1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Fox: LA DHS prevented Red Cross from Accessing Superdome

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by basso, Sep 8, 2005.

  1. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,391
    Likes Received:
    9,309
    big difference between the state and federal DHS.

    http://www.radioblogger.com/#000967

    --
    On the Fox News Channel just a little while ago, Major Garrett, one of Fox's star reporters, and author of The Enduring Revolution, broke a very disturbing story for those on the left that want to play the blame game regarding the reaction to the Katrina. Here's his interview with Hugh Hewitt moments ago:

    HH: Joined now by Major Garrett, correspondent for the Fox News Channel, as well as author of The Enduring Revolution, a best seller earlier this year. We talked about that. Major Garrett, welcome back to the Hugh Hewitt Show.

    MG: Hugh, always a pleasure. Thanks for having me.

    HH: You just broke a pretty big story. I was watching up on the corner television in my studio, and it's headlined that the Red Cross was blocked from delivering supplies to the Superdome, Major Garrett. Tell us what you found out.

    MG: Well, the Red Cross, Hugh, had pre-positioned a literal vanguard of trucks with water, food, blankets and hygiene items. They're not really big into medical response items, but those are the three biggies that we saw people at the New Orleans Superdome, and the convention center, needing most accutely. And all of us in America, I think, reasonably asked ourselves, geez. You know, I watch hurricanes all the time. And I see correspondents standing among rubble and refugees and evacuaees. But I always either see that Red Cross or Salvation Army truck nearby. Why don't I see that?

    HH: And the answer is?

    MG: The answer is the Louisiana Department of Homeland Security, that is the state agency responsible for that state's homeland security, told the Red Cross explicitly, you cannot come.

    HH: Now Major Garrett, on what day did they block the delivery? Do you know specifically?

    MG: I am told by the Red Cross, immediately after the storm passed.

    HH: Okay, so that would be on Monday afternoon.

    MG: That would have been Monday or Tuesday. The exact time, the hour, I don't have. But clearly, they had an evacuee situation at the Superdome, and of course, people gravitated to the convention center on an ad hoc basis. They sort of invented that as another place to go, because they couldn't stand the conditions at the Superdome.

    HH: Any doubt in the Red Cross' mind that they were ready to go, but they were blocked?

    MG: No. Absolutely none. They are absolutely unequivocal on that point.

    HH: And are they eager to get this story out there, because they are chagrined by the coverage that's been emanating from New Orleans?

    MG: I think they are. I mean, and look. Every agency that is in the private sector, Salvation Army, Red Cross, Feed The Children, all the ones we typically see are aggrieved by all the crap that's being thrown around about the response to this hurricane, because they work hand and glove with the Federal Emergency Management Agency. When FEMA is tarred and feathered, the Red Cross and the Salvation Army are tarred and feathered, because they work on a cooperative basis. They feel they are being sullied by this reaction.

    HH: Of course they are. Now Major Garrett, what about the Louisiana governor's office of Homeland Security. Have they responded to this charge by the Red Cross, which is a blockbuster charge?

    MG: I have not been able to reach them yet. But, what they have said consistently is, and what they told the Red Cross, we don't want you to come in there, because we have evacuees that we want to get out. And if you come in, they're more likely to stay. So I want your listeners to follow me here. At the very moment that Ray Nagin, the Mayor of New Orleans was screaming where's the food, where's the water, it was over the overpass, and state officials were saying you can't come in.

    HH: How long would it have taken to deliver those supplies, Major Garrett, into the Superdome and possibly the convention center?

    MG: That is a more difficult question to answer than you might think. There were areas, obviously, as you approached the Superdome, that were difficult to get to, because of the flood waters. And as the Red Cross explained it to me, look. We don't have amphibious vehicles. We have trucks and ambulance type vehicles. In some cases, after the flood waters rose as high as they did, we would have needed, at minimal, the Louisiana National Guard to bring us in, or maybe something bigger and badder, from the Marines or Army-type vehicle. They're not sure about that. But remember, Hugh, we were transfixed, I know I was. I'm sure you were and your listeners were, by my colleague, Shep Smith, and others on that overpass.

