They are on crack if we use our 1st pick on a PG. If there isn't a big man available, go for the best SF/SG on the board.
Enes Kanter... Looks like he's either going to be the next Dirk Nowitzki... or the next David Andersen.
Yeah, these guys clearly don't know what they're talking about. Kyrie may or may not be the best player in the draft, but it looks like the Cavs are set on taking him, so he should be first if this is a mock draft and not a top prospect board. Also, why would we take a point guard? This really reads like a prospect ranking than an actual mock draft.
This. Plus they have Biyombo going at 20. If Kanter, Valanciunas, or Biyombo are available at 14, you have to think that would be the pick.
i can actually see that happening. if utah wants kanter then the cavs are stuck with erving and no big guy worth taking at #4 to pair him with. take kanter #1 and you have irving, knight, or walker avalable at #4.
NBAdraft.net trolling for hits. Kanter at #1, us drafting a pg with Biyombo on the board, etc. Their raking in the hits from the "OMG look at this mock!!!" rubbernecking.
NBAdraft.net has always been a joke, when drafting with #1, you take the BPA. Their reasoning for this is also r****ded. Cavs won't reach with the #1 so that their #4 pick wouldn't reach. NBAdraft.net = run by a r****d.
I don't know if this was a troll of some kind; but either way I stopped after this comparison. http://www.nbadraft.net/players/deshawn-stevenson
LOL NBAdraft has been pretty accurate over the past years if you look at the history mock drafts they resemble the actual draft to a great extent.