1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

How stupid are the Bucks?

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by AroundTheWorld, Jul 7, 2003.

  1. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,281
    Now that Payton has announced he will not be back with Milwaukee...I understand even less what the hell they were thinking when they made the deal with the Sonics...basically, they gave Ray Allen away for far less than his value. Actually, the Cassell deal also looks to me like they got the short end of the stick...not sure what they are thinking. First they let their GM dismantle the team together with George Karl, then they let him go. Makes no sense at all (well, maybe to let him go, after he made those trades, but...).

    Or do you actually think the Bucks did well in these trades?
     
  2. hoopgod13

    hoopgod13 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2002
    Messages:
    810
    Likes Received:
    6
    I thought the Gary Payton and Desmond Mason trade was great. They got one of the game's great young players in D-mase...and a HOFer in payton. unfortunate they couldn't resign him, but mason is no consolation prize. Ray Allen and the Bucks had no future, so it was time to rebuild.

    The Cassell trade was weak however. They have TJ waiting in the wings, which is great...and they did need size. However, they ended up getting Joe Smith for gods sake. that guy is the softest PF this side of eddie griffin and mo taylor.

    TJ, Desmond Mason, Michael Redd make for a solid PG, SF, and SG tandem for the future. Now if they can improve upon tim thomas and joe smith up front, they could be leastern conference contenders.
     
  3. LAfadeaway33

    LAfadeaway33 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2001
    Messages:
    1,825
    Likes Received:
    1
    They got rid of all their big contracts and have a great base from which to rebuild at the guard positions with TJ, Mason, Redd, and Thomas.
     
  4. SLA

    SLA Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    3,021
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well they will suck for a while. Who knows....

    Maybe TJ Ford will lead them to victory! They still have Desmond Mason, Tim Thomas, Michael Redd, Marcus Haislip, and Toni Kukoc.

    BASICALLY, they are screwed!

    GP announced that? Hmm...
     
  5. CriscoKidd

    CriscoKidd Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 1999
    Messages:
    9,303
    Likes Received:
    546
    They still have Anthony Mason's and Thomas's big contracts, which are the hardest on the to move imo.

    The bucks suck ass, and they're going to be losing badly for a long time.
     
  6. Newgirl

    Newgirl Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2003
    Messages:
    752
    Likes Received:
    1
    The current Bucks owner wants to sell the franchise.
    He got rid of those big contracts to avoid possible luxury tax to make the franchise more salesble.
     
  7. leebigez

    leebigez Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2001
    Messages:
    15,812
    Likes Received:
    786
    It would have made more sense to draft a big guy or low post presence and keep cassell since he's so cheap anyway. They had no plan to speak of and now they will be in the lotto for a long time. They overpaid for Thomas, traded Robinson,Allen and Casselland have really nothing to show. They're screwed and now they'll just have basically the same kind of team they had before. A small jump shooting no inside game type of squad. They're really screwed.
     
  8. leebigez

    leebigez Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2001
    Messages:
    15,812
    Likes Received:
    786
    Cassell makes a little more than 5 m and comes off the books in 2 yrs. Joe Smith will be on the books for that same 5 mil for another 5 yrs, it really makes no sense.
     
  9. NIKEstrad

    NIKEstrad Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2000
    Messages:
    10,210
    Likes Received:
    4,162
    Not really. He could've sold it to MJ, and decided not to sell.

    I said the Bucks jumped the gun with the Cassell move without having Payton in hand, and that definitely seems to be the case.

    As others said, Ford, Redd, Mason, and then perhaps Thomas and Haislip is a decent start. P-Billa....haha.

    Milwaukee better hope that it's Portland GP chooses, and that they can pull a S/T- see if they can finangle Q Woods or Zach Randolph out of it.

    They're gonna be a lotto team this year, and there's not much way around it. They should stockpile young talent, see if they can move Mase, and then hope to land in position to nab Emeka Okafor next year. That'd be kinda cool for Okafor and Ford to end up on the same team.
     
  10. smackpeddler

    smackpeddler Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2002
    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Payton trade was made to avoid the luxury tax. Basically the Sonics decided they would rather have Ray Allen at the max than the cap space to go after FA's like Brand, O'Neal, Arenas, etc. The 2nd part of the deal (Mason for #1) is pretty fair IMO.
    As far as the Bucks trading of Cassell, they basically did it to save 4 mill, Peeler is now a FA. They didn't view Cassell (33 yrs old) to be part of their future. They still have some bad contracts, but may have avoided the luxury tax and saved the Senator alot of money. I don't know that the move is that bad, I somewhat admire that they are willing to rebuild rather than simply be mediocre for the next 5 years.
     
  11. peleincubus

    peleincubus Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    26,741
    Likes Received:
    15,041
    i CANT believe that sam cassell is that old. time never stops i guess.
     
