1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Democrats renew their push to bring back the Military Draft

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Murdock, Oct 8, 2003.

  1. Murdock

    Murdock Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2002
    Messages:
    180
    Likes Received:
    2
    Dems to revive draft demand
    Rep. Rangel and Sen. Hollings see new mood on Iraq
    By Alexander Bolton

    Key Democrats in the House and Senate will renew calls for the military draft as part of a critical barrage they are preparing to launch against President Bush over the length of troop deployments and the heavy reliance on reservists in Iraq.

    Military experts outside Congress say there is a political advantage to be gained by Democrats who want to make the president squirm at a time a growing frustration among military families and other Americans over the occupation.

    But they also say that there are legitimate policy grounds for re-instituting the draft, which was phased out after the Vietnam war.

    Leading Democratic critics of the structure of troop deployment in the Middle East — proponents of a universal military draft — are Rep. Charles Rangel (N.Y.) and Sen. Fritz Hollings (D-S.C.), the top Democrats on the House Ways and Means and Senate Commerce Committees, respectively.

    Rangel has instructed his staff to conduct an in-depth review of the make-up of National Guard and armed services reserve units.

    “My staff is researching now the number of people killed in action and wounded in action and where did they come from,” said Rangel. “It’s a profile of who are the National Guard people and what are their backgrounds and how fragile are their economic backgrounds.

    “Are they people who thought they’d be spending a year in the combat area where they are fish in a barrel and there is no game plan at all?,” he asked rhetorically.

    Such information could serve as a pillar for future Democratic attacks on the administration’s handling of reconstruction efforts, which have become more frequent and intense since Congress authorized the use of force last fall.

    Rangel said many people had joined the National Guard for economic incentives, or to feel patriotic and march in Memorial Day parades, or to respond to floods or other emergencies but not to spend a year in Iraq.

    Rangel said he wants to show the public that Americans being killed and wounded in Iraq are not unknown people or solely professional warriors, but ordinary citizens.
    Hollings declared that if that Rangel renews a push for the draft, “I’ll join him.”

    In January, Rangel and Hollings introduced H.R. 163 in the House and S. 89 in the Senate, respectively. The legislation would re-institute a draft to compulsory military or alternative national service for men and women between the ages of 18 and 26 who are U.S. citizens or residents.

    “I think it’s a combination of political move and more positively a wish to restore the concept of giving back to the community or serving the nation,” said Marcus Corbin, a senior analyst at the Center for Defense Information.

    However, Corbin questioned the timing of renewed discussion of the draft, saying: “I don’t see it as something viable politically. Right now the feeling of not wanting troops in Iraq is as strong as it’s ever been with all the reserve mobilization. There seems to be growing resistance to the operation in Iraq.”

    The issue could be more politically potent now, because in the intervening months since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein’s regime, large numbers of U.S. troops and reservists have been needed in Iraq to quell terrorism and maintain order.

    Adding to difficulties for the administration, foreign allies have refused to contribute a meaningful number of soldiers to share the peacekeeping duties, as U.S. strategists anticipated at the start of the war.

    As a result, tours of duty for American soldiers have been extended beyond expectations and reservists have spent more time in combat conditions then they or their families had anticipated.

    more at the url

    http://www.hillnews.com/news/100703/draft.aspx
     
  2. Cohen

    Cohen Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 1999
    Messages:
    10,751
    Likes Received:
    6
    Wow. The Dems have an openning in 2004, and now are going to trip over themselves again to make certain they lose?

    Nothing like angering a huge block of your own.
     
  3. rimrocker

    rimrocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 1999
    Messages:
    23,123
    Likes Received:
    10,158
    The idea has some merit in the sense that all types of folks would have to serve together. As it is now, Libs and Cons, rich and poor, whites and minorities rarely mix beyond High School (if that). In my estimation, it might bring a more civil discourse to the political process. The problem is in allowing two tracks... if you're going to do this, it should be only one and everybody should go.
     
  4. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    I'm begging you...please run with this as a vital component of your platform. Please. Thanks.
     
  5. rimrocker

    rimrocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 1999
    Messages:
    23,123
    Likes Received:
    10,158
    That's not going to happen. I was merely treating the philosophical. One of the reasons for doing this (even though they know it will not pass) is to make the case that average americans are suffering and sacrificing while those who benefit most from the tax cuts aren't doing their fair share. Not sure I agree with the way they are trying to make the point, but there it is.
     
  6. Kilgore Trout

    Kilgore Trout Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2002
    Messages:
    1,748
    Likes Received:
    142
    Somehow I dont think this will be too popular amoung voters between the age of 18 and 26.
     
  7. bamaslammer

    bamaslammer Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,853
    Likes Received:
    4
    I think it is a bunch of hooey because:

    1. Our force is too high-tech to support a bunch of two-year, untrained conscripts. The professionalism of our military would suffer greatly.

