1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Chinese General: We should use nukes if US defends Taiwan

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by basso, Jul 15, 2005.

  1. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,363
    Likes Received:
    9,291
    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/15/international/asia/15china.html?

    --
    Chinese General Threatens Use of A-Bombs if U.S. Intrudes
    By JOSEPH KAHN

    BEIJING, Friday, July 15 - China should use nuclear weapons against the United States if the American military intervenes in any conflict over Taiwan, a senior Chinese military official said Thursday.

    "If the Americans draw their missiles and position-guided ammunition on to the target zone on China's territory, I think we will have to respond with nuclear weapons," the official, Maj. Gen. Zhu Chenghu, said at an official briefing.

    General Zhu, considered a hawk, stressed that his comments reflected his personal views and not official policy. Beijing has long insisted that it will not initiate the use of nuclear weapons in any conflict.

    But in extensive comments to a visiting delegation of correspondents based in Hong Kong, General Zhu said he believed that the Chinese government was under internal pressure to change its "no first use" policy and to make clear that it would employ the most powerful weapons at its disposal to defend its claim over Taiwan.

    "War logic" dictates that a weaker power needs to use maximum efforts to defeat a stronger rival, he said, speaking in fluent English. "We have no capability to fight a conventional war against the United States," General Zhu said. "We can't win this kind of war."

    Whether or not the comments signal a shift in Chinese policy, they come at a sensitive time in relations between China and the United States.

    The Pentagon is preparing the release of a long-delayed report on the Chinese military that some experts say will warn that China could emerge as a strategic rival to the United States. National security concerns have also been a major issue in the $18.5 billion bid by Cnooc Ltd., a major Chinese oil and gas company, to purchase the Unocal Corporation, the American energy concern.

    China has had atomic bombs since 1964 and currently has a small arsenal of land- and sea-based nuclear-tipped missiles that can reach the United States, according to most Western intelligence estimates. Some Pentagon officials have argued that China has been expanding the size and sophistication of its nuclear bombs and delivery systems, while others argue that Beijing has done little more than maintain a minimal but credible deterrent against a nuclear attack.

    Beijing has said repeatedly that it would use military force to prevent Taiwan from becoming a formally independent country. President Bush has made clear that the United States would defend Taiwan.

    Many military analysts have assumed that any battle over Taiwan would be localized, with both China and the United States taking care to ensure that it would not expand into a general war between the two powers.

    But the comments by General Zhu suggest that at least some elements of the military are prepared to widen the conflict, perhaps to persuade the United States that it could no more successfully fight a limited war against China than it could against the former Soviet Union.

    "If the Americans are determined to interfere, then we will be determined to respond," he said. "We Chinese will prepare ourselves for the destruction of all the cities east of Xian. Of course the Americans will have to be prepared that hundreds of cities will be destroyed by the Chinese."

    General Zhu's threat is not the first of its kind from a senior Chinese military official. In 1995, Xiong Guangkai, who is now the deputy chief of the general staff of the People's Liberation Army, told Chas W. Freeman, a former Pentagon official, that China would consider using nuclear weapons in a Taiwan conflict. Mr. Freeman quoted Mr. Xiong as saying that Americans should worry more about Los Angeles than Taipei.

    Foreign Ministry officials did not immediately respond to requests for comment about General Zhu's remarks.

    General Zhu said he had recently expressed his views to former American officials, including Mr. Freeman and Adm. Dennis C. Blair, the former commander in chief of the United States Pacific Command.

    David Lague of The International Herald Tribune contributed reporting for this article.
     
  2. RocketMan Tex

    RocketMan Tex Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    18,452
    Likes Received:
    119
    I read somewhere that after the Gulf War ended, a general from India stated that "the lesson of this war is that if you are going to war with the United States, you'd better have a nuclear weapon".
     
  3. wnes

    wnes Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    8,196
    Likes Received:
    19
    Methinks if this thread is merged with the 2 Plame/Rove threads, there's no way the MacBeth come-back thread can beat it.
     
  4. Surfguy

    Surfguy Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 1999
    Messages:
    24,560
    Likes Received:
    12,837
    Is that guy an idiot or what? If they start a nuclear war with us, then both countries are going to be devastated by nuclear weapons. There won't be anyone left to give a rat's ass about Taiwan...which I don't give a rat's ass about anyway. And, the rest of the world will be choking on nuclear fallout.

