Condi Coddles Brutal Dictator from Oil Producing County

here, let me help you out since you forgot the link.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/17/AR2006041701368.html

wouldnt want to be accused of making this stuff up...right?

 

There is a moral reason for all this.
- Hayes

China did it too!
- Sam the Lawyer

 

America dislikes dictatorships*.

*Unless you give us cheap oil (Saudi Arabia, Equatorial Guinea)

America favors democracy*.

*Unless you don't like us and withhold cheap oil (Venezuela)

There might be a connection here, methinks. If nothing else it seems to jive with criticism of US foreign policy, i.e., that

 

America sucks and I can take dumps on it every day, China cannot be criticized ever under any circumstance no matter what

-wnes, Party animal

 

Can Condi's and Teodoro Obiang Nguema's love child be that far away?

 

Rapper Eve is also getting a piece of the action while the people of Equatorial Guinea starve to death:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/gossip/story/392903p-333177c.html

 

China and US does what is needed to keep the economy going. The difference is US is able to get much more oil due to its position as the world's only super power while China needs to get it anyway it can. China doesn't constantly get on the high horse and criticize other nations which the US does all the time. Not saying that China is right or US is wrong, but US is definitely hypocritical when it come to foreign polices.

 

I agree with this statement for the most part. I'm talking about wnes' high horse, which resides in his glass mansion, where he keeps his catapults and slingshots.

 

Look sam, I support China no matter which political party runs it, as long as it safeguards state sovereignty, unity, territorial integrity and security. The "CCP lover" label doesn't stick on me.

As I have said previously, there are plenty of things in China that are going wrong and deserve harsh criticism. However, this is not a China forum. The majority of the participants are Americans, and they 1) have limited exposure to China, 2) are generally more or less indifferent to things that don't affect them directly.

 

Well, last time I checked, it's not "All American D&D", so I don't adhere to your content restrictions in the name of state security, LOL, just like I don't expect you to do the same.

 

I certainly don't object to, nor do I have control over discussions on China's national security. You can be sure guys like tigermission1 will bring up topic like this from time to time. For the most part, you have to admit the majority participants here have little interest in strictly China's internal problems. At the end of the day, China-related discussions would inevitably turn into fights between a few Chinese posters and anti-China nuts like you.

 

And this degeneration happens precisely because you and others characterize all opposition as "anti-China nuts".

This is exactly the same tactic that Trader_Jorge and bigtexxx employ whenever anybody criticizes the Bush Administration - characterize the critics as "America-hating whiny libpigs".

You dont' like it when they do it. Why should you be allowed to do the same?

 

that's funny, didn't the african like eve on the first barbershop movie?

 

LOL sammy, don't you see the irony in your "should be allowed" phrase?

 

Oh, for f-k's sake - the usual wnes paranoia sets in.

But anyway, I'll ALLOW you this accomodation and rephrase:

And this degeneration happens precisely because you and others characterize all opposition as "anti-China nuts".

This is exactly the same tactic that Trader_Jorge and bigtexxx employ whenever anybody criticizes the Bush Administration - characterize the critics as "America-hating whiny libpigs".

You dont' like it when they do it. Why should you be allowed to do the same and then lament the resulting lack of serious discussion? You and bigtexxx are two of a kind.

When it comes to criticizing governments, wnes, you're a hypocrite. Plain and simple.

 

I think we should have a consortium of brutal dictators that can provide us oil and other resources on the cheap. The keynote speakers should be Kim Jong Il and Robert Mugabe.

 

wnes, you might take a page from George W. Bush, of all people, in his news conference with your President. He said (and this is paraphrased), "China and the United States have substantial differences. As long as we discuss them with friendship and goodwill, we will make progress." That is something you almost never do. Whenever someone makes a comment critical of practically any policy of China, you react with personal attacks, and quite heated ones. Of course, that frequently leads to a response similar to yours. You make no effort to discuss the, "substantial differences," with, "friendship and goodwill." Instead, you do things like accusing Sam of (to paraphrase) being a spy, attempting to stir up trouble in China by supporting "terrorists" and what you sarcastically refer to as "freedom fighters," of visiting China in an attempt to do so, of having an agenda that is "anti-Chinese." And so on.

Before you reply with a Hayseian attempt to dissect my post, I wish you'd think about this, at least for a minute or two. It's what you do, whether the poster is Sam, me, or someone else, and in any forum. Don't misunderstand me... sometimes you have good reason to be critical, when someone else clearly is, but your response is never in a spirit of, "friendship and goodwill." It is always an assault on the member making the post, no matter what that criticism is, or how minor the criticism amounts to.

In my opinion.



Keep D&D Civil.