As a moderate, I'd be inclined to take Rudy over Hillary. Personally, I don't trust her, as she changes her positions as she sees convenient and is your typical power hungry politician. She doesn't have the character and leadership that Bill had, and is your typical bureaucrat. That said, I would take Rudy over Hillary. My first choice is still Barack Obama, but he's got less than a 50% shot at winning the nomination. If John Edwards is there, I take him too. But I just can't bring myself to vote for Hillary Clinton.
That's like asking if I want to get poked in the left eye or the right eye. Honestly, what are the policy differences between Rudy and Hillary?
I'm starting to change my mind on national health care -- which was a big reason I used to oppose Hillary.
I am voting for Bloomberg (if he runs), Hillary is not to be trusted and Rudy is pushing this bullcrap politics of fear.
Giuliani: "I was there at 9/11" instant millions of votes Hillary: "My husband did good when he wuz in office lolz" instant millions of votes I'd pick neither..3rd party if they do get nominated
Actually if those 2 get the nominations, it shows how stupid the American people are, that they couldn't nominate anyone better than that to run for President.
Neither of them will get nominated, IMO. Democrats are crushing the Republicans in the money race this year. CRUSHING them. It is their race to lose.
Wouldn't changing positions when convenient, typical power hungry politician, lacking character and leadership of Bill Clinton apply to Giuliani too?
No doubt Democrats have some significant money advantages so far, but you will still only have one Rep, one Dem in the end. There is still a lot of time between now and the election.
