1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Francis signing puts Lewis' asking price in perspective

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by SA Rocket, Aug 26, 2002.

  1. SA Rocket

    SA Rocket Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2001
    Messages:
    1,064
    Likes Received:
    3
    OK,Steve signs for 6 more years at $80+ million.

    Rashard is asking for 7 years at $90 million and is refusing 7 years at $60 mil plus $15 mil in incentives.


    Is it just me or is it perfectly clear now that Rashard shouldn't be asking anything remotely close to what Steve deserves? Rashard =Steve???? :eek:

    Even those of us that would love to see Lewis on the Rockets should be screaming at him,"Rashard,get on up to Seattle and sign NOW,before they realize how much they offered you"!!

    But I guess if he thinks he deserves Kobe money,this ain't gonna change his mind.:rolleyes:
     
  2. kuj007

    kuj007 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    It'd be nice to add Shard's outside game to the Rox, but he's gonna need to put down the pipe before he suits up for anyone next season. He should take the $$ and run like hell.

    I'm happy for him that he's turned his draft day nightmare into something positive, and that he's turned into a decent pro. But he hasn't proved *anything* yet. He's had one good season.

    Rashard, you should kiss every one of those damn checks before putting in the bank.
     
  3. NJRocket

    NJRocket Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2001
    Messages:
    7,242
    Likes Received:
    27
    I agree...it does put it in perspective....Lewis should be happy getting the MCE based on what Francis got
     
  4. off_welfare

    off_welfare Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Messages:
    579
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah it sure does put it in perspective. He's not gonna sign with us hopefully! We have a championship caliber team:D
     
  5. leebigez

    leebigez Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2001
    Messages:
    15,812
    Likes Received:
    786
    Well, I think he deserves more than Lafrentz at 65mill. I think those incintives kinda make the players more selfish than thinking about the team.
     
  6. aznlincolnpark

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Messages:
    646
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think Lewis should get pay lesser than Fancis.. At least, Francis is an all-star player... Is Lewis of the all-star??
     
  7. WinkFan

    WinkFan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2002
    Messages:
    3,987
    Likes Received:
    96
    On the other hand, if MoT gets 7-8 million per year, why shouldn't Lewis expect at least that.
     
  8. SA Rocket

    SA Rocket Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2001
    Messages:
    1,064
    Likes Received:
    3
    Very true,which makes Seattle's offer seem fair to him and the team based on what he's done and will probably do for the team in the future.

    I can see where Lewis might hesitate signing that length at Seattle's price,thinking of the player he believes he WILL DEFINITELY be(in which case he'd end up underpaid). But the fact is,he isn't worth RIGHT NOW what he's asking for.

    So it seems he should either:

    1. take the long term security at Seattle's price and risk ending up underpaid,

    2. take a shorter deal at Seattle's price during which time he can develop into the max money player he believes he'll be,or

    3. re-sign for 1 year(or finish the current 1 year deal)and try again next year when there's more teams with money and see what his value is then.

    Bottom line still seems like Seattle's got a good handle on what he's worth RIGHT NOW to them.
     
  9. Will

    Will Clutch Crew
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    5,281
    Likes Received:
    10,221
    Look, a system with caps always distorts the gap between great and pretty good players. The better you are, the more you get paid, until you hit the cap, at which point there's no way to reflect your extra levels of talent. You can't deduce that Lewis isn't worth what he's asking. All you can deduce is that Francis is worth more than he's getting.

    Given this distortion in the system, the best salary strategy for any team is to combine two or three great players with easily replaceable role players. The great players produce more than they can be paid for, and the role players can be dumped whenever they get uppity (unless they play for the Rockets, in which case they get a six-year contract). The worst strategy is to have a team full of Lewises and Taylors and Catos, who get paid every penny they're worth, if not more, because they aren't great and yet (even in the case of Cato) aren't so easily replaceable.
     
  10. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 1999
    Messages:
    1,563
    Likes Received:
    190
    No deduction necessary.

    Lewis won't get a $90M contract because he is not worth $90M.

    Shake your Marxist tambourine all you want, but it won't change this simple fact.
     
  11. Rockets_Truth

    Rockets_Truth Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2002
    Messages:
    755
    Likes Received:
    6
    I think the Rockets should use the MCE to get a veteran backup guard like bryon russell and then we will be all set. We have more than enough talent in the front court, and a great starting back court. If we had a good backup guard along with moochwe would be major contenders in the play-offs imo.
     
