1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

CIA analysis finds no Iranian nuclear weapons drive

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by nappdog, Nov 19, 2006.

  1. nappdog

    nappdog Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2002
    Messages:
    1,360
    Likes Received:
    6
    http://www.afp.com/english/news/stories/061119034024.d010tlyg.html

    WASHINGTON (AFP) - A classifed draft CIA assessment has found no firm evidence of a secret drive by Iran to develop nuclear weapons, as alleged by the White House, a top US investigative reporter has said.

    Seymour Hersh, writing in an article for the November 27 issue of the magazine The New Yorker released in advance, reported on whether the administration of Republican President George W. Bush was more, or less, inclined to attack Iran after Democrats won control of Congress last week.

    A month before the November 7 legislative elections, Hersh wrote, Vice President Dick Cheney attended a national-security discussion that touched on the impact of Democratic victory in both chambers on Iran policy.

    "If the Democrats won on November 7th, the vice president said, that victory would not stop the administration from pursuing a military option with Iran," Hersh wrote, citing a source familiar with the discussion.

    Cheney said the White House would circumvent any legislative restrictions "and thus stop Congress from getting in its way," he said.

    The Democratic victory unleashed a surge of calls for the Bush administration to begin direct talks with Iran.

    But the administration's planning of a military option was made "far more complicated" in recent months by a highly classified draft assessment by the Central Intelligence Agency "challenging the White House's assumptions about how close Iran might be to building a nuclear bomb," he wrote.

    "The CIA found no conclusive evidence, as yet, of a secret Iranian nuclear-weapons program running paallel to the civilian operations that Iran has declared to the International Atomic Energy Agency," Hersh wrote, adding the CIA had declined to comment on that story.

    A current senior intelligence official confirmed the existence of the CIA analysis and said the White House had been hostile to it, he wrote.

    Cheney and his aides had discounted the assessment, the official said.

    "They're not looking for a smoking gun," the official was quoted as saying, referring to specific intelligence about Iranian nuclear planning.

    "They're looking for the degree of comfort level they think they need to accomplish the mission."

    The United States and other major powers believe Iran's uranium enrichment program is ultimately aimed at producing fissile material for nuclear weapons.

    Iran insists it will use the enriched uranium only to fuel nuclear power stations, something it is permitted to do as a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

    The major powers have been debating a draft United Nations resolution drawn up by Britain, France and Germany that would impose limited sanctions on Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile sectors for Tehran's failure to comply with an earlier UN resolution on halting enrichment.

    On Wednesday, Israel's outgoing US ambassador Danny Ayalon said in an interview that Bush would not hesitate to use force against Iran to halt its nuclear program if other options failed.

    "US President George W. Bush will not hesitate to use force against Iran in order to halt its nuclear program," Ayalon told the Maariv daily.

    Israel, widely considered the Middle East's sole if undeclared nuclear power, views Iran as its arch-foe, pointing to repeated calls by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to wipe the Jewish state off the map.
     
  2. lpbman

    lpbman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2001
    Messages:
    4,240
    Likes Received:
    816
    I'd wager they don't need much in the way of nuclear weapons development. Pakistan and North Korea have done the leg work for them.

    Anyway, the U.N. deadline for Iran to stop nuclear processing passed a month ago.... We are content to allow Iran to mess with Iraqi internal politics, send weapons and supplies that are killing our soldiers and process nuclear material.
     
  3. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    46,853
    Likes Received:
    12,438
    Whether they are developing nuclear weapons or not, a military strike on Iran by the U.S. would be a catastrophic mistake. Worse than the Iraq disaster.
     
  4. rimrocker

    rimrocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 1999
    Messages:
    23,149
    Likes Received:
    10,242
    Stupid CIA. I bet they didn't even look in Syria.
     
  5. insane man

    insane man Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,892
    Likes Received:
    5
    why do you think countries that have spent decades and billions of dollars would so easily hand over nukes?

    plus since you probably dont know the nuances of geopolitics i'll let you in on a secret. iran and pakistan dont have a lovely relationship since they both have competing interests in afghanistan. do you really think pakistan would share nukes?

    c'mon.
     
  6. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    46,853
    Likes Received:
    12,438
    Isn't it common knowledge that Dr. Khan shared Pakistan's nuclear technology with North Korea and Iran?
     
  7. lpbman

    lpbman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2001
    Messages:
    4,240
    Likes Received:
    816
    Money... lots and lots of money. What do you do with a device you spent billions and billions of dollars on and then can't use. You sell it like a rusted Yugo ...

    Iran and Pakistan may have competing interests in Afghanistan, but they have the common interest in getting the U.S. out of their hair.
     
  8. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,684
    Likes Received:
    16,210
    No country wants a neighbor, ally or not, to have nuclear weapons. It's part of the reason China doesn't want North Korea to have them. You never know when your friend will become your enemy - especially in that part of the world - or when instability in a neighboring country will suck in your own.

    North Korea might sell them technology, but it's unlikely that Pakistan and Iran will share too much. Some basics, certainly - but not the core of it.
     
  9. Highwire

    Highwire Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Messages:
    563
    Likes Received:
    0
    They're not developing now cuz it's long been developed.
     
  10. canoner2002

    canoner2002 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2002
    Messages:
    4,069
    Likes Received:
    1
    Doesn't matter if they are doing it or not, or have done it, or will never do it, military action against Iran is a HUGE mistake, and there is no legal ground for it at all.
     
  11. insane man

    insane man Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,892
    Likes Received:
    5
    well firstly the whole dr khan thing is a farce. the pakistan government probably shared some basic stuff. not just dr khan but dr khan is a nice scapegoat which allows musharaf to pretend like he didn't know anything about it.

    but there is no way in hell pakistan would share with iran real nuclear secrets today. and its not just pakistan-iran animosity but also there is a fairly close relationship between pakistan and the gulf nations especially saudi arabia. pakistan gets tremendous aid as well as discounted oil. how do you think iran getting nukes via pakistan's help would go over in the gulf?
     
  12. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    46,853
    Likes Received:
    12,438
    If the Dr. Khan thing is a "farce" as you say, then I agree Pakistan would not give nuclear info to Iran for obvious reasons. NONE of the Gulf or I.S.C. nations want Iran to go nuclear. I guess you know more about the situation than me because I don't consider Dr. Khan a scapegoat.
     

Share This Page