1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Hybrids Consume More Energy in Lifetime Than Chevrolet's Tahoe SUV

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by ArtV, Apr 7, 2006.

  1. ArtV

    ArtV Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    7,003
    Likes Received:
    1,713
    Hybrids Consume More Energy in Lifetime Than Chevrolet's Tahoe SUV

    http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060331/sff031.html?.v=38

    BANDON, Ore., March 31 /PRNewswire/ -- As Americans become increasingly interested in fuel economy and global warming, they are beginning to make choices about the vehicles they drive based on fuel economy and to a lesser degree emissions.

    But many of those choices aren't actually the best in terms of vehicle lifetime energy usage and the cost to society over the full lifetime of a car or truck.

    CNW Marketing Research Inc. spent two years collecting data on the energy necessary to plan, build, sell, drive and dispose of a vehicle from initial concept to scrappage. This includes such minutia as plant to dealer fuel costs, employee driving distances, electricity usage per pound of material used in each vehicle and literally hundreds of other variables.

    To put the data into understandable terms for consumers, it was translated into a "dollars per lifetime mile" figure. That is, the Energy Cost per mile driven.

    The most Energy Expensive vehicle sold in the U.S. in calendar year 2005: Maybach at $11.58 per mile. The least expensive: Scion xB at $0.48 cents.

    While neither of those figures is surprising, it is interesting that driving a hybrid vehicle costs more in terms of overall energy consumed than comparable non-hybrid vehicles.

    For example, the Honda Accord Hybrid has an Energy Cost per Mile of $3.29 while the conventional Honda Accord is $2.18. Put simply, over the "Dust to Dust" lifetime of the Accord Hybrid, it will require about 50 percent more energy than the non-hybrid version.

    One of the reasons hybrids cost more than non-hybrids is the manufacture, replacement and disposal of such items as batteries, electric motors (in addition to the conventional engine), lighter weight materials and complexity of the power package.

    And while many consumers and environmentalists have targeted sport utility vehicles because of their lower fuel economy and/or perceived inefficiency as a means of transportation, the energy cost per mile shows at least some of that disdain is misplaced.

    For example, while the industry average of all vehicles sold in the U.S. in 2005 was $2.28 cents per mile, the Hummer H3 (among most SUVs) was only $1.949 cents per mile. That figure is also lower than all currently offered hybrids and Honda Civic at $2.42 per mile.

    "If a consumer is concerned about fuel economy because of family budgets or depleting oil supplies, it is perfectly logical to consider buying high- fuel-economy vehicles," says Art Spinella, president of CNW Marketing Research, Inc. "But if the concern is the broader issues such as environmental impact of energy usage, some high-mileage vehicles actually cost society more than conventional or even larger models over their lifetime.

    "We believe this kind of data is important in a consumer's selection of transportation," says Spinella. "Basing purchase decisions solely on fuel economy or vehicle size does not get to the heart of the energy usage issue."

    The goal of overall worldwide energy conservation and the cost to society in general -- not just the auto buyer -- can often be better addressed by being aware of a car or truck's "dust to dust" energy requirements, he said.

    This study is not the end of the energy-usage discussion. "We hope to see a dialog begin that puts educated and aware consumers into energy policy decisions," Spinella said. "We undertook this research to see if perceptions (about energy efficiency) were true in the real world."

    Full List
    Source: CNW Marketing Research, Inc.

