1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Greg Buckner (maybe) or Reggie Evans?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Rockets34Legend, Jun 24, 2006.

  1. Rockets34Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    23,501
    Likes Received:
    21,682
    http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/nba/article/0,2777,DRMN_23922_4796130,00.html

    Nuggets guard Buckner is headed for free agency

    June 23, 2006

    Greg Buckner will be bound for free agency Monday.

    Steve Kauffman, Buckner's agent, reiterated Thursday that Sunday's deadline will pass without the Nuggets guard picking up his $1.8 million player option for next season.

    Kauffman said in April that Buckner wouldn't invoke his option.

    While Kauffman said no action is needed for Buckner to become a free agent, Kauffman plans to write the Nuggets a letter as a courtesy. Buckner can begin negotiations with any team July 1.

    "He's said before that he'd like to return (to Denver)," Kauffman said. "We'll find out July 1."

    Buckner, who averaged 6.7 points during his second season with the Nuggets, signed a two-year, $3.47 million deal last off-season.

    Because Buckner has Early Bird rights, the Nuggets will be able to exceed the salary cap to re-sign him up to about $5 million for next season.

    Other than Buckner, the Nuggets' unrestricted free agents will be forward Reggie Evans, guard DerMarr Johnson and guard Howard Eisley. Restricted free agents will be forwards Nene and Francisco Elson.
     
  2. rsx_htown

    rsx_htown Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    851
    Likes Received:
    13
    ball grabber no thx
     
  3. Drift Monkey

    Drift Monkey Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2006
    Messages:
    731
    Likes Received:
    124
    In more than one way?
     
  4. ClutchCityReturns

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,449
    Likes Received:
    2,720
    I've been thinking about taking Buckner for the small trade exception (not sure if it would have worked since there's a 200k difference) but as CD said it's really hard to pull something off with a TE. So, I'm actually pretty happy to see him opt out and hit the market. If we don't get Mike James and we decide to split the MLE, I'd love for him to be one of the players we pick up. He's athletic, shoots the 3 well, and is a very good defender at both the SG and PG spots. He would provide some nice depth for cheap.
     
  5. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,908
    Likes Received:
    16,469
    Why take Reggie Evans when we got Chuck Hayes?
     
  6. Shaq2Yao

    Shaq2Yao Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    8,977
    Likes Received:
    18,006
    Why not DerMarr Johnson. He is tall/atheletic/young, and has a good 3PT shot.
     
  7. jopatmc

    jopatmc Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    15,370
    Likes Received:
    390
    Buckner would be decent off the bench, good defender, and okay 3 point shooter, good a/t ratio. I'd take him for the smaller $1.6 TE, but why would Denver do this?
     
  8. ClutchCityReturns

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,449
    Likes Received:
    2,720
    He's passing on his player option and entering free agency. We would have to pick him up with part of the MLE. In my opinion, this would only be if Mike James (or another full-MLE type guy) weren't attainable. If that's the case, I'd probably split it up between two of the three out of Bucker, Rasual Butler, and Jay Williams. I have no idea what the market is for Rasual or Jayson, but maaaaaybe we could swing all 3. Buckner obviously wants more than 1.8, unless he's doing this solely to change scenery. The MLE is supposedly going to be like 5.5, right? So maybe 2.0 for Buckner, 2.0 for Butler, and 1.5 for Williams? That'd be pretty sweet.
     
  9. high5

    high5 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2006
    Messages:
    265
    Likes Received:
    0
    No reason to split MLE while we have our $4.2M TE available for S&T.

    And instead of Rasual Butler, I'd go for Jumaine Jones.
     
  10. ClutchCityReturns

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,449
    Likes Received:
    2,720
    I'm going off what CD said a couple of days ago about TE's being a lot more useful at the trading deadline. He sounded as if using them in the offseason would be a longshot.
     
  11. high5

    high5 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2006
    Messages:
    265
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hmm... interesting.

    You'd figure team(s) would rather end up with TE rather than seeing their player(s) leave for nothing.

    But I agree with what you said, that we should split our MLE only if James proved to be unattainable.
     
  12. ClutchCityReturns

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,449
    Likes Received:
    2,720
    I've had the same thought. For a second just pretend we had a trade exception that was whatever Buckner wants (let's say 2.5 mil). What do the Nuggets get if they let him walk? Nothing, except they open up a roster spot. Now, what do they get if they sign him and then trade him to us for our TE? Well, they get a 2.5 TE and clear that same roster spot.

    Maybe there's a reason and we're just not seeing it, but again, I don't understand the thinking either.
     
  13. m_cable

    m_cable Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2002
    Messages:
    9,455
    Likes Received:
    73
    I bet williams could be had for the minimum. He's probably looking for a guaranteed contract over anything else. I mean it's not as if he's that much in demand. He had a couple of workouts a few weeks ago, but I haven't heard anything since.

    Depending on need, if we miss out on James, but still need a PG to round out our rotation, I'd go for Speedy Claxton next.

    Otherwise if we don't draft a SG, then a dual Buckner/Rasual Butler signing wouldn't be a bad combo. They'd be an offense/defense pairing that could give us some good flexibility.
     
    #13 m_cable, Jun 24, 2006
    Last edited: Jun 24, 2006
  14. ClutchCityReturns

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,449
    Likes Received:
    2,720
    Agreed on Claxton.

    As far as Williams goes, I know it's not much of a sign, but it seems that a lot of other NBA fans would really like to see them on their own team after seeing that he was coming back and not looking too bad in doing it. If that means GM's are interested, who knows. I would expect there's competition for him at the minimum though, so I don't see him getting signed for that. What is the minimum these days anyway? 700k or so?

    By the way, do you have any idea as to why a team like Denver wouldn't want a TE for Buckner in a S&T? Seems like they should want to do it, no? (btw, I'm not talking about us getting him...he'll ask too much for our 1.6 and too little for our 4.2).
     
  15. smoothie

    smoothie Jabari Jungle

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    6,947
    i think it's a sure thing that MJ wants to come back here for the MLE, and JVG says he would be ok with having MJ back, so i'm bettign that happens until i hear otherwise.
     

Share This Page