    2. It is simply another silly Democratic ploy that is a waste of time, plain and simple. They are trying to cast Bush as sending off the sons of the poor off to fight some rich man's war for oil, which is the height of stupidity. I knew plenty of folks like myself in the Marines who came from upper middle class backgrounds. I even was offered a football scholarship to college and I passed it up to join the Corps. So their assertion that the military is not representative of our population and is "unfairly" sending the poor off to die is utterly perposterous.
     
  8. GladiatoRowdy

    GladiatoRowdy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    16,596
    Likes Received:
    496
    People between 18 and 26 don't vote for the most part.
     
  9. rimrocker

    rimrocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 1999
    Messages:
    23,123
    Likes Received:
    10,158
    That might be another reason they're proposing it... to get more youngsters voting because they now have a stake in the process.
     
  10. Nomar

    Nomar Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2000
    Messages:
    4,429
    Likes Received:
    2
    To get more youngsters to vote against them?

    For the greater good of getting young people involved?

    Please.
     
  11. Cohen

    Cohen Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 1999
    Messages:
    10,751
    Likes Received:
    6
    Yeah..they will.
     
  12. bamaslammer

    bamaslammer Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,853
    Likes Received:
    4
    If the Dems want to committ suicide amongst the youngsters, be my guest......because they would turn out in droves to vote the authors of that out of power.
     
  13. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,792
    Likes Received:
    41,231
    I am against bringing back the draft. We have a superb volunteer military. What is needed is an increase in it's size, so the call up of reservists and the National Guard will be less frequent, of shorter duration and in smaller numbers. I think we can do this by eliminating Bush's tax cuts and moving a large proportion of that money to increases in benefits, salaries, housing and medical care for veterans... which will have an added benefit of encouraging re-enlistments.

    I didn't serve, but I went through the first draft lottery, an attempt to reform the draft. It was sheer luck that I got a good number. Several of my friends didn't. I have vivid memories of the devisiveness of the draft. We don't want to return to it, unless there is a major land war that requires it. And no, I don't consider Iraq to be that.

    I will vote against any Democratic candidate for the nomination of the party who advocates it.
     
  14. Batman Jones

    Batman Jones Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 1999
    Messages:
    15,937
    Likes Received:
    5,491
    First, no Democratic candidate for president is backing this.

    Second, it has no possibility of becoming a serious issue. It is being pushed by Rangel to make the point that it is significantly easier to send Americans to war when you know your children will be safe from it. Anecdotes of bamaslammer and a few of his friends not withstanding, rich kids, by and large, are not on the front lines. The children of elected officials are, by and large, not on the front lines. Rangel's point: if the sacrifice is so worth it, sacrifice your kids too, not just someone else's. And I agree with him.
     
  15. Batman Jones

    Batman Jones Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 1999
    Messages:
    15,937
    Likes Received:
    5,491
    p.s. 18 to 26 year olds are voting in the next election in force. They're calling themselves Generation Dean.
     
  16. No Worries

    No Worries Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    32,888
    Likes Received:
    20,667
    I would not be surprised if Bush would support the draft. He is probably thinking that we still have wars to fight in Iran, Syria, and North Korea. Rangel might want to be careful; he may get what he wants.
     
  17. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,792
    Likes Received:
    41,231
    I agree, Batman.
    I just wanted to make the point that, as a Democrat, I was strongly against the draft and that there were ways to address what is fast becoming a real problem... our military is too small. There could have been another, more justifiable conflict that could have tied down those forces currently in Iraq. Something needs to be done about it and I think what I suggested is as good a start as any.

    Yes, Rangel is cleverly making his point and it's a good one.
     
  18. Batman Jones

    Batman Jones Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 1999
    Messages:
    15,937
    Likes Received:
    5,491
    I agree with you too, Deckard. Of course, there are a million and one better ways to spend those lost tax revenues than giving them to the people who need them least. But rewarding the rich and screwing the poor is the new honor and integrity. Bush is about as likely to rescind the tax cuts as he is to admit he lied about Iraq. He'd sooner back a draft than do that. Anyway, he knows the rich kids can just use the same draft-dodging loopholes he did.
     
  19. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,792
    Likes Received:
    41,231
    It's still incredible that there is no record of where Bush was for, what... about a year?? There is almost nothing the clown could do that would surprise me now. Rescinding his tax cut plan for the good of the country is probably one of the few things that would.
     
  20. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,080
    Likes Received:
    3,605
    Actually I think that if, as might happen,not enough Guardsmen and Iraq War Vets reenlist, the neocons might have to reinstate the draft in order to have enough troops for their wars. I think it would be wise to let them do this, though I understand the equity issues involved.

    I saw where they are offering a new $5,000 bonus to reenlist. If the Iraq mess continues they might have to raise it.

    One of the problems is that this type of thing attracts single parents who are desperate to support their kids, so they sign up. Of course it is always probematical when the only parent has to go overseas.

    It was saddening to hear about that poor Hispanic woman soldier from Houston who died while trying to earn some tuition money. The Chronicle article mentioned how she had dreams of going to Rice, where, judging from bbs posts, many of our biggest fans of the war went. It makes you think of how unfair it is to just have the poor and the middle class go to fight for the country that the wealthier benefit from so much.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now