1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Fun Hypothetical Question: Rockets vs. Bulls in '94 and '95 Finals

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by ClutchCityReturns, Mar 1, 2007.

  1. ClutchCityReturns

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,427
    Likes Received:
    2,666
    Obviously we've all thought about how a Rockets/Bulls match up in the NBA Finals would have played out either of the years that we won it all. Most of the time the question is whether or not you think the Rockets would have beaten them. So, I put a bit of a twist on that question...

    If you had the chance, would you...

    A) Keep both championships. You don't care at all that we never got to "prove" ourselves against the Bulls and that a vast amount of people (idiots) will forever put an asterisk next to our titles.

    B) Put one of the two titles on the line to see how things would have turned out. Basically, this is a fantasy scenario...but imagine you could gamble one of our titles in order to somehow see who would have won the series. If we lose, that championship is nullified (yet we keep the other one), but if we win, the whole "asterisk" perspective can be partially squashed.

    C) Put both of the two titles on the line to see how things would have turned out. Another fantasy scenario, just like option B, but it involves both championships. If you gambled them, you'd get to see how both the '94 and '95 Finals would have gone if we played the Bulls those years. You run the chance of beating them twice, once, or losing both of our titles in the process. Very risky, but this is the only way to prove once and for all, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that the Rockets didn't just win their titles because Michael was on vacation. On an individual level, such success against MJ in the Finals could have vaulted Hakeem to even greater heights.


    I know a lot of people will probably choose A. That's ok, but I also know that the chance to prove ourselves against the Bulls, or even just to witness a Finals series against them, would be too good an opportunity to pass up.

    So...What's it gonna be?



    (I would like to thank John F****** Stockton and his 30 foot three-pointer for making this thread necessary. Honorable mention goes to Karla Malone for molesting Clyde Drexler.)
     
  2. armyman789

    armyman789 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    342
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would put both on the line but just to be on the safe side I would only put one of them. Just the thought of this intrigues me because it would be like muhammad ali V george forman.
     
  3. NewYorker

    NewYorker Ghost of Clutch Fans

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2002
    Messages:
    6,130
    Likes Received:
    41
    I say put both on the line.

    Maybe we lose one, maybe both - but for the chance to be the Unbeatable Bulls and be the only team in history to have knocked them off - that's too much to pass up.

    We always have to live with people dogging us for saying - yeah but Jordan was out those two years.

    How awesome would it be to have been the only team to knock them out. Jordan once said he wished he had a chance to play against the Rockets in the finals - that was the team he wanted to play. Wow, it woud have been special.

    Man, do I hate Utah.
     
  4. rockets-#1

    rockets-#1 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,895
    Likes Received:
    9
    I'd put both up. The Rockets usually beat the Bulls back then, and they would have beaten the Bulls if they had made it to the Finals.

    Also, everyone always forgets that Michael was around in '95. He might not have played a full season and might not also have been in the best of shape, but it's MJ in the playoffs. He never stops trying. Yet, the Magic beat them, and the Rockets beat the Magic.
     
  5. VicVictory

    VicVictory Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    505
    Likes Received:
    0
    IMO, This was my dream finals matchup. The man who made me a basketball fan against my hometown team. Too bad it never happend. And I know that the Rockets had the Bulls number in the regular season, but "Playoffs" Jordan is a totally different person. To sum it up, I wouldn't put my money on either team because any one of them can win it all. I just don't see Jordan losing a Finals match up.

    You never know. If MJ never retired, The Bulls might have took our titles, or atleast give our toughest challenge in seven games.
     
  6. LoneStarDawg

    LoneStarDawg Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    99
    I know this isn’t an option, but I’d like to see the Bulls put their ‘93 title on the line against the Rockets.

    If you remember, that was the year when there was a “questionable incident” in the last regular season game against the Spurs that cost the Rockets the home court advantage against Seattle in the 2nd round in which the home team won every game.

    We swept that the Bulls in the regular season that year and split with the Phoenix Suns (although two of those losses came early when the team was still adjusting to Rudyball).
     
  7. cannonjb123

    cannonjb123 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2007
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Where is the no one cares its in the past option. Teams that live in the past are currently sucking or will suck in the near future.
     
  8. ClutchCityReturns

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,427
    Likes Received:
    2,666
    I put it right below the "I like to hate on threads that are just for fun. Especially when they actually say 'Fun' in the title" option.