  12. bamaslammer

    bamaslammer Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,853
    Likes Received:
    4
    They took a chance by letting Cassell go that Payton would sign with them. In any case, they saved on the luxury tax bite they would've taken with both Payton and Cassell's weighty contracts and avoiding having two high dollar point guards on the roster in the decline of their careers. It opens up time for T.J. Ford to learn the job on the fly and allows Milwaukee some chance of getting out of salary cap hell while discarding some questionable personalities as well. I don't think the Bucks are stupid, I just think that fiscal issues overtook their judgement. Now if they managed to trade away Tim Thomas for expiring contracts, all of these moves would be a stroke of genius, allowing them to retool with some new free agents.
     
  13. DVauthrin

    DVauthrin Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 1999
    Messages:
    9,649
    Likes Received:
    8,003
    No, it moves forward for aliens like Sam.

    :D
     
  14. giddyup

    giddyup Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    20,466
    Likes Received:
    488
    Wasn't he a 24 YO rookie?
     
  15. leebigez

    leebigez Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2001
    Messages:
    15,812
    Likes Received:
    786
    The one player they made a big mistake on was Tim Thomas. He is the poster boy for potential. He had a good season going inot a contract yr coming off the bench under no pressure. Seattle gave him near max money even though they had a 20ppg player in Glenn Robinson ahead of him. The thinking was that he was a better player at 26 than Robinson was at 30. What they found out is that potential is what will land your team in lotto land. Toni ,the throw in wind up playing more significant minutes than Thomas. After that mistake, they compounded it by getting rid of one of the true pro's in Ray Allen. Some call him soft or whatever, but he's very productive and was one of their better playoff performers. Next , they give away one of the most underrated pg's since Derek Harper and Rod Strickland in Sam Cassell. All the guy does is run the offense, make big shots and stay out of trouble, not to mention he makes about 6m a yr. In return from the big 3 being broken up was Desmond Mason,Toni Kukoc,Joe Smith, and the draft pick Ford. This team was in the eastern conference final in 2000 and 3 yrs later, none of their leading scorer's or assist men are here.
     
  16. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,055
    Likes Received:
    15,229
    I don't think this was about luxury tax, which some respected posters are saying won't be a concern this next season anyway. I think they decided the whole team was crap and they had to blow it up and start over. They were very competitive not long ago and then suddenly -- in midseason and with the same players who once played so well -- they completely bombed. So, I think they decided the whole team needed to be broken up and rebuilt. But, I think trading away Ray Allen was a regrettable decision, much like Dallas trading away Jason Kidd when they were breaking up the 3 Js. Don't throw out the baby with the bathwater.
     
  17. leebigez

    leebigez Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2001
    Messages:
    15,812
    Likes Received:
    786
    I agree Juan, but like most teams, they didn't have a real plan after their visit to the ecf. Instead of keeping at least 2 of the big 3 then adding frontcourt help, they basically gave everyone away. For all their faults and Karl should take some blame also, Cassell,Robinson, and Allen were very effective together. Instead of trading some of their assets for frontcourt help, they traded them away for more guards. When they knew they wanted to get rid of Allen, why didn't they call Portland and offer a clean cut guylike Allen for frontline help like Wallace? How does a team of Cassell,Redd,Thomas and Wallace look in the east? The team basically gave away Cassell, but why not call GS who have a log jam and offer Cassell for Dampier and his contract which comes off the books after this season? That same 5m for Cassell, could have gotten you Kurt Thomas of NY. They're basically a rudderless ship with no cap room. In other words, thats one team you don't have to worry about making the playoffs next season in the east.
     
  18. Desert Scar

    Desert Scar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2000
    Messages:
    8,764
    Likes Received:
    11
    I predict a S&T with Payton for Fisher, #1 and another player (like Medvenko, Rush). Fisher isn't great, but he could help TJ as he gets adjusted is is probably better than other FA PGs for that level of money. The other part of the deal isn't great either--but put it all together and it is better than losing Payton for nothing. From the Lakers perspective they can then take their MCE and go for Malone, Brown, or Howard.

    I am not a huge Tim Thomas fan, especially at his price, but I'd still be very tempted to package like Cato and Mooch for him. To me it makes a lot of sense for both teams--then all we have to do this offseason resign Posey, find a back-up center and back-up two for a mil or two each (Mark Blount, Voskahl, Ward, etc).
     
  19. hooi

    hooi Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2002
    Messages:
    119
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think the Bucks should have done this a year earlier so they could have gotten LeBron James :D
     
  20. Baqui99

    Baqui99 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2000
    Messages:
    11,495
    Likes Received:
    1,231
    Basically, Milwaukee knew that it was time to start over from scratch. They built a team around the Big 3, and added pieces such as Anthony Mason to contend for the Eastern Conference title. What they ended up with was a soft, overpaid, shoot-first team that doesn't play any defense.

    That team was going nowhere, and they decided to start all over. They've already got their franchise PG in TJ Ford, who will start next year. TJ is the type of player that creates off the dribble, and makes other players better.
     

Share This Page