Here's the most anti-climatic exclusive. I was watching something on E yesterday and it was interrupted for this announcement, but I completely forgot about immediately after. Jennifer Garner's Baby on Board by Marcus Errico May 7, 2005, 3:05 PM PT Jennifer Garner's next alias: mommy. The Alias star is expecting her first child, E! Online and E! News have confirmed. Multiple sources close to Garner and beau Ben Affleck say the actress is three months along. News of the pregnancy comes just two weeks after several published reports claimed the couple were engaged. According to E! Online columnist Ted Casablanca, Affleck flew Garner's kin from West Virginia to California in April for his leading lady's 33rd birthday party. The question subsequently was popped in private, Casablanca reported. At the time Affleck's rep, Ken Sunshine, described said reports as "garbage." On Saturday, Sunshine declined to address the baby news, saying "I never comment on [Affleck's] personal life." There was no immediate word from Garner's camp on the pregnancy or whether a ceremony was in the offing. Despite having a baby on board, Garner is still keeping to her schedule this summer. Her next big-screen project, Columbia Pictures' romantic drama Catch and Release, begins its two-month shoot next week in Vancouver. The film costars Kevin Smith, Juliette Lewis and Timothy Olyphant and marks the directorial debut of Erin Brockovich screenwriter Susannah Grant. But Garner's November due date could prove tricky for the Alias brain trust. While ABC's spy thriller is wrapped for the season (the finale airs May 25), the show has been picked up for the fall and is slated to resume production in July. Now, producers must decide how to deal with Garner's pregnancy, either by incorporating it into the show (remember, Sydney's eggs were harvested last season) or just try to hide it. Then again, considering the show's sky-high slinky outfit-to-episode ratio, a burgeoning belly would be hard to conceal. Further complicating matters, Garner performs most of her own stunts. Affleck, 32, and Garner costarred on screen together before coupling off--he was Daredevil to her Elektra in 2003's Daredevil. (His cameo in this year's Elektra wound up on the cutting-room floor, but is preserved for posterity on the DVD.) They finally went public with their much-rumored romance last fall at the World Series, when she was spotted snuggling Red Sox diehard Affleck at Boston's Fenway Park. Their pairing was alternately dubbed Garfleck and Bennifer II. But unlike the original Bennifer tandem of Affleck and Jennifer Lopez, the all-new edition prefers to fly under the radar. The World Series appearance aside, Garner and Affleck have generally managed to eschew being photographed together at red-carpet events. Garner was previously married to Felicity costar Scott Foley. They split in 2003, and their divorce was finalized in March 2004. They didn't have any children. The never-wed Affleck previously was engaged to Lopez. That relationship ended with the scuttling of their September 2003 nuptials. http://www.eonline.com/News/Items/0,1,16506,00.html?fdfour1
As if Alias didn't have enough creative problems already. I think J.J. Abrams might just wanna stick a fork in that show.
Well I am glad to hear this! All is right with the world EXCEPT that still does not change the fact that our Rockets are out of the playoffs!
She is one of the most overrated "HOT CHICKS".. IMO, she has a mouse face with horse teeth that sports a training bra..
Are you kidding me!?!?! How can one say Garner is a butterface. That is incomprehensible to me. One would have to be on crack to not want and hit that. Has anyone ever here seen her show or her in her part in Daredevil? She is freaking amazing!! And, I didn't know Afflect got her, too, lucky mother****er.
yea, garner is freakin hot... her face is one of her best features...you must be gay if you think she's not hot!
Uh nobody called her a butterface. I just posted that thing from fark because I have no photoshop skills. You see, the ugly guy there represents the lame-os on the "internets" who act like they are too good for certain hotties.
Here's what I have never understood about people, some say that "you must be gay if you think she's not hot!" (Watch that word around here BTW).... for a regular girl she is VERY good looking, but we are grading on a Hollywood scale here...lets say she's a 8 in the real world well that 8 MAGICLY becomes a 5 in Hollywood terms.. So to recap, in our world she is good looking, compare her to her peers... not so much.. It's like a good streetball player, sure it looks good on the playground, but put that same player in the NBA and they are out of their league- NO PUN INTENDED..
The only difference is, I would MUCH rather have a real life 8 than a Hollywood 8. Some people prefer the natural, classy look. That's why I think Garner is beautiful.