    By the way, I don't think anyone on this forum plays for the Rockets, so how is a discussion about the past going to have any effect on future championships? Yeah...that's what I thought.
     
  9. sammy

    sammy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2002
    Messages:
    18,949
    Likes Received:
    3,528
    You had to remind me! I was only 10 and at Auchan watching the game while my parents were shopping. I hate David Robinson!!
     
  10. jordan_123

    jordan_123 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2007
    Messages:
    316
    Likes Received:
    0
    not sure about that man.michael is a different beast in the playoff .not in best of shape makes a big difference believe me.those turnovers that he made,those easy baskets that he missed are only because he was out of shape.without a doubt houston deserves both titles but i wish they would have played the bulls in the finals against the greatest basketball player that have ever play the game.olajuwon was top 2 center along with shaq but man jordan is something else everyone have to admit it .
     
  11. ClutchCityReturns

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,427
    Likes Received:
    2,666
    Am I mistaken, or weren't Jordan's playoffs #'s higher across the board in '95, when compared to '96 (when they won 72 games and the title)? Personally, I don't buy the "he was out of shape and rusty" argument.

    I'd love to have it explained to me though.
     
  12. T_Man

    T_Man Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2000
    Messages:
    6,863
    Likes Received:
    2,888
    In the famous words of Daffy Duck!!!

    [​IMG]

    Mine!! Mine!!! All Mine!!!
     
  13. saleem

    saleem Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2001
    Messages:
    30,273
    Likes Received:
    14,712
    I have always felt that the 95 Rockets could have beaten Jordan and the Bulls if he had not retired in the first place.
     
  14. Lynus302

    Lynus302 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    6,382
    Likes Received:
    199
    Dream was the same way. Look it up: Dream's numbers went up significantly in the playoffs.

    The Bulls lack of a 4 hurt them every bit as much as MJ retiring: 91-93 they had Ho Grant. 96-99 they had Rodman. Both perfect role-players for those teams. Grant was on a mission in 1995 for Orlando. He had a ton to proove against the Bulls for trading him.

    I pick the Rockets both years, and in '93 and '97, too. F*cking Sonics and Jazz....
     
  15. tinman

    tinman 999999999
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 1999
    Messages:
    104,299
    Likes Received:
    47,185
    http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/bk/bkn/3221857.html
    "There should be no doubt or label of fluke on our championships," said Hakeem Olajuwon. "As for Michael Jordan, a lot of people don't know and never looked up our matchups with Chicago during that time. If you check the records, you'll see that we beat them on a consistent basis when Michael was playing and winning his first three championships.

    "(Vernon) Maxwell guarded Michael and gave him problems. In '95, we would have had Mario Elie on him. They didn't have anyone who could contain me. Chicago was never a problem for us. We always looked forward to playing them. A lot of people don't realize that."

    The Rockets, in fact, had a 5-1 record vs. Jordan and the Bulls from 1991 through 1993, the span of Chicago's first "three-peat."
    [​IMG]
     
  16. vj23k

    vj23k Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2000
    Messages:
    5,351
    Likes Received:
    46
    If I remember correctly, all of of his playoff numbers except for one from that year were up or on par with his numbers from the second three-peat. The one stat that was way off was turnovers.
     
  17. NewYorker

    NewYorker Ghost of Clutch Fans

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2002
    Messages:
    6,130
    Likes Received:
    41

    I think so too - but no one other then a Rockets fan would agree. I think we could have taken them in '95, maybe not '94, but definitely '95. that team was one of the greatest teams ever - we were suppose to lose every series, and yet won them all.

    Rockets fans, this is our pain, that we have to hear others think we're crazy and will always say we got lucky.
     
  18. OddsOn

    OddsOn Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2003
    Messages:
    2,555
    Likes Received:
    90
    We so would have rolled the mighty, mighty Bulls. MJ was scared of Hakeem blocking his stuff.
     
  19. Chronz

    Chronz Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    814
    Likes Received:
    11
    Dude you gotta put both on the line, if you lose one whats to stop people from saying youd lose both. Or am I misunderstanding the question
     
  20. johnrox

    johnrox Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,058
    Likes Received:
    0

    i agree, but if kenny or was it maxwell could have hit that 3 in the corner with 30 seconds to go, rox would have been right there.

    i would put both up. everytime rox played the bulls it was always great. really a shame jordan had to retire.
     

Share This Page