard and a power forward.
     
  12. rodrick_98

    rodrick_98 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2000
    Messages:
    4,362
    Likes Received:
    6
    arent there players still counting against our cap not listed on that site, such as matt maloney?
     
  13. gucci888

    gucci888 Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    17,227
    Likes Received:
    6,573
    Let's look at this summer:

    Hopefully we resign Barry and Deke to a 1-year vet. minimum contract.

    We let Barrett, Bowen, and Strickland walk. They have small contracts so it really won't help that much.

    Sign Antonio Daniels for the MLE and trade MoT for a TE, which I believe could actually be done. Then we deal the TE for a PF, via sign and trade, Swift or Chandler would be nice.

    Then we would have Spoon's deal coming off the books the next summer just in time for Yao's deal.

    Next years lineup (hopefully):

    AD-Barry
    Wesley-Sura
    TMac-draft pick
    Swift-Howard
    Yao-Deke
     
  14. Zacatecas

    Zacatecas Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    1,524
    Likes Received:
    111

    Then How did the Spurs do it with Tim Duncan. I remember last year when they went after Kidd, Duncan agreed to sign his contract after they went after the free agents.
     
  15. NIKEstrad

    NIKEstrad Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2000
    Messages:
    10,232
    Likes Received:
    4,238
    Because they were under the cap including Duncan.

    Now I had to go look at the numbers- under the current CBA, it's 250% for a player in Yao's situation. He'll count as the max.

    Unrenounced Free Agency

    I shouldn't even really provide that much.
     
  16. gr8-1

    gr8-1 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Messages:
    7,918
    Likes Received:
    4
    Who is AD?
     
  17. gucci888

    gucci888 Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    17,227
    Likes Received:
    6,573
    Antonio Daniels
     
  18. franchise?..NOT

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2002
    Messages:
    450
    Likes Received:
    0
    I hate to be like this but why is this thread still open? Anyone who does not get that MoT is not ever going to be traded for ending contracts after all this time is living in a dream world.

    MoT IS NOT GOING TO BETRADED B4 HIS LAST YEAR WHEN HE BECOMES AN ENDING CONTRACT !!!!!!!!

    He is a poster child for wink,wink agreements. He has his millions and is not interested in earning them and has shown this for 3 years. That is why he is not tradeable. If he just once spent an off season in the weight room, (rumor was he did so last summer. I don't see it) he could be a real NBA 4. He has not, is not and will not be. We are stuck with him until season of 2006/7. We are stuck with 'spoon until 2005/6 when they are in the last contract year and are worth something to cap relief seeking, re-building teams. Otherwise they will bring us cap relief a year later. Fortunately our new, old guys probably have enough left in the tank to keep us cometitive for a year or two when we have some money to spend.

    If all of my threads get pulled because I do not contribute then why in the heck is this re-hashed, dea horse issue allowed to remain. At least mine are fresh and invite new discussion.
     
  19. Zacatecas

    Zacatecas Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    1,524
    Likes Received:
    111
    Well Thanks for the info Nikestrad!!
     
  20. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    45,954
    Likes Received:
    28,050
    I don't know about threads being wasted. Time is a different matter. ;)
     

Share This Page