    Dust to Dust
    Model Energy Cost Per Mile
    =====================
    Maybach $11.582
    Phaeton $11.213
    Rolls-Royce $10.660
    Bentley $10.555
    allroad quattro $5.595
    A8 $4.964
    A6 $4.963
    LS 430 $4.734
    Carrera GT $4.528
    NSX $4.453
    GS 430 $4.416
    Q45 $4.243
    Cayenne $4.146
    Touareg $4.134
    Lamborghini $4.009
    S-Type $3.989
    SLK class $3.982
    Ferrari $3.962
    M45 $3.876
    GS 300 $3.861
    GT $3.851
    Range Rover $3.775
    G class $3.711
    Sequoia $3.672
    S class $3.669
    CLS class $3.668
    H1 $3.505
    CLK class $3.492
    DTS $3.471
    Armada $3.450
    SC 430 $3.407
    DeVille $3.385
    XC90 $3.325
    E class $3.313
    RX330 $3.306
    Seville $3.305
    Excursion $3.304
    80 series $3.301
    Accord Hybrid $3.295
    XLR $3.276
    Prius $3.249
    Civic Hybrid $3.238
    LX 470 $3.229
    Boxster $3.224
    Escalade ESV $3.197
    Land Cruiser $3.184
    Escape Hybrid $3.178
    STS $3.175
    Corvette $3.158
    5 Series $3.140
    Suburban $3.134
    Yukon XL $3.132
    Expedition $3.058
    XK $3.058
    Maserati $3.055
    FX35/45 $3.029
    Aston Martin $3.028
    H2 $3.027
    R class $2.960
    Insight $2.939
    Tahoe $2.937
    50 series $2.937
    Yukon $2.936
    7 Series $2.936
    MDX $2.845
    911 Carrera 4 $2.830
    XJ $2.785
    SRX $2.782
    Pacifica $2.780
    TT $2.768
    RL $2.762
    Town Car $2.756
    Escalade $2.753
    911 Carrera $2.738
    Z8 $2.733
    M3 $2.727
    Golf/GTI $2.697
    Savana/G Van $2.692
    Titan $2.691
    Econoline/Club Wagon $2.686
    GX 470 $2.686
    SL Coupe/Roadster $2.686
    Navigator $2.617
    L series $2.534
    CL class $2.533
    Discovery $2.525
    Murano $2.510
    Tundra $2.509
    Highlander $2.490
    LR3 $2.489
    Ram pickup $2.484
    Z4 $2.483
    QX4 $2.483
    Express/G Van $2.482
    70 series $2.482
    RX8 $2.482
    M class $2.482
    Freestyle/Windstar $2.481
    Silverado $2.450
    Sierra $2.450
    SSR $2.442
    Range Rover Sport $2.420
    Sprinter Van $2.420
    Civic $2.420
    HHR $2.397
    Rendezvous $2.392
    F Series $2.392
    X5 $2.368
    Aviator $2.347
    G6 $2.342
    Mountaineer $2.336
    EuroVan/T4 $2.294
    Industry Straight Average $2.281
    Classic $2.269
    60 series $2.269
    QX56 $2.269
    Ram Van $2.267
    6 Series $2.267
    Lotus $2.267
    Odyssey $2.267
    Outlander $2.266
    X3 $2.264
    Montego $2.264
    LaCrosse $2.245
    B9 Tribeca $2.240
    Montana SV6 $2.239
    Impreza $2.225
    Grand Am $2.224
    Pathfinder $2.220
    Town & Country $2.218
    Tucson $2.215
    Tribute $2.212
    Terraza $2.212
    Fusion $2.202
    Milan $2.202
    Pilot $2.197
    Zephyr $2.196
    Envoy $2.196
    Econoline van $2.195
    4Runner $2.193
    350Z $2.193
    Caravan/Grand Caravan $2.181
    Sienna $2.180
    Accord $2.180
    Rainier $2.180
    Montero $2.177
    Viper $2.176
    9-7X $2.169
    Stratus $2.165
    Venture $2.144
    Relay $2.143
    Montana $2.142
    Montero Sport $2.123
    TL $2.122
    Quest $2.118
    Uplander $2.117
    A3 $2.096
    Eclipse Spyder $2.079
    Freestar $2.069
    Monterey $2.069
    Passat $2.052
    Escalade EXT $2.048
    Jetta wagon $2.046
    CL $2.022
    Xterra $2.022
    Eclipse $2.021
    Santa Fe $2.019
    Magnum $2.019
    Five Hundred $2.018
    LS $2.017
    Jetta $2.016
    GTO $1.995
    Optima $1.994
    Sedona $1.994
    Sonata $1.980
    Avalanche $1.978
    Torrent $1.974
    Endeavor $1.974
    Charger $1.974
    Celica $1.969
    Avalon $1.967
    Maxima $1.966
    300/300M $1.961
    Camry $1.954
    MPV $1.953
    Escape $1.950
    H3 $1.949
    Mariner $1.948
    RAV4 $1.948
    Mark LT $1.944
    Diamante $1.932
    Malibu $1.919
    Baja $1.909
    Trooper $1.909
    X-Type $1.908
    Verona $1.908
    Mini Cooper S $1.908
    RSX $1.908
    40 series $1.897
    Solstice $1.880
    ES 330 $1.852
    I30/I35 $1.851
    Legacy $1.849
    Vue $1.847
    IS 300 $1.833
    Beetle $1.828
    Forester $1.825
    Equinox $1.821
    Ridgeline $1.807
    Element $1.807
    Millenia $1.802
    Lucerne $1.802
    Mazda6 $1.796
    Mini Cooper $1.795
    Bonneville $1.782
    G35 $1.777
    A4/S4 $1.774
    Intrepid $1.772
    Mustang $1.758
    Axiom $1.735
    TSX $1.725
    Safari $1.725
    Astro $1.725
    C class $1.699
    MR2 Spyder $1.683
    CTS $1.680
    Mazda5 $1.679
    Freelander $1.674
    9-3 $1.636
    330 $1.616
    PT Cruiser $1.612
    Park Avenue $1.556
    9-2 $1.553
    Aztek $1.542
    Rodeo $1.542
    Concorde $1.531
    Ascender $1.531
    Commander $1.531
    325 $1.531
    9-5 $1.529
    Monte Carlo $1.506
    Grand Cherokee $1.495
    CR-V $1.478
    XL-7 $1.477
    Thunderbird $1.477
    MX-5 Miata $1.471
    Galant $1.465
    Grand Prix $1.465
    Century $1.455
    S2000 $1.455
    Sable $1.447
    Taurus $1.446
    Tiburon $1.439
    Durango $1.429
    Grand Marquis $1.418
    Crown Victoria $1.417
    Grand Vitara $1.414
    Explorer $1.404
    626 $1.397
    Altima $1.381
    LeSabre $1.372
    TrailBlazer $1.363
    Impala $1.357
    Crossfire $1.323
    Sorento $1.320
    Blazer $1.295
    Firebird $1.287
    Camaro $1.286
    XG350 $1.285
    Sebring $1.283
    Canyon $1.283
    Sonoma $1.283
    Amanti $1.263
    Vitara $1.257
    Rodeo Sport $1.225
    Sportage $1.168
    Regal $1.167
    Frontier $1.160
    Tacoma $1.147
    Colorado $1.125
    Raider $1.124
    Liberty $1.099
    B-Series $1.088
    Dakota $1.014
    Cobalt $1.013
    Matrix ** $1.011
    Vibe $1.011
    Mazda3 $0.980
    Ranger $0.968
    Rio $0.964
    Sentra $0.962
    Aerio $0.888
    Lancer $0.872
    Spectra $0.864
    Accent $0.852
    tC $0.845
    Forenza $0.840
    Focus $0.803
    S10 $0.779
    Protégé $0.772
    Aveo $0.765
    Sunfire $0.758
    Cavalier $0.757
    xA $0.736
    Corolla $0.732
    Neon $0.728
    Elantra $0.723
    Ion $0.709
    Echo $0.703
    Tracker $0.694
    Wrangler $0.604
    Escort $0.568
    xB $0.478
     
