1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Do you believe in Morey's ability to judge talent?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by meh, Feb 18, 2010.

?

Do you trust Morey's ability to judge talent?

  1. In Morey we Trust!

    111 vote(s)
    78.2%
  2. Sorry, but I just can't see how this trade is good for us

    31 vote(s)
    21.8%
  1. meh

    meh Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    16,233
    Likes Received:
    3,460
    For all the naysayers on the trade out there, this is the underlying question we have to ask ourselves.

    You can point to how much KMart has been sucking and injury prone. You can point to how we overpayed by giving up Landry. But to me, none of that matters. To me, it's a matter of whether this trade gives us the best possible roster for the next couple of seasons.

    Hence, it's really a matter of trust. Is KMart worth giving up the Knicks trade for? Is a starting PG on a 50-win team better than a 3rd stringer on the worst team in the NBA? The answer isn't always so obvious. :)

    Two things I personally ponder when looking at this.

    Fit - Is there really a better fit for Yao-led Rockets than Martin who is available? I can't really think of any. Of all the players that could potentially come, Butler, Iggy, Jamison, etc. none of them fit our half court system better than KMart. He is literally THE PERFECT PLAYER in the Adelman system and as a SG for Yao.

    Replacement value - Comparison to the Knicks trade. Should the Rockets have gone another route, what is the replacement for Martin? The answer is Battier/Budinger. Can you say, HUGE DOWNGRADE? What about obtaining a similar player through other means? Sharpshooting SG with 20ppg potential? Certainly not for MLE nor anything short of a top 5 pick.

    But what about replacing Landry? Well, I don't know. But assuming Yao comes back next year with Hayes backing up, and Scola plays 30-35mpg, the downgrade would be a backup PG playing 10-15 mpg. Let's face it, a player who can contribute for that role can be found in the mid-1st rounds, or with part/full MLE. Hence, Landry is easily replacable.

    Of course, we also have to take into account Jordan Hill and potentially 2 picks from NY. But if they were really lottery protected as NY insisted, or if NY do at least get Wade OR Lebron(don't even need both), their picks will be crap anyway. Potentially even worse than the Rockets given how awful the East is. As Morey demonstrated, low 1st round picks are easily replacable by buying high 2nd rounders.
     
  2. JCDenton

    JCDenton Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,098
    Likes Received:
    274
    Not anymore.

    Would you trade Landry + Hill + first rounder + chance to swap first rounders for Kevin Martin?

    It's almost comical when you think of how badly Morey the Moron ruined our franchise.
     
  3. jevjnd

    jevjnd Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2002
    Messages:
    1,496
    Likes Received:
    258
    I think that you're failing to see the big picture. First, Martin is incredibly injury prone, or would you try to have us believe that wrist injuries to a pure shooter who coincidentally has been on the decline don't matter? It's not that Landry isn't impossible to replace, but why mess with the chemistry for a injury-prone player? Are you one of those that's really banking on Yao bringing a championship? That's a crapshoot to say the least. You can't ask everyone to just look at things your way while just ignoring everyone else's concerns, as it just doesn't work that way. Can Morey judge talent? Sure, he's proven it. Is Morey perfect? No one is. For now all that we can do is predict what's going to happen, but you just as the rest of us, have your own take on this. Understandably then, so do we.

     
  4. meh

    meh Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    16,233
    Likes Received:
    3,460
    Depends on what you think of Martin. Like I said, it's about what you think of Morey's talent evaluation. Not whether you or I think about the players themselves.
     
  5. HI Mana

    HI Mana Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Messages:
    1,456
    Likes Received:
    1,158
    Let's see if the Kings really do get all of that from the Knicks. My hunch is that the Knicks never got close to offering that much; Walsh probably talked it over with Dolan and never got the approval to give away all of that. I would imagine that the final proposal likely would have had lottery protection on all the picks, which devalues the package quite a bit.
     
  6. SuperBeeKay

    SuperBeeKay Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Messages:
    6,185
    Likes Received:
    258
    So you wanted an unproven PF in a position we were formerly stacked in (with Landry) for a first round pick that doesn't really guarantee anything? We would also have to wait for the first rounder to pan out, and hope that a big name Fa signs here (which isn't a given at all by the way).

    He isn't a moron; if anything your the one lacking common sense.
     
  7. roslolian

    roslolian Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    31,276
    Likes Received:
    21,407
    ??? The talks stalled because of protection. If the Knicks had agreed to the pick swap and non-protected draft pick then we would have taken it. The irony is we still have Kenny Thomas's expiring contract left. The Knicks just care about getting rid of Jeffries' deal, flipping Thomas for Jeffries could net us Hill and maybe a protected pick in the future. What would you say if we end up with Hill, a pick and Martin for Landry and Tmac?
     
