1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[ESPN.com] Owner making mess of Hawks' offseason

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by RocketsMVP, Aug 5, 2005.

  1. RocketsMVP

    RocketsMVP Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2005
    Messages:
    450
    Likes Received:
    1
    http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/columns/story?columnist=stein_marc&id=2125662&num=1

    By Marc Stein
    ESPN.com

    There can only be one outcome in the Joe Johnson-to-Atlanta saga.

    There can only be one outcome, that is, which spares the Hawks from irreparable damage as opposed to their usual doses of mere empty-arena humiliation.

    The Hawks have to emerge from this nightmare with Johnson as their point guard … and with Steve Belkin stripped of any decision-making power.

    The Joe Johnson snafu would be bad news for Hawks fans ... if there were any.

    It is no longer enough for the Hawks to simply push the trade through, which is what everyone close to the deal -- except Belkin, of course -- still nervously hopes for by sometime next week.

    On top of completing a trade that was agreed to days ago, Atlanta must oust Belkin, buy him out, impeach him as team governor. Whatever.

    Belkin, as the Hawks' representative on the NBA Board Governors, was given final say on player signings and trades when the new three-pronged group assumed control of the franchise March 31, 2004. Not every team empowers its governor in this manner, but Belkin -- in what ranks as a swap of monster significance given how far Atlanta has fallen -- is refusing to sign off on a sign-and-trade with Phoenix that has the support of everyone else in the organization who matters.

    Only now there's more at stake than sabotaging a deal that would bring the moribund Hawks a young, promising free agent who A) plays three positions and B) actually wants to play in Atlanta.

    If Belkin stays, who is going to be willing to do business with the Hawks?

    How will Hawks general manager Billy Knight be able to convince his front-office counterparts that any future trade will reach done-deal status if the Hawks' governor, acting in opposition to everyone he works with, reserves the right to back out at the last minute?

    It doesn't really matter whether Belkin's belief that Atlanta has overextended for Johnson, who's not yet a proven franchise player, is someday proved correct. When you're a bad team with little to offer apart from money, especially for as long as the Hawks have been bad, you have to overextend sometimes. It's the only way to get players who might be able to stop the losing, and it's certainly preferable to running a team Donald Sterling style, in which an all-set deal gets undone at the last minute by the meddlesome boss.

    Johnson is a restricted free agent who had been preparing for weeks to sign a five-year Hawks offer sheet worth $70 million, with a balloon payment of $20 million up front. The Suns, in turn, had been planning for weeks to match the offer, until Johnson implored managing partner Robert Sarver last Thursday not to match it -- a request Johnson revealed the following day to ESPN.com while in Toronto for teammate Steve Nash's charity game.

    Phoenix then changed course and decided that $70 million is a steep price for a player who doesn't want to be in Phoenix, especially with a slew of big contracts already on the books. So Suns president Bryan Colangelo, unwilling to lose a prized asset without compensation, struck a sign-and-trade arrangement with Knight to send Johnson to Atlanta for Boris Diaw, two conditional first-round draft choices and a trade exception worth nearly $5 million. The deal appealed to Knight because it ensured that the Hawks would get their man, without having to sign Johnson to an offer sheet, wait seven days and risk coming away with nothing.

    Belkin, though, says Knight is parting with too much, in addition to the money promised Johnson. Overriding the overwhelming majority in his organization on a technicality, Belkin won't give his GM the go-ahead he needs based on the Hawks' power structure. (It must be said, though, that Belkin holding veto power when he's not the majority owner means the rest of Atlanta's, uh, brain trust has some explaining of its own to do.)

    It has been suggested in Atlanta that Belkin, who has been feuding for months with the other two main factions in the Hawks' ownership ranks, is delaying the trade in an attempt to sweeten the buyout package he'd receive from the owners who want to remove him. Yet that assumes his main motivation is money.

    Others who know Belkin well suggest otherwise. They note that Belkin has dreamed of NBA ownership for years, winding up with the Hawks only after a failed bid to buy the Celtics in partnership with Larry Bird. It's difficult to imagine, given the negative publicity from this flap, that the league would let him back in as an owner in another city … or that he could even find new partners to make a run at another team.

    This, then, is looking like Belkin's NBA Alamo, which explains why he's fighting his ouster so stubbornly. Upon learning that the rest of the Hawks' ownership was planning a Friday vote to strip Belkin of his governor privileges, the Bostonian filed a restraining order in a Massachusetts court. That court is demanding that the Hawks "desist and refrain" from voting Belkin out until a Tuesday morning hearing.

    Little wonder one Hawks insider expects "this thing gets worse before it gets better."

    How bad can it get? If the Johnson deal falls through, one scenario could find the Hawks scrambling to give away some $12 million in a combination of one-year deals just to get to the league-mandated minimum of $37.125 million in salaries for next season.

    Yet that would only be the start of the misery if Belkin wins the battle. The Hawks will never have a hope of attracting decent talent, and thus a decent crowd to Philips Arena, if executives and agents out there can't believe what Knight tells them.

    "Obviously," Hawks CEO Bernie Mullin said at a Thursday news conference, "it's a concern at this point in time.

    "It's not a concern in the long term."

    Don't be surprised if NBA commissioner David Stern feels the need to intervene. The implication from Mullin, either way, is that the Hawks will survive this crisis by soon negotiating an end to the Belkin Era, or at the very least render him silent.

    As part of a group known as the Atlanta Spirit LLC, Belkin holds a 30 percent stake in the franchise. Representatives from the other two ownership entities -- who combine to control 70 percent of the Hawks -- publicly expressed confidence Thursday that the trade will be salvaged.