  2. Faos

    Faos Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2003
    Messages:
    15,370
    Likes Received:
    53
    They also cost a lot more than similar sized vehicles and ends up being cheaper to buy the cheaper car and more expensive gas than the high priced hybrid.
     
  3. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,432
    Likes Received:
    13,390
    Maybe I'm mis-understanding the article, but what exactly is the point?

    People, at least today, buy hybrids, because they are cleaner. While they may require more energy over the lifetime of the car, they, theoretically, use less gas to "fuel" those energy needs and most are EXTREMELY low emission vehicles.

    Obviously, they cost more and require more resouces, currently, to produce. Arguably, that will change as more and more are bought.
     
  4. Oski2005

    Oski2005 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2001
    Messages:
    18,100
    Likes Received:
    447
    The energy cost is in how much power is consumed to make them, ie electricity to run the factory, fuel to find or make the materials needed. So that fuel and the burning of coal to make the electricity also adds to pollution and consumption.
     
  5. famicom

    famicom Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2003
    Messages:
    1,185
    Likes Received:
    50
    Exactly that's what I was thinking. This technology is still relatively new so of course it's going to cost more to mass produce. And why do we care how much it costs for the company to produce? oh because we're paying for it but as long as the market gets bigger the price should drop hopefully. Cleaner air, less fuel, environmentally safe aren't going to be cheap for now. It seems to me like the article is saying it is cheaper and takes less energy to burn trash than to build recycling plants and bins so people can recycle, then build the trucks so they can transport the bins.
     
  6. mbiker

    mbiker Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2003
    Messages:
    558
    Likes Received:
    1
    This article is brought to you by the American Auto Manufactures (AAM). We at the AAM have realized that we can’t compete in the hybrid market. We are manufacturing archaic technology and being blown away by foreign competition. Although we realize that the future of the auto industry is in hybrid technology, it is much easier for us to sponsor studies that offer a negative look at this technology.

