1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Glitch could force North Carolina to vote again

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Troy McClure, Nov 10, 2004.

  1. Troy McClure

    Troy McClure Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    655
    Likes Received:
    0
    Glitch could force state to vote again

    MICHELLE CROUCH

    Staff Writer


    More than 4,500 votes irretrievably lost in coastal Carteret County could trigger a new statewide election if the official margin of victory in two Council of State races is close enough, state election officials said Monday.

    The problem, which one expert called one of the worst election glitches nationwide, occurred on a machine that wasn't set correctly.

    "This is one of the few cases in which the votes were totally lost," said David Dill, founder of the Verified Voting foundation.

    The votes, all early ballots, could affect the races for superintendent of public instruction and agriculture commissioner, both too close to call Monday.

    Counties will add totals from as many as 75,000 provisional ballots to their returns today. If the final margin in any race is within 4,532 -- the number of lost votes in Carteret -- the losing candidate can file a protest with the N.C. State Board of Election.

    It's unclear what would happen in that case. Attorneys are studying whether the board could call a new election in Carteret County only, or even ask the disenfranchised voters to vote again. (Local elections officials have their names.)

    But state law may not allow that: "The new election shall be held in the entire jurisdiction in which the original election was held," it says. That could mean the whole state.

    Gary Bartlett, the state board's executive director, did not know Monday if the state has ever had to redo a statewide election; it hasn't happened in recent memory. A second election would cost between $2.5 million and $3.5 million, he said.

    "We've had some machine discrepancies in the past, but none has ever impacted the result of the election," Bartlett said.

    The maker of Carteret's push-button voting machines, UniLect Corp., acknowledges it told county officials the machines would hold more than 10,000 votes. The machines actually held 3,005 because the computer software had not been updated.

    "It was a simple mistake, one that could be fixed with a simple two-second key stroke," said Jack Gerbel, the company's president. "None of our customers have ever lost even a single vote, and now this."

    Gerbel said the machines flash a warning message when there is no more room for storing ballots. "It was either ignored or overlooked," he said.

    Bartlett said Carteret County elections officials have sworn the message never appeared.

    Gerbel said his company is looking for a way to stop the machines from accepting votes after the memory is full.

    http://www.charlotte.com/mld/charlotte/10133265.htm
     
  2. ROCKSS

    ROCKSS Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 1999
    Messages:
    7,563
    Likes Received:
    8,115
    Troy - why dont you create one post and show all this info in it. You seem to not want this election to be over, which is cool, but how about consolidating all this info into one.
     
  3. Troy McClure

    Troy McClure Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    655
    Likes Received:
    0
    What the **** are you talking about ?

    I made a thread telling Kerry to concede ( because he does read this baord after all).
     
  4. ima_drummer2k

    ima_drummer2k Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    36,432
    Likes Received:
    9,380
    Sweet! More votes for Bush!
     

Share This Page