    HH: Right.

    MG: ...saying, wait a minute. We drove here. It didn't take us anything to drive here.

    HH: Right.

    MG: Why can't people just come here?

    HH: I also have to conclude from what you're telling me, Major Garrett, is that had they been allowed to deliver when they wanted to deliver, which is at least a little bit prior to the levee, or at least prior to the waters rising, the supplies would have been pre-positioned, and the relief...you know, the people in the Superdome, and possibly at the convention center, I want to come back to that, would have been spared the worst of their misery.

    MG: They would have been spared the lack of food, water and hygiene. I don't think there's any doubt that they would not have been spared the indignity of having nor workable bathrooms in short order.

    HH: Now Major Garrett, let's turn to the convention center, because this will be, in the aftermath...did the Red Cross have ready to go into the convention center the supplies that we're talking about as well?

    MG: Sure. They could have gone to any location, provided that the water wasn't too high, and they got some assistance.

    HH: Now, were they utterly dependent upon the Louisiana state officials to okay them?

    MG: Yes.

    HH: Because you know, they do work with FEMA. But is it your understanding that FEMA and the Red Cross and the other relief agencies must get tht state's okay to act?

    MG: As the Red Cross told me, they said look. We are not state actors. We are not the Army. We are a private organziation. We work in cooperation with both FEMA and the state officials. But the state told us A) it's not safe, because the water is dangerous. And we're now learning how toxic the water is. B) there's a security situation, because they didn't have a handle on the violence on the ground. And C) and I think this is most importantly, they wanted to evacuate out. They didn't want people to stay.

    HH: Now off the record, will the Red Cross tell you what they think of Governor Blanco and Mayor Nagin?

    MG: No.

    HH: Will they tell you what they think about FEMA director Brown?

    MG: No.

    HH: Will they tell you any...will they give any advice of how to make sure this doesn't happen again?

    MG: Well, there is something, Hugh, that I think we have to be honest with ourselves about. New Orleans is a situation, because of its geography, utterly unique in America. We don't build cities in bowls, except there. This complicated the Red Cross efforts, and the FEMA efforts, from the start. In the mid-90's, the Red Cross opened a shelter in South Carolina that was eventually flooded. And there was a big controversy about that. After that, the Red Cross made a policy decision that it would never shelter, or seek to shelter, any evacuee from any hurricane, anywhere where flooding was likely to occur. High ground is where they were going to be, and where they were going to go. Well, that basically rules out all of New Orleans.

    HH: Sure. Does the Red Cross, though, assist in evacuation, Major Garrett?

    MG: Not under the state plan in Louisiana. And not very many other places, either, because again, the Red Cross is a responding private charity. It is not an evacuation charity. It does not assume, as you can well imagine, Hugh, the inevitable liability that would come with being in charge of evacuating.

    HH: How senior are your sources at the Red Cross, Major Garrett?

    MG: They're right next to Marty Evans, the president.

    HH: So you have no doubt in your mind that they have...

    MG: Oh, none. None. And I want to give credit to Bill O'Reilly, because he had Marty Evans on the O'Reilly Factor last night. And this is the first time Marty Evans said it. She said it on the O'Reilly Factor last night in a very sort of brief intro to her longer comments about dealing with the housing and other needs of the evacuees now. She said look. We were ready. We couldn't go in. They wouldn't let us in, and the interview continued. I developed it more fully today.

    HH: And the 'they' are the Louisiana state officials?

    MG: Right.

    HH: Now any in the 'they'...is the New Orleans' mayor's staff involved as well? Or the New Orleans police department?

    MG: Not that I'm aware of, because the decision was made and communicated to the Red Cross by the state department of Homeland Security and the state National Guard. Both of which report to the governor.

    HH: Do they have any paper records of this communication?

    MG: I did not ask that. It's a good question. I'll follow up with them.