    The American public needs to realize that developing new technology is hard work and is unnecessary. Manufacturing the same old cars and programming the consumers with slick commercial advertisements is so much easier. Here is a sample of our newest slogan “Don’t buy a wimpy hybrid, you need to be tough, Chevy tough.“

    We sponsored the Hybrid study because some of our companies are on verge of bankruptcy. We feel that that because of Tivo and DVRs, the American public is not getting our message. Consumers are skipping over our commercials. We are losing market share in many states. In fact, Texas is one of our greatest concerns. Even though we try to remind them 5 – 6 times during a show that “Ford is the best in Texas” they are still buying foreign cars.

    We are surprised by our lack of sales in Texas, as we have always supported that state. In fact, a couple of years ago we tried to move one of our manufacturing plants to Texas, but our GPS was not working properly and we were off by 400 miles southwest.

    The AAM will continue to look into the hybrid technology fallacy. Our next sponsored study will look into gas emission. The title of the article is ”Nitrogen Oxides and Hydrocarbons May Increase You Sex Drive”
     
  7. nyquil82

    nyquil82 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2002
    Messages:
    5,174
    Likes Received:
    3
  8. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,432
    Likes Received:
    13,390
  9. ArtV

    ArtV Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    7,003
    Likes Received:
    1,713
    What they are trying to say is not how much it costs to produce, it's how much energy is used (spent) to make something - as Oski2005 pointed out. If I need to burn a bunch of coal or create a bunch of nuclear waste to generate enough electricity that is needed to create the car, I'm not sure that is a better way - or at least it's not as clear cut as some would have you to believe.

    Unless they find a better way (not less expensive) to manufacture these cars and dispose of these cars, they will always cost the environment more than they save. And I hope they have a good plan in place for battery disposal/recycle.

    By the way - I'm not a GM man. I'm one of those Honda/Toyota people. And I'm not for everyone driving SUVs. I just think this is more information if someone wants to see the big picture.
     
  10. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,432
    Likes Received:
    13,390
    But it isn't that clear, though. One can easily argue that it may use more now, but it will save significantly more down the road - the recycling bin analogy. What's more, if these types of technologies push other alternative energy sources - solar for example - then that energy would be "funded" (to use their $ comparison) by a much much cleaner source.

    The article to me completely ignores that aspect of it. Should we care if the car itself even uses twice as much energy as a normal car, if it is "funding" 75% of the total with kinetic energy into re-chargeable batteries??

    I'm not saying those numbers are right, just pointing out that the article is pointless/useless.
     
  11. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,056
    Likes Received:
    15,230
    ...But, I still pay less for gas than I would for a non-hybrid right?
     
  12. bigtexxx

    bigtexxx Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    26,980
    Likes Received:
    2,363
    so basically this article states that hybrids are for greedy people who want to save money at the expense of the environment? interesting.
     
  13. Rashmon

    Rashmon Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2000
    Messages:
    21,233
    Likes Received:
    18,248
    Do some research on the source (or major funders) of the study and you will find that this response may not be too far off.
     
  14. droxford

    droxford Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2001
    Messages:
    10,598
    Likes Received:
    2,131
    To be brutally honest, I would only consider buying a hybrid to lower my costs. If I were to buy a hybrid it would need to meet these qualifications:
    1. be a good-looking car that had good pickup, was comfortable, and reliable
    2. it would be clear that the hybrid would be well worth the extra purchase cost in order to reduce my fuel costs (i.e. it would drink less gas, and I wouldn't have to plug it into the wall, sending my electricity bill through the roof)
    3. be a car that could be repaired at reasonable rates my almost any mechanic (or by myself).
    Hybrids seem to fail on all three of those. I think that if they could succeed in those three, hybrid sales would skyrocket.
     
  15. reggietodd

    reggietodd Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,103
    Likes Received:
    0
  16. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,432
    Likes Received:
    13,390
    This is true now. Many new hybrids are the same body style as their non-hybrid counterparts. Lexus' hybrids go the route of more power for less consumption. That is, their hybrids essentially give you a bigger engine for a smaller engine consumption. The new GS hybrid coming out, for example, is faster than any of the GS non-hybrid versions, but gives you better gas mileage than any of the others. It's like driving a V8 with V6 gas mileage. And it's priced only $6,000 above the non-hybrid version.

    As with many things in life, if you are an early adopter, you pay more. You don't have to plug hybrids in, but you will be getting better gas mileage for sure. It is just unlikely, at this stage, that you will save money...you'd have to really drive that car a lot of miles to save money.