    It's a stupid ass scenario and, if the the governments of these two countries did choose this outcome, then they don't deserve to be around nor do the people they serve if the governments they choose resort to such extremes.

    So, damn it all to hell if that happens.
     
  5. pirc1

    pirc1 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,137
    Likes Received:
    1,882
    Lock down in 3 2 1! Isn't this the same thread just a few spots down?? :rolleyes:
     
  6. HayesStreet

    HayesStreet Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 1999
    Messages:
    8,507
    Likes Received:
    181
    Sounds like a good rationale for BMD Defense to me....
     
  7. code9x

    code9x Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2004
    Messages:
    193
    Likes Received:
    0
    the general said if the U.S. attacks/bombs mainland Chinese territory first.....
     
  8. HayesStreet

    HayesStreet Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 1999
    Messages:
    8,507
    Likes Received:
    181
    Where did you see 'mainland' in the article? I didn't see that.
     
  9. code9x

    code9x Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2004
    Messages:
    193
    Likes Received:
    0
    it's assumed since the u.s. ain't going to bomb taiwan(even though legally and historically is chinese territory).
     
  10. HayesStreet

    HayesStreet Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 1999
    Messages:
    8,507
    Likes Received:
    181
    "China should use nuclear weapons against the United States if the American military intervenes in any conflict over Taiwan..."

    That doesn't seem to indicate bombing the mainland to me. In fact, if we were to wipe out the PLA's growing naval force, I'm not sure this guy would draw the distinction you do.


    Saw an interesting read on what would happen in another forum. Personally I don't the PLA would EVER launch nukes on the US - the are much more concerned with modernization and the continued economic development of the country. Occasionally the saber rattle to keep up a good face. Anyway, this is what one guy had to say, and I think it would happen this way in the worst case:

    If China ever attacks Taiwan, I predict:-
    The PRC air force lasts about 8 hours.
    PRC navy will be sunk within 3 hours.
    PLA will suffer massive casualties within hours.
    PRC will threaten nuke attacks on US cities.
    USA publicizes these threats and then launches non nuke attacks on PRC
    nuke storage areas.
    PRC attempts to launch a nuke attack but fails.
    US launches massive nuke strike on PRC leadership. Riots break out all over PRC against the PRC government. PRC government falls within two weeks after the beginning of the crisis.
     
  11. nappdog

    nappdog Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2002
    Messages:
    1,360
    Likes Received:
    6

    Wow :eek: , this would break the record for the the quickest ass whooping ever;which was previously held by our only ally in the middle east (6-day war).
     
  12. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,785
    Likes Received:
    41,212
    Sure 'nuff, bro.



    Keep D&D Civil!!
     
  13. code9x

    code9x Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2004
    Messages:
    193
    Likes Received:
    0
    with the rate of military modernization they have.....i don't think so....
    by 2010, they will have about 30-40 modern and very capable submarines(Yuan, Russian Kilos, Song, advanced nuclear submarines 093 and 094), a bunch(probably 500)) of longer range Tomahawk style cruise missiles, probably about 400+ advanced fighters(Su-27, Su-30MKK, MKK2, J-10, FC-1) with advanced beyond visual range air to air missile backed by airborne radars, new advanced surface ships with considerable advanced technology and firepower, and other feats such as way better military training and command structure. there are more than i can list. they are modeling their military like the U.S...they learned that lesson after witnessing america go bananas on Iraq in 91....

    they even have stealth fighter program and it is reportedly going under testing i believe, inferior to the F-22 Raptor but might be equal to the Eurofighter and the Rafale, they probably have the engines ready by now, and the new radars aren't that far off. every thing you can think of....they made considerable progress in a short amount of time....from advanced airplanes engines, electronics, radars, missiles, etc.....with the urgency to try to take back Taiwan, more money to spend on the military, and infusion of foreign technolgies and serious research and development.....the PRC military transformation is the by far the most recent spectacular military buildup(in quality and quantity) in recent decade. Ask the Russian military officials are companies that make aircrafts, submarines, missiles, and ships and they will tell you that they are shocked/surprised at their progress.
     