    HH: I sure would love to know that. And if you get it, send it to me. We'll put it up on the blog. Major Garrett, great story. Please keep us posted. Look forward to talking to you a lot in the next couple of weeks on this story. Thanks for breaking away from the Fox News Channel this afternoon.
     
  2. langal

    langal Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2004
    Messages:
    3,824
    Likes Received:
    91
    If this is true - then that's a sad indictment of the state govt. I suppose the story is backed up by the president of the Red Cross herself.


    Then again - it's FOXNews so prepare to get flamed.
     
  3. Fatty FatBastard

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2001
    Messages:
    15,916
    Likes Received:
    159
    I saw this on CNN, as well. But I want to see a statement from the Red Cross on this issue.

    If it is true, what a deplorable thing to do to New Orleans. Sometimes, politics should never be brought into the equation.

    If people need help, you give it. The one shining point of Katrina may be the public outcry for abolishing Political Red Tape.

    And that is for BOTH political parties.
     
  4. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,391
    Likes Received:
    9,309
    seems like they denied the red cross access to incent those in the dome to leave, but failed to provide them with the means to do so.
     
  5. Fatty FatBastard

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2001
    Messages:
    15,916
    Likes Received:
    159
    I just keep hearing more and more about the history of corruption in Louisiana.

    This is complete hearsay, but I also was told that one of the reasons for Louisiana wanting to keep people out is that the corruption was so obvious, (especially with the $500 million sent to help with Hurricane evacuation and so forth, that had been sent from Bush Senior and Clinton,) that Louisiana didn't want the Feds to see anything relating to how those funds were appropriated.

    We'll watch how this turns out. But finger-pointing at this juncture seems premature. Let's salvage what we can from N.O. and proceed.

    Here's a question: If it does turn out that Louisiana has been misappropriating the funds that were sent to prevent this, how do you feel about giving Louisiana $100 Billion in Funding to rebuild?

    If the corruption turns out to be correct, I say let them fix it, themselves.
     
  6. Sishir Chang

    Sishir Chang Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2000
    Messages:
    11,064
    Likes Received:
    8
    This is the first I've heard of this story and am somewhat skeptical that there was any malicious intent involved. As a Red Cross volunteer who's worked at disaster sites I can comment on a few things.

    I find this part the hardest to believe and is what makes me skeptical. The Red Cross has a very strict policy of political neutrality so while it does work closely with FEMA the Red Cross wouldn't consider criticism of FEMA to be criticism of the Red Cross. The Red Cross at times have criticised FEMA themselves when they felt FEMA wasn't acting fast enough or were making things difficult for Red Cross operations. Its possible that individual Red Cross workers and volunteers might but what I know of the organization I find it very hard to believe that this would be a widely held belief.

    This part I find very believable because the Red Cross is very concerned about potential injury coming to Red Cross volunteers. Just speaking for myself I sometimes think they are too cautious. The Red Cross's mission isn't too rescue people but to provide care for people who are rescued and as such is very sensitive about workers and volunteers putting themselves in harms way. It wouldn't surprise me if the Red Cross commanders themselves held back sending in relief workers if they were told by local authorities the situation was very dangerous.
    All of this sounds right to me about the Red Cross.

    This is the first I've heard of it and I would be curious to see her full quotes to understand the context. My own view of this is that its possible that state officials told the Red Cross that the situation in New Orleans was very dangerous and that the Red Cross commanders agreed and held back their relief operation. This might've been a big miscalculation by the local officials and the Red Cross but I have a hard time believing there was any malicious or even negligent intent. What I'm guessing is that things were happening very fast and there was a failure to communicate or understand the gravity of the situation by all parties.

    What I believe this is really about is:
    as an attempt to shift blame away from the Repub. Fed. to the Dem locals. While I agree that the locals deserve a fair amount of blame I don't see how this excuses mistakes made at the Fed level. Since the Red Cross isn't a federal agency and this story says nothing about what FEMA or the National Guard under Fed control did.

    At the sametime though as I've said before I think there's too much recrimination going on. I think its obvious there were mistakes made at all levels and there will need to be accountability but its too soon to get a good picture of what happened.
     
  7. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now