    Just do the math. Say 1 non-hybrid gets 20 mpg whereas a hybrid gets 30 mpg. Assuming $2.75 gas, over 50,000 miles you save $2,300. Over 100,000 you save $4600. Depending on company, the price difference between hybrid/non-hybrid is that or a little more. Though this is coming down some. Check out the new Toyota Camry, with the base price on the hybrid version being only $1,500 more than base on the non-hybrid version.

    And you do still have the tax credit to consider. Assume a $3,000 tax credit at 30% taxes = $900 more savings.

    So, in all, the price difference is really starting to swing in the hybrid favor, assuming you drive a car at least 50,000. And considering that gas prices aren't likely to come down much, if any, going forward, and that with hybrid engines you can use the cheapest gas available, the difference may be even more in your favor.

    Obviously, to be completely accurate, you have to start looking at time value of money (paying more now to save a little later), resale value and extra costs associated with up-keep (if any).

    Almost all new cars come with warranties that cover these things up to 50,000 - 100,000 miles these days anyway. I haven't read anything that would lead me to believe in the 10 years or so of hybrids that they have been any more likely to break down or have major mechanical problems than a non-hybrid (though I could be wrong).

    You're undoubtedly correct that it would be harder to find a 3rd party mechanic, though, and those you would find would be at higher rates. But again, this is what the warranty is for.

    I think clearly they don't fail all three. They may not pass all three though. For someone like you, another 2-4 years will get you over the hump. As American companies come out with hybrids to catch up, SUVs start incorporating hybrids and the Japanese (Toyota, Nissan) continue to lead the way in the technology (Lexus has been enormously successful so far, to the point where they've even considering coming out with a hybrid line), prices will drop, savings will increase, the extra power will become apparent and mechanical issues will be less questionable.

    Fortunately, there are people out there not just thinking me, me, me, and trying, at least, to help out the environment and reduce our dependency on oil, that the technology is continuing to grow.
     
    #16 JayZ750, Apr 7, 2006
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2006
  17. droxford

    droxford Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2001
    Messages:
    10,598
    Likes Received:
    2,131
    I agree. Hybrids are going in the right direction and some of them are meeting some of the qualifications I listed. I think you're right - in a few years they'll be doing a lot better about meeting those qualifications (and the market for hybrid mechanics will have increased).

    Improvements have been made, but we're not quite there yet.
     
  18. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,853
    Likes Received:
    41,355
    Well before this poor thread gets run off to D&D - this thing seems pretty flawed.

    "CNW Marketing Research Inc. spent two years collecting data on the energy necessary to plan, build, sell, drive and dispose of a vehicle from initial concept to scrappage."

    LOL, what, they include planning cost? So since hybrid/alternate fuel vehicles are still developing and need more design, they have a higher "energy" cost. What does that mean? That the design team consumes more calories?

    how far back do they go on "initial concept"? Does it go back to Henry Ford for gas-powered cars? Or the invention of the internal combustion engine.

    And scrappage - what?

    This doesn't make much sense. It seems like they're folding in development costs for hybrids, which can only be amortized over a few years in the products life cycle since the technology is young - and then not doing the same for gas vehicles since the tech is 100+ years old. That's cheating

    ...and it doesn't begin to reach the relevant issue with driving hybrids anyway - emissions reduction.

    ...but you could also hook your hybrid up to a windmill to recharge its battery and your hybrid car factory up to solar panels and have a VERY high $$$ energy cost since wind and solar power are expensive, especially in initial stages.

    A car like that would be at the top of this survey if that's what it measures -- and it would be the "Green"est vehicle ever made.
     
    #18 SamFisher, Apr 7, 2006
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2006
  19. Mr. Brightside

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    18,964
    Likes Received:
    2,147
  20. ArtV

    ArtV Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    7,003
    Likes Received:
    1,713
    I agree that I don't see how planning costs factor in since this is about energy costs. Unless they mean the energy to create prototypes but I would think that those costs would be relatively low. And I would hope that all factors were taken into account such as how much energy it takes to covert a barrel of oil into gas and how much gas is saved on a hybrid.

    The article as I read it was saying that basically some of these "green" cars require more energy to make, run and destroy than some SUVs. Creating energy (not including solar or wind since they are a very small part) creates pollution. So if it takes more (lets say electrical) energy to create the parts for a hybrid, you are creating more air pollution or nuclear waste since most electricity is created by coal burning or nuclear plants. Robbing Peter to pay Paul kind of thing.

    I didn't mean this to be a D&D article. I just thought it was interesting - assuming it wasn't funded by the Auto Industry.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now