1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Democrats set to impose largest tax hike in history, take $2,000/year from you

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by El_Conquistador, Mar 30, 2007.

  1. El_Conquistador

    El_Conquistador King of the D&D, The Legend, #1 Ranking

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2002
    Messages:
    15,648
    Likes Received:
    6,596
    Would you like to cough up $2,000 per year to give to the Democrats? It's amazing that the Democrats are so eager to reverse the tax cuts that by all accounts have proven to be wildly successful in creating jobs, growing the economy, and raising overall tax receipts. With the budget deficit narrowing and an economy firing on all cylinders, this move is wrong for America.

    Back to the Future
    By JOHN BOEHNER
    March 30, 2007; Page A14

    The same folks who larded up the emergency war appropriations bill with billions of dollars in pork-barrel projects are at it again. Yesterday House Democrats voted to impose the largest tax hike in American history. Every spring Congress approves a budget blueprint that lays out its spending priorities and revenue assumptions for the next fiscal year and those that will follow. The budget approved by Democrats on Thursday reverses 12 years of Republican tax cuts and pro-growth policies. It lays the groundwork for increasing personal income tax rates on middle-income families, slashing the child tax credit, reinstating the marriage penalty and bringing back the death tax.

    We've seen this play before. The last time Americans faced a massive tax hike was in 1993 -- the last time Democrats were in the majority. President Clinton campaigned on middle class tax cuts only to turn around and sign what was then the largest tax hike in history. But Clinton's tax hike pales before this one.

    While Democratic friends may view them as just lines on a page, these impending tax hikes are real dollars and cents. Their budget would raise the tax bill for every working American -- 115 million taxpayers will see their taxes go up by an average of $1,795. And if you're married, have children, or own a small business, you're in for extra punishment.

    For example, 48 million married couples will face an average tax increase of $2,899. Seventeen million elderly individuals will pay an average tax increase of $2,270; 26 million small business owners will be hit by an average tax increase $3,960. More than five million individuals and families who would have seen their income tax liabilities completely eliminated will now have to pay taxes. And by failing to reform or eliminate the alternative minimum tax (AMT) that's threatening to engulf more and more Americans, the Democrats' budget imposes an immediate $50 billion tax hike on middle class families.

    That isn't all. By using a budget gimmick known as a "reserve fund," Democrats propose additional spending for federal programs, promising to pay for it later. How? Given their track record, the most likely scenario is that Democrats would burden the middle class with an additional $115 billion in new taxes.

    The president's tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 are a principal reason the economy has enjoyed an uninterrupted string of monthly employment gains. Tax relief under the Republicans has fueled five straight years of overall growth and led to enormous capital investment. By coupling tax hikes with their insatiable appetite for political pork, the Democrats' budget could bring economic growth to an abrupt end.

    Yesterday's budget resolution is not the first assault on taxpayers. On the first day of the 110th Congress, Democrats voted against a Republican proposal to ensure a two-thirds vote is necessary to raise the family tax burden. Once that was accomplished, the Democrats went on to impose more than $6.5 billion in new taxes on American energy producers, which will lead to higher gas prices and higher energy bills for consumers. They tied critical funding for America's troops to billions in pork-spending -- including $25 million for spinach farmers and $75 million for peanut storage. And they hid millions of dollars in earmarks in a giant spending bill.

    While Democrats approved the raid on taxpayers' wallets, House Republicans have suggested Washington tighten its belt. We put forward a bold budget proposal that balances the federal budget within five years without raising taxes. Drafted by Rep. Paul Ryan (R., Wis.), our proposal includes critical protections for Social Security and significant reforms aimed at stemming the coming fiscal tsunami driven by explosive growth in entitlement spending -- something Democrats completely ignore in their budget.

    There is no question that we Republicans could have done a much better job while we were in the majority. But last year we made a concerted effort to recommit to fiscal discipline, approving lean spending bills and implementing important reforms aimed at reducing the number of pork-barrel projects. We clearly have more work to do. But the Democrats' budget takes us two steps backward, and middle class families will be hardest hit.

    To reach our goal of a balanced budget, we need to exercise fiscal restraint, keep taxes low and promote economic growth. We need to reduce earmarks, pass the line-item veto to crack down on worthless pork, and put an end to the excessive waste, fraud and abuse within the federal government. House Republicans have made this effort a top priority.

    There are very real differences on Capitol Hill when it comes to fiscal responsibility. Democrats think we can spend our way out of every problem; Republicans will continue to work to help fiscal sanity triumph over fiscal recklessness.

