1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Fact: Economic Growth Faster Under Democrats Since WW II

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by glynch, Oct 4, 2008.

  1. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,101
    Likes Received:
    3,610
    Now you have well financed and publicized theories/claims by economic conservatives and libertarians about lowering taxes leading to growth. Palin repeated this over and over.

    Facts are stubborn things. Not surprisingly equality increases along with economic growth under Democratic Administrations.

    .

    The table also shows that families at the 95th percentile ($180,000)fared almost as well under Republican presidents as under Democrats (1.90 percent growth per year, versus 2.12 percent), giving them little stake, economically, in election outcomes. But the stakes were enormous for the less well-to-do. Families at the 20th percentile fared much worse under Republicans than under Democrats (0.43 percent versus 2.64 percent). Eight years of growth at an annual rate of 0.43 percent increases a family’s income by just 3.5 percent, while eight years of growth at 2.64 percent raises it by 23.2 percent.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/31/business/31view.html
     
  2. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,101
    Likes Received:
    3,610
    We could sure use greater economic growth. Guess this is why the public wants the Democrats back in office.

    As the article says on the average we would have seen the economy grow an additional 9 plus percent if the Dems had been in the last 8 years.

    I guess it is telling when the GOP/conservatives cannot even spin the statistics to deny stronger growth during Democratic presidencies.
     
  3. weslinder

    weslinder Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    12,983
    Likes Received:
    291
    It's about economic policies, not D or R. Eisenhower spent us into a recession. Kennedy cut taxes harder than anyone, and the economy grew. Johnson spent us to the brink of recession, then pulled us off the gold standard and inflated the economy out of it. (War on Poverty = War on the Poor) Johnson screwed up the economy bad enough for the next three Presidents. Reagan cut taxes and opened up trade markets, and the economy grew. Bush I went to war and raised taxes and we had a recession. Clinton signed NAFTA, opened up trade relations with China, and the economy grew. Then Bush went to war and spent us into a recession again.
     
  4. DonkeyMagic

    DonkeyMagic Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    21,604
    Likes Received:
    3,487
    oh wes...like the blind sheeple would every agree with such a rational statement.

    It is a pitty most people have their heads too far up a political party's collective ass to actually think like this
     
  5. rimrocker

    rimrocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 1999
    Messages:
    23,182
    Likes Received:
    10,321
    I agree it is about economic policies. However, the distinction you're making is absurd. Over the last 40 years at least, the economic policies enacted under Republican Presidents have been decidedly R in nature.
     
  6. Bogey

    Bogey Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    2,251
    Likes Received:
    118
    Who controlled congress during those time periods?
     

Share This Page