1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[HDTV] HD Better On Cable Than Satellite?

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by Faos, May 3, 2007.

  1. Faos

    Faos Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2003
    Messages:
    15,370
    Likes Received:
    53
    http://www.tvweek.com/news.cms?newsId=11987

    Comcast says so.

    Comcast Enters HD Quality Dispute


    By James Hibberd

    This week Comcast launched a major ad campaign that opened a new battlefront in the HD service provider war: comparative picture quality.


    Touting a study by Frank N. Magid Associates, Comcast took out full-page newspaper ads in 15 markets claiming its HD picture quality is superior to satellite competitors DirecTV and Dish.

    "We always knew we offered more HD choices, and we always thought we had more convenient HD service and better HD picture quality, but now we can prove it by a fairly overwhelming margin," said Page Thompson, senior VP and general manager of video services at Comcast.

    Though Comcast said the study has been long planned, the ads could be seen as a response to DirecTV's ongoing television campaign featuring celebrities touting the satellite provider's HD service as better than cable. Cable operator Time Warner has filed lawsuits over the DirecTV ads, claiming they're false advertising.

    "They're talking about service they'll have in the future because the product they have today doesn't compare," Mr. Thompson said.

    When DirecTV's campaign started late last year, the satellite provider initially claimed to have a superior HD picture quality. But a New York federal judge upheld Time Warner's objection to the seemingly unverifiable claim in February and the ad was changed. Current DirecTV ads claim the satcaster will "soon" have more HD channels than cable, a boast that has withstood a legal challenge.

    But while Time Warner was busy filing lawsuits, Comcast commissioned a study to try to prove, once and for all, who has the best picture.

    The study was conducted in March, with 309 subjects showed side-by-side images from DirecTV, Dish and Comcast on identical TV sets. To eliminate set bias, the HD signals were rotated among the sets. Subjects were shown various genres of programming from different networks.

    To help protect the study from legal challenges, Comcast tapped Magid to conduct the test; Accenture, a technology consulting company, to oversee the technical aspects; and Loeb & Loeb, a national law firm, for legal guidance on the survey process.

    The result: 66 percent preferred Comcast to DirecTV, and 70 percent preferred Comcast to Dish.

    A DirecTV spokesman questioned the validity of the results, noting there are several ways picture quality could be skewed: the equipment used, instructions given to subjects, the content chosen and whether the Comcast signal at the test location was representative of the cable operator's markets as whole.

    "There's not much substance here," spokesman Robert Mercer said. "While they're making claims about their signal clarity, the methodology of the survey seems questionable at best."

    Mr. Mercer added that an independent company surveyed home theater installers last year, who said, by a 4-to-1 margin, that DirecTV had the best signal quality.

    As for whether DirecTV will take the Time Warner route and file a lawsuit to halt the picture-quality claim, Mr. Mercer said, "We're evaluating our options."

    A Dish Network representative had no comment.

    In addition to the newspaper ads, Comcast plans a radio and online ad campaign to tout the results of its study.

    The Comcast ads were greeted with cheers from HD online fan communities-even from satellite subscribers-who are pleased that top-notch HD picture quality is becoming a point of contention among service providers.

    For years HD fans have debated the picture quality of HD providers. As bandwidth-strapped providers have added more HD networks to remain competitive, some sharp-eyed viewers claim signal compression is causing visible quality degradation.

    Though fans definitely want more HD channels, some say they do not want content at the expense of what made them fall in love with HD in the first place: its startling, lifelike images. Dismissive statements by service providers that all HD is the same, or that, as one DirecTV executive once put it, "Viewers don't watch the back of their TVs," have further frustrated fans.

    With Comcast, the country's largest cable operator, making picture quality a battleground issue, fans hope its competitors will soon follow suit.

    "I think it's outstanding Comcast did this," said one poster on AVS Forum.

    "As a DirecTV customer, this makes me very happy," enthused another.

    Comcast still must contend with DirecTV's planned barrage of 100 HD channels by the end of the year, though Mr. Thompson reiterated that quality matters more than quantity.

    "Our plan is to launch every HD channel that really matters to our customers," he said. "To put out an arbitrary number of HD channels without regard for the quality of the channels seems like a strange strategy.

    "In addition to the channels, we have 100 HD video-on-demand hours. We'll double that by the end of the year and double again by the end of next year."
     
  2. Gummi Clutch

    Gummi Clutch Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2002
    Messages:
    3,171
    Likes Received:
    27
    When is Time Warner going to switch to Comcast???

    Doesnt Comcast carry more NFL games than Time Warner?
    Do they have almost as many NFL games as Dish Network?

    Must... Get.... Sunday.... Ticket... (or equivilant, right now i got TWCHD)
     
  3. Master Baiter

    Master Baiter Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    9,608
    Likes Received:
    1,376
    I had Time Warner HD at my apartment and I just got Dish Network HD on Tuesday. Dish looks much better.
     
  4. gucci888

    gucci888 Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    17,227
    Likes Received:
    6,573
    I know Dish offers a bunch more HD channels than Time Warner.
     
  5. Rockets2K

    Rockets2K Clutch Crew

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2000
    Messages:
    18,050
    Likes Received:
    1,271

    really?

    can you tell me how many each has?

    according to article above, the claims that sat providers will soon have more are the only part of the dish claims that are true.

    ITs kinda a moot point with me, since until you can guarantee me that I will never lose dish signal during a Rockets game, Ill stick to the provider that has never let me down and forced me to miss a Rockets game.

    and yes...DirecTV has forced me to miss when I lost signal several tiimes during storms
     
  6. Master Baiter

    Master Baiter Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    9,608
    Likes Received:
    1,376
    No, it says that DirectTV will soon have more stations. Dish Network definitely has more HD stations than Time Warner. If you want to know exactly how many more, go to both of their websites and count.
     
  7. geeimsobored

    geeimsobored Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Messages:
    8,968
    Likes Received:
    3,389
    Dish Network definitely has more than cable. My parents, back home, switched to Dish Network from Time Warner and the quality is much better along with the amount of HD Channels.
     

Share This Page