    Mr. Boehner is the Republican leader in the House of Representatives.

    www.wsj.com
     
  2. weslinder

    weslinder Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    12,983
    Likes Received:
    291
    I can't stand tax increases. The Federal Government is way too big and should be cut. But the Republicans have no leg to stand on in this argument. Had they expended some of their "political capital" to make any significant budget cuts, they'd have an argument against this. We can only hope that the new Democrats, the majority of which are conservatives from the heartland, will stand up to the old guard on this. Most of them promised not to roll back these tax cuts. I hope they can find it within themselves to keep a campaign promise.
     
  3. DonkeyMagic

    DonkeyMagic Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    21,604
    Likes Received:
    3,487
    no surprise there. hopefully smarter minds prevail and maintain the current system.
     
  4. pirc1

    pirc1 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,138
    Likes Received:
    1,882
    48 million Americans sounds like the top 15-20 percent to me.
     
  5. RocketMan Tex

    RocketMan Tex Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    18,452
    Likes Received:
    119
    The "spend our Granchildren's money" system? :rolleyes:
     
  6. mc mark

    mc mark Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    471
    [​IMG]
     
  7. El_Conquistador

    El_Conquistador King of the D&D, The Legend, #1 Ranking

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2002
    Messages:
    15,648
    Likes Received:
    6,596
    Nope, the quote you erroneously referenced is 48 million couples. Make no mistake, as the author pointed out, this tax hike increases taxes for EVERY SINGLE tax payer. That would be the top 100%. Please refrain from posting in this thread from now on.
     
  8. pirc1

    pirc1 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,138
    Likes Received:
    1,882
    Oh I would like to see you try. LOL
     
  9. hotballa

    hotballa Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    12,521
    Likes Received:
    316
    u're kidding me. a REPUBLICAN is talking about how bad tax increases are? Maybe if they weren't the BIGGEST SPENDING congress EVER, there wouldn't need to be an increase.

    And I'm sure you can afford the tax increase Mr. BOEHNER, you can just ask your friend Mr. Abramhoff for more money.
     
  10. Sishir Chang

    Sishir Chang Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2000
    Messages:
    11,064
    Likes Received:
    8
    Where's that King Cheetah "Unlikely" tag when I need it?
     
  11. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,683
    Likes Received:
    16,209
    7 years of amazing economic growth and the first budget surpluses in decades. Yeah, that was awful.
     
  12. vlaurelio

    vlaurelio Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    21,310
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    so how do you want to fund your war? with iraqi oil?

    you b!tch about $2000 only? can't you make up for that using your economics knowledge, or is it just all theory? or maybe thats already 5% of your income right there..
     
  13. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,683
    Likes Received:
    16,209
    Oh, and all Americans benefited from those 7 years of economic growth, unlike the most recent ones where 10% did.
     
  14. GladiatoRowdy

    GladiatoRowdy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    16,596
    Likes Received:
    496
    Of course, Mr. Boner [sic] was using average numbers when he knows as well as we all do that the Dems are going to roll back the GOP tax cuts that went disproportionately to the rich already. So, the AVERAGE American is going to feel very little sting while the rich will go back to paying closer to their fair share.

    That is the way a progressive income tax works. Personally, I would prefer a consumption tax, but I'm not in charge...
     
  15. DonkeyMagic

    DonkeyMagic Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    21,604
    Likes Received:
    3,487
    {teary eyed} think of the children :rolleyes:
     
  16. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,683
    Likes Received:
    16,209
    Do you disagree that having a larger and larger percentage of every tax dollar going to debt interest payments is a bad thing?
     
  17. NewYorker

    NewYorker Ghost of Clutch Fans

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2002
    Messages:
    6,130
    Likes Received:
    41
    Why move taxes now? Especially when the economy is not in the strongest of positions.

    Leave taxes alone, just balance the budget. Man, the democrats weren't elected to raise taxes.
     
  18. deepblue

    deepblue Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2002
    Messages:
    1,648
    Likes Received:
    5
    I don't get it, cut spending sure, but raise taxes?
     
  19. deepblue

    deepblue Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2002
    Messages:
    1,648
    Likes Received:
    5
    What is fair share to you then, 40% of my income goes to taxes, is that not enough?
     
  20. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,683
    Likes Received:
    16,209
    Not possible, unless you want to start cutting everything from school lunches to military to basic social services and veterans funds. You might be able to do it for one year, but not on a consistent basis. Too much of the current funded budget (taxes) goes to social security, medicare, and debt repayment.

    If you want a functional balanced budget, it's going to require a combination of more revenue AND less spending.
     

Share This Page