  12. rockbox

    rockbox Around before clutchcity.com

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2000
    Messages:
    22,763
    Likes Received:
    12,497
    I have to disagree because it is a lot harder to find a decent big man than it is to find a good small foward.
     
  13. SA Rocket

    SA Rocket Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2001
    Messages:
    1,064
    Likes Received:
    3
    Interesting viewpoint Will. If I understand correctly,you're saying that players like Francis,Duncan,Kobe have a definite limit on what they get(regardless of how great they really are). At the same time,players in the middle or "good" range(Lewis,MoT,Cato)have no contractually "set" limit on pay,but instead are limited only by position demand and the "beauty in the eye of the beholder"syndrome,etc.

    So while it's obvious he's not of Steve's calibre or deserving of what Steve should get,there's no cap in place to say,"You're just a 'good' player and must get $6-8 million only". So Seattle could end up in a tough spot because they don't have a definite,young franchise player to set the bar.

    I'd still have no trouble saying Lewis isn't worth the max,even if it's only based on the principle that it's all Steve will get and he ain't Steve. But I see where you're coming from...and it sounds like you might be a lawyer?
     
  14. because24

    because24 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Messages:
    393
    Likes Received:
    13
    I agree with JOE FAN, Lewis is just not worth 90million, point blank.

    Quoted by Plankton
     
  15. CoPilot

    CoPilot Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Messages:
    218
    Likes Received:
    0
    Lewis should take the offer he has and thank god they offered him that


    I'll say it again and again
    :mad: WE DONT NEED LEWIS AT ALL :mad:
     
  16. Lobo

    Lobo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 1999
    Messages:
    499
    Likes Received:
    0
    Will, to take your logic one step further: over time, the Lewises, Taylors, and Catos of the league are going to find that teams don't want to pay them their $7-8 million anymore, instead using that money to help pay for their superstars. That means their asking price will have to drop if they are to continue playing.

    Sounds like Lewis really is overvaluing himself...
     
  17. Will

    Will Clutch Crew
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    5,281
    Likes Received:
    10,221
    Not a lawyer, sorry. Also not particularly talented at the tambourine.

    Lobo, I agree with you that over time, the availability of great players at cap level should drive down what teams are willing to pay for Lewises, Taylors, and Catos. But that assumes the availability of enough great players. Otherwise, with just a few great players to go around (as evidenced by that moment during every offseason when we realize that once again there are no franchise FA's to be had), the rest of the teams end up competing for just-pretty-good talent.

    SA Rocket, you also make a good point about competition by position. Cato will always be paid better than Francis on a per-output basis, not just because Francis is capped but because big men are rare. Cato doesn't have to compete with Francis. He just has to compete with Greg Ostertag.

    Like other guild systems, the NBA CBA is designed to reward not talent but tenure. Yao Ming won't be able to make top money till he's a decade older and possibly a step or two slower. It's the same old story: the old screw the young. America and China aren't so different after all.
     
  18. Easy

    Easy Boban Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    38,173
    Likes Received:
    29,652
    I think the rationalle behind the CBA tenure thing is to prevent unproven rookies to demand overblown salaries.
    Without the rookie salary scale, some unproven snobs would threaten to hold out until they get the money they want.

    After three years of service, a player pretty much has shown what he can or cannot do. The contract he get is supposed to be of fair market value.

    Players like Francis will have no problem getting the money after they pay their three year due.

    The problem with "the old screw the young" is with those over-the-hill players. It has to do with the difficulty of judging when a player's value will be diminished because of age. When you sign a 7-year contract with a 30 year old player in his prime, you are taking the risk of him significantly dropping his game after 4 year.

    Complicating the matter is the so-called "loyalty" crap. Old players almost always play the "I have given my life to this organization what have you given me" card.
     
  19. montgo

    montgo Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2000
    Messages:
    945
    Likes Received:
    0
    Seattle is in a very tough situation. They have no star player to sign to the max, other than Payton, but they have this very good player who wants the max. They would be best settled to let him go and let Mason take over, because Lewis will only create the Cato/Taylor affect for them....
     
  20. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,055
    Likes Received:
    15,229
    Marxist? :confused: Anyone else as confused as I am about how Lewis' value has anything at all to do with Marxism?
     

Share This Page