  14. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    45,954
    Likes Received:
    28,048
    China has been accumulating Dr. Evil-esque ransom money from the US.

    Mainland surplus may top US$100,000,000,000

    The Chinese mainland's trade surplus for 2005 could climb to a record high of US$100 billion. This could trigger more intensified trade rows with its major trading partners, said an economist.

    ... The investment bank also estimated that the mainland's mounting foreign reserves would surpass US$1 trillion from the current US$659 billion by 2008 as a result of robust export growth.


    Overheated economy? fuggetaboutit
     
  15. Sishir Chang

    Sishir Chang Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2000
    Messages:
    11,064
    Likes Received:
    8
    "If the Americans draw their missiles and position-guided ammunition on to the target zone on China's territory, I think we will have to respond with nuclear weapons," the official, Maj. Gen. Zhu Chenghu, said at an official briefing."

    I would agree that the PRC isn't strong enough to take Taiwan militarily, short of using nukes on Taiwan, but I think that's an overly optimistic picture. While the US and Taiwanese airforce is technologically superior the PRC airforce is huge and its pilots aren't total slouches either. The PLA is also massive and can sustain far larger casualties numbers and continue functioning than any other country. Nuke facilities and command and control are hidden in well hardened facilities and couldn't be taken out that easily. Finally while the Chinese people are often fractious there is a great spirit of nationalism and if the US were to launch nuke strikes on the Chinese its not a sure bet that riots would break out and the PRC would fall. Its just as likely that there will be a greater rallying guarenteeing hostility from surviving Chinese in China and the worldwide Chinese diaspora that would make the threat from Al Qaeda pale. The Japanese WWII predicted that they would conquer all of China in three months since China then was governed by a far less stable nationalist government wracked by civil war and corruption. A unified prosperous China under the CCP isn't going to fall easily even if Beijing and Shanghai are nuked.

    That said I think this is just some more sabre rattling and thinking out loud from the Chinese general. Its true that the PRC can't defeat the US conventionally but neither could they win a nuclear war. At the most they could hope for is that there are more Chinese left standing than Americans. A nuke exchange would be devestating for both and for the rest of the world and I can't believe that any Chinese general could sanely be considering that against the US as a reasonable option.
     
  16. qrui

    qrui Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2002
    Messages:
    1,528
    Likes Received:
    1
    did you check the dates before you quoted? that got to be written some 30 years ago, at least 25. :D wake up!
     
  17. code9x

    code9x Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2004
    Messages:
    193
    Likes Received:
    0
    he's just saying his own opinion.


    i don't know about that in the near future....right now....maybe. some of their fighters now are equivalent to u.s. fighters with the exception of the newer ones like the F-22 raptor. and they have deadly missiles too. They have considerable numbers(300+) of Su-27, J-11(homemade Su-27) Su-30MKK, SU-30MKK2, advanced fighters that will really irritate the U.S. Their new domestic fighter J-10 in mass production ain't no slouch too and is probably equal to the latest F-16 Falcons. The numbers of these fighers are going to skyrocket. And to add to these list, the older J-8s some of them may even be equipped with their new SD-10 missile, which is in the same class as the american AMRAAM, which is america's most advanced air to air fighter missile in service.

    and their stealth fighter program is coming along pretty well i heard, even though it might be inferior to the raptor it might be really good.
     
  18. KaiSeR SoZe

    KaiSeR SoZe Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2003
    Messages:
    8,395
    Likes Received:
    39
    they don't have Jack Bauer
     
  19. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,363
    Likes Received:
    9,291
    Max may overreach a bit here, but there are some disturbing parallels in current events...

    http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-boot20jul20,0,89656.column?coll=la-home-headlines

    --
    China's stealth war on the U.S.
    by Max Boot
    Maj. Gen. Zhu Chenghu of the Chinese People's Liberation Army caused quite a stir last week when he threatened to nuke "hundreds" of American cities if the U.S. dared to interfere with a Chinese attempt to conquer Taiwan.

    This saber-rattling comes while China is building a lot of sabers. Although its defense budget, estimated to be as much as $90 billion, remains a fraction of the United States', it is enough to make China the world's third-biggest weapons buyer (behind Russia) and the biggest in Asia. Moreover, China's spending has been increasing rapidly, and it is investing in the kind of systems — especially missiles and submarines — needed to challenge U.S. naval power in the Pacific.