  8. choujie

    choujie Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2002
    Messages:
    7,389
    Likes Received:
    77
    that's actually not the case. The pick was for taking Jeffries's contract. And Walsh seems to changed his mind of dealing Hill.

    Taking Hill + future 1st rounder +Jeffries's contract means no hope for contending in the near future and start rebuild after next year.

    Taking Kmart means they are pushing for something big next year, with the addition of another MLE player and keep both Lowry/Scola.
     
  9. crimmy88

    crimmy88 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2007
    Messages:
    4,962
    Likes Received:
    39
    we're probably in a win-now mode. Yao isnt getting any younger folks.
     
  10. abc2007

    abc2007 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    8,303
    Likes Received:
    64
    True. I just don't understand why so many fans here cannot see it. Why do they want to wait one more year?!

     
  11. JCDenton

    JCDenton Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,098
    Likes Received:
    274
    Am I lacking common sense or are you an impatient little baby? A team paying Yao big money is NEVER winning a title. We will be paying Yao big money next season. So enjoy the 50-55 win 5th seed performance and getting knocked out in the first or second round, because we just threw away the future to get it.

    At around the time those picks panned out (along with this year's) our young core would have been peaking. Add their affordable contracts to some cheap rookie deals and there would have been plenty of cap space to bring in some great players to an already solid team.

    Now we will get to watch Yao and Kmart decline and never win anything, after which our team will suck. If prime Yao and T-mac couldn't do it, peg-leg Yao and Captain Hook K-mart certainly aren't going to do it. Great move filling out the team with two crippled "stars" instead of young, cheap, talented players.
     
  12. Cohete Rojo

    Cohete Rojo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,344
    Likes Received:
    1,203
    Classic post, man. I love it. Now, where are all them Chinese dudes to come in and tell us we can make fun of T-Mac but not Yao?
     
  13. OremLK

    OremLK Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    20,998
    Likes Received:
    19,461
    Sergio Rodriguez is the dark horse in this deal. He might have secretly been the player Morey wanted the most.
     
  14. vcchlw

    vcchlw Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2002
    Messages:
    6,828
    Likes Received:
    1,060
    No, but the question is more like

    would you trade Landry+TWO of the following for Kevin Martin:

    1) Jordon Hill
    2) Right to swap 2011 pick (PROTECTED)
    3) PROTECTED 2012 pick

    fyi:
     
  15. Rockets34Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    23,953
    Likes Received:
    22,584
    I just don't think Scola can pick up the slack that Landry put out on the floor night in and night out.
     
  16. JCDenton

    JCDenton Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,098
    Likes Received:
    274

    Either way it doesn't really matter. The imbalance is so huge that giving up one of those assets doesn't matter. Hill wasn't worth much anyway. In two years I promise you that we will consider Kevin Martin a "bad" contract.
     
  17. baller4life315

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    12,716
    Likes Received:
    3,060
    So let me get this straight:

    1) Morey snags a little-known second rounder out of Purdue

    2) That player proceeds to have a monster rookie year -- easily turning into one of the biggest steals in the draft.

    3) That player continues to improve each season yet never establishing himself as a clear-cut starter. All the same, easily building up his value as that player continues to improve each season

    4) Recognizing a chance to 'sell high', Morey flips that little-known second rounder for an All-Star caliber talent and better player in Kevin Martin.

    AND ROUGHLY 25% OF YOU HAVE THE NERVE TO QUESTION HIS ABILITY TO JUDGE TALENT?!
     
    1 person likes this.
  18. gmoney411

    gmoney411 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    3,935
    Likes Received:
    1,039
    I really don't think people appreciate how good of a scorer a healthy kevin martin is. I am just as worried as any other fan about him getting injured but if hes on the court the guy can flat out score. Go compare his career shooting percentages to Ray Allen's and you will see a lot of similarities. Compare his shooting percentages to Tmac's and you will see that they are better across the board. We don't really have to worry all that much about his lack of defense with Ariza or Battier guarding the best two or three on the other team. If Martin can keep himself healthy he is a better fit with Yao than Tmac ever was IMO.
     
  19. Alvin Choo

    Alvin Choo Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2007
    Messages:
    3,466
    Likes Received:
    152
    No matter how I sees it. A 6th man + 2 unused player for a starter + backup PG + 2 fillers is as good as it gets.

    Now with the excess on the wing position, hopefully there will be another trade coming up.
     

Share This Page