    Sources close to Johnson, meanwhile, insist the 24-year-old and his influential agent, Arn Tellem, still expect the trade to be rammed through.

    The Suns cling to the same expectation, having given Atlanta extra incentive by vowing to match and keep Johnson if Belkin forces the Hawks to back out of the trade in an attempt to revert to the original offer sheet.

    Not that the Hawks should really need any added motivation. If they hope to take their first firm step away from years of laughingstock status, they must know they cannot dare to lose the first marquee free agent in memory who says he longs to be a Hawk.

    They also have to see, even more clearly after this week, that an overcrowded boardroom can be far more dispiriting than a half-empty building. It can be downright destructive.

    Which is why overruling Belkin is only half of the project.
     
  2. foodworld

    foodworld Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    965
    Likes Received:
    4
    Two picks and Diaw is quite a lot to give up for another wing guy - esp. when it's unlikley that he'll be able to do what is asked of him, that is play point guard full-time.

    Belkin is handling the situation for was it is - a $70 million business deal. He thinks that if the Hawks hold out until the eleventh hour, the Suns will blink and not match. And if they don't, they go after other players (Curry, Chandler, Watson, etc.) that better address team needs.

    The fact is the Suns CAN'T match JJ, because if they do they'll be in luxury tax hell with an $80 million payroll for the forseeable future. If they didn't extend him last summer, perhaps he wasn't in their team's plans? I swear - THE HAWKS CAN GET HIM FOR NOTHING.

    That Belknin guy is a self-made billionaire, and I think he can play poker better than Billy Knight.
     
  3. KellyDwyer

    KellyDwyer Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2001
    Messages:
    3,660
    Likes Received:
    86
    Totally.

    This is just a horrible trade for both teams. It sucks terribly that Joe Johnson (who shows emotion twice a year) felt so horribly mistreated by the Phoenix Suns that he felt a need to turn down their 70-million, and it stinks that the Hawks are giving up so much for a player who isn't really going to change things for them.
     
  4. Puedlfor

    Puedlfor Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2000
    Messages:
    5,973
    Likes Received:
    21
    If the Hawks are just giving up Diaw and two later first round picks - that's not all that much is it?

    Phoenix is in quite the pickle. Keep him for that money, and get torn apart by the economic riptides of the luxury tax - or get back Boris Diaw and two non-lottery picks.
     
  5. KellyDwyer

    KellyDwyer Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2001
    Messages:
    3,660
    Likes Received:
    86
    It's more the money that gets to me. I know Redd/Allen/Hughes signed outrageous deals, but I can't get down with signing a wing player for that much money.

    And I can get down with just about anything.
     
  6. Puedlfor

    Puedlfor Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2000
    Messages:
    5,973
    Likes Received:
    21
    oh, the contract. Yes, that is silly. Cap space makes teams dumb.
     
  7. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    From everything I've read on here, it doesn't sound like next year's free agent class is anything to write home about. What else can Atlanta do? How many offseasons in a row have they had cap room with no one to fill it. At some point, you've got to start collecting some above-average players, even if it means overpaying for them.

    I think it's a good deal for them and is a step in the right direction. They could at least become somewhat interesting which is better than they've been in a while.
     
  8. foodworld

    foodworld Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    965
    Likes Received:
    4
    The Suns don't have many options in a sign-and-trade, because they have to trade with a team way under the cap; they can't add any more salary.

    So it's either Atlanta or New Orleans.

    Maybe the Suns can talk JJ into the Big Easy? I hear Jamaal Magloire is available.
     
  9. meh

    meh Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    16,191
    Likes Received:
    3,407
    I agree. The Hawks are making use of their cap space fairly wisely. Next year is just terrible for both FA and the draft. And there's a good chance one of the Hawks young players will command big bucks later. It's better to grab talent while you still have the capability. 5yrs/70 mil is overpaying for JJ. But it's certainly better than not signing anyone.

    The 2 1st rounders are hardly a big sacrifice. They're lottery-protected, and the trade value of low 1st rounders is pretty small. As evidenced by NY getting 2 in the Mohammad-Rose trade.
     
  10. canoner2002

    canoner2002 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2002
    Messages:
    4,069
    Likes Received:
    1
    Hawks should have offered the trade. Just make the $70 offer and dare Suns to match.
     
  11. tiger0330

    tiger0330 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2003
    Messages:
    4,759
    Likes Received:
    63
    You mean shouldn't have. I think thats exactly what the Hawks should do, call the Suns bluff and dare them to match.
     
  12. RocketFire

    RocketFire Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,170
    Likes Received:
    310
    Suns are just hoping that the trade goes through. They can't afford JJ and don't want to pay the TAX. Atlanta would be stupid to fall for the bluff, PHX saying we will match the offer if you don't accept the trade. Atlanta franchise is being run by monkey's.
     
  13. thacabbage

    thacabbage Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    6,993
    Likes Received:
    145
    That's how I feel. It's how I've felt on the majority of these deals, like Milwaukee resigning Redd for 90mill or whatever it was. Joe Johnson is a real nice player, better than most will give him credit for. After the Marbury trade, he averaged 25ppg on 46% shooting for quite some time. But don't fool yourself into thinking that he is worth the max or that he is going to make a difference. Atlanta is still going to suck. The problem is, you can't blame them or Milwaukee for overpaying. They have to do something. It's a vicious cycle. You can't just keep sucking every year, so you have to sign someone. There are very few true max worthy players out there and they almost always resign with their own team. That is why it is almost unfathomable that Houston has two of these guys at a young age.

    As far as the trade, it doesn't make sense for either team. Atlanta won't improve, but they have to do it. If you're Phoenix, you obviously have to match. How do you not match? Atleast trade him midseason or something.
     

Share This Page