    The Pentagon on Tuesday released a study of Chinese military capabilities. In a preview, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told a Singapore audience last month that China's arms buildup was an "area of concern." It should be. But we shouldn't get overly fixated on such traditional indices of military power as ships and bombs — not even atomic bombs. Chinese strategists, in the best tradition of Sun Tzu, are working on craftier schemes to topple the American hegemon.

    In 1998, an official People's Liberation Army publishing house brought out a treatise called "Unrestricted Warfare," written by two senior army colonels, Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui. This book, which is available in English translation, is well known to the U.S. national security establishment but remains practically unheard of among the general public.

    "Unrestricted Warfare" recognizes that it is practically impossible to challenge the U.S. on its own terms. No one else can afford to build mega-expensive weapons systems like the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, which will cost more than $200 billion to develop. "The way to extricate oneself from this predicament," the authors write, "is to develop a different approach."

    Their different approaches include financial warfare (subverting banking systems and stock markets), drug warfare (attacking the fabric of society by flooding it with illicit drugs), psychological and media warfare (manipulating perceptions to break down enemy will), international law warfare (blocking enemy actions using multinational organizations), resource warfare (seizing control of vital natural resources), even ecological warfare (creating man-made earthquakes or other natural disasters).

    Cols. Qiao and Wang write approvingly of Al Qaeda, Colombian drug lords and computer hackers who operate outside the "bandwidths understood by the American military." They envision a scenario in which a "network attack against the enemy" — clearly a red, white and blue enemy — would be carried out "so that the civilian electricity network, traffic dispatching network, financial transaction network, telephone communications network and mass media network are completely paralyzed," leading to "social panic, street riots and a political crisis." Only then would conventional military force be deployed "until the enemy is forced to sign a dishonorable peace treaty."

    This isn't just loose talk. There are signs of this strategy being implemented. The anti-Japanese riots that swept China in April? That would be psychological warfare against a major Asian rival. The stage-managed protests in 1999, after the U.S. accidentally bombed the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade, fall into the same category.

    The bid by the state-owned China National Offshore Oil Co., to acquire Unocal? Resource warfare. Attempts by China's spy apparatus to infiltrate U.S. high-tech firms and defense contractors? Technological warfare. China siding against the U.S. in the U.N. Security Council over the invasion of Iraq? International law warfare. Gen. Zhu's threat to nuke the U.S.? Media warfare.

    And so on. Once you know what to look for, the pieces fall into place with disturbing ease. Of course, most of these events have alternative, more benign explanations: Maybe Gen. Zhu is an eccentric old coot who's seen "Dr. Strangelove" a few too many times.

    The deliberate ambiguity makes it hard to craft a response to "unrestricted warfare." If Beijing sticks to building nuclear weapons, we know how to deal with that — use the deterrence doctrine that worked against the Soviets. But how do we respond to what may or may not be indirect aggression by a major trading partner? Battling terrorist groups like Al Qaeda seems like a cinch by comparison.

    This is not a challenge the Pentagon is set up to address, but it's an urgent issue for the years ahead.
     
  20. code9x

    code9x Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2004
    Messages:
    193
    Likes Received:
    0
    even though china is improving economically, politically, and militarily significantly...i think this anti-china thing is getting out of hand and a bit ridiculous and paranoid....i bet ordinary chinese think this paranoia and communism, china threatens the world trashtalking from america is getting really pathetic. yeah china is still communist politically, economically it is essentially capitalist. the corruption and human rights thing, it is not perfect but getting better each day.

    the last time i heard some Chinese company wants to buy UNOCAL, so what? most of UNOCAL oil assets is in Asia.... just let them buy it....we owe them hundreds of billions of dollars. and dude, what threat is there buying an oil company??!!
    what are they going to do? steal some top secret oil drilling techniques? :rolleyes:

    The U.S. spends more money on its military than the next 10 combined militaries in the world and definitely way more than China and has bases all over the world and recently conquered Iraq and has an excellent record of bombing other countries....so it is a bit pathetic and lame for the Bush administration to criticize chinese military modernization.
     

Share This Page