1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

China Violating UN Embargo, Providing Arms & Training to Sudan Army

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by SamFisher, Jul 13, 2008.

  1. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,825
    Likes Received:
    41,299
    sorry Darfur, get a little taste of non-intervention, china style:

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/chinasudandarfurmilitarytradeunembargobritain


    LONDON (AFP) - China is breaking the United Nations arms embargo on Sudan, providing military equipment and training pilots to fly Chinese jets, the BBC said Sunday, citing an investigation by its journalists.

    Citing two confidential sources, the broadcaster said China was training pilots to fly Chinese Fantan fighter jets, and that Sudan had imported several fighter trainers called K8s two years ago.

    It obtained satellite photographs of the planes, reportedly believed to have been delivered to Sudan in 2003 -- the UN arms embargo was imposed in March 2005 -- at an airport in Nyala in south Darfur last month.

    The BBC said it had established, without citing its sources, that the jets were flying out of Nyala on missions in February.

    The broadcaster said that China had declined to comment on the report, which will be broadcast Monday evening.

    A UN panel of experts had asked to examine the evidence compiled by the documentary team, the BBC added.

    The investigators said they had also found one Dong Feng Chinese army lorry in the hands of a rebel group in Darfur.

    It cited independent eyewitness testimony saying the lorry had been captured from Sudanese government forces in December.

    A second lorry was filmed by rebels using a BBC camera. Both vehicles were carrying anti-aircraft guns, one of which was Chinese, said the broadcaster.

    Serial numbers on both lorries showed they were part of a batch of 212 Dong Feng lorries traced by the UN as having been sent to Sudan after the 2005 arms embargo was imposed.

    The anti-aircraft guns had been installed after they arrived in Sudan.

    According to the BBC, quoting witnesses, the anti-aircraft guns were fired into civilian houses in the town of Sirba in west Darfur in December.

    Monday's BBC report will come the same day that the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court in The Hague is expected to name the President Omar al-Beshir of Sudan a war crimes suspect.

    The Darfur conflict began in 2003 when ethnic minority rebels took up arms against the Arab-dominated regime and state-backed militias, fighting for resources and power in one of the most remote and deprived places on earth.

    The UN has said that 300,000 people have died in Darfur and more than 2.2 million have been displaced since 2003 -- the Sudanese government puts the number of fatalities at 10,000.

    China, the main buyer of Sudan's oil and a key investor in the economy, has repeatedly been accused of not doing enough to make Khartoum stop the brutal campaign.
     
  2. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,988
    Likes Received:
    39,455
    LOL - arms embargos are a joke...

    DD
     
  3. rz04

    rz04 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not saying if its right or wrong for countries to export weapons to conflicted nations but are my the only one who is confused by this?

    If the embargo was imposed in 2005, and the planes shipped in 2003 was it illegal?
     
  4. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,167
    Likes Received:
    48,334
    That seems a little confusing but they further mention:
    [rquoter]Citing two confidential sources, the broadcaster said China was training pilots to fly Chinese Fantan fighter jets, and that Sudan had imported several fighter trainers called K8s two years ago.
    [/rquoter]

    It sounds like even though the planes might've been shipped in 2003 the PRC has been training and arming the pilots after 2005.
     
  5. wnes

    wnes Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    8,196
    Likes Received:
    19
    Maybe China was simply offering courses to the Sudanese on "managing defence in a centralized and collective training" like the Brits did in a similar fashion in the same period?

    If BBC doesn't stand for British BullCrap, I don't know what it is.
     
  6. MFW

    MFW Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,112
    Likes Received:
    24
    Part of a weapons export deal is the training of users and service of the said weapons systems for a certain period of time. Therefore, China has a contractual obligation to fulfill to the Sudanese government. It is hence hardly surprising that they are training the Sudanese.

    One might argue whether an UN arms embargo nullifies this contractual obligation, but taken directly, China is not violating the embargo, even if assuming these un-cited "sources" are correct.
     
  7. MFW

    MFW Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,112
    Likes Received:
    24
    Of course, in typical BBC bullsh1ting fashion, they tried to spin Dong Feng export as in violation of the arms embargo. Here is a picture of the ancient model of crap Dong Feng lorry Sudan likely to have ordered:

    [​IMG]

    Of course BBC tried to spin that as a weapons system, even though itself stated:

     
  8. Ottomaton

    Ottomaton Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2000
    Messages:
    19,193
    Likes Received:
    15,351
    I'm sure that you don't really care, and just want another chance to feel like the west is out to get your poor beloved innocent China, but the USA and European countries embargo the sale of American or European trucks and truck parts of the same type as military goods.

    Heavy transport trucks the world over were considered military goods before it reflected unfavorably on China, and they will continue to be military goods long after. But go ahead b**** and moan about how unfairly China is treated. I expect nothing less but an all out frontal assault in retaliation by the worker drones whenever Sam Fisher kicks the Chinese fire ant nest.
     
  9. MFW

    MFW Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,112
    Likes Received:
    24
    By far the predominant use of trucks ANYWHERE in the world is civilian. If you want to classify them as military, this is your own goddam problem.

    Dragging China into a non-starter "issue" is nothing more than another repeated attempt by a couple of card carrying anti-China/anti-Chinese morons including not only Sammy Fisher, but also yourself, into the latest attempt to beanbag China.

    Do yourself a favour and actually go google what a Dong Feng military truck looks like.

    But all that aside, you know what else is a weapon? A fork. That's down right dangerous. Omar al-Bashir could be, ahem... encouraging the Janjaweed to stab rebels with them. China has exported forks to Sudan. Knives too.

    My god, they are violating the arms embargo more than you and I thought.
     
  10. Ottomaton

    Ottomaton Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2000
    Messages:
    19,193
    Likes Received:
    15,351
    Exactly what I expected, thanks.
     
  11. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,825
    Likes Received:
    41,299
    Before we get into some ridiculous argument about how the trucks were just for carrying stuffed animals to army orphans - let's just be clear that China's policy of "nonintervention" is a farce. (actually i don't know if it's even a chinese policy - rather it's the post-hoc designation of english -speaking Netizens out to defend China's internet pride from slights, real and imagined.)

    China likes anybody who gives it access to commodities and raw materials, and they're more than willing to overlook any issues and give implicit and explicit political, financial, and military support to regimes or groups that can provide this access. non-intervention is switzerland. China is not this. End of fallacy.

    EDIT: The breach of contract excuse made my evening. Thx.
     
  12. MFW

    MFW Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,112
    Likes Received:
    24
    And your response is exactly what I expected too. Absolutely no counter-argument. Hardly surprising.

    That's just hilarious Sammy. Perhaps you'd care to define "nonintervention."

    The Chinese government's policy is separating trade from politics. So far they've done a better job at it than anybody.

    China and the US don't always see eye to eye, didn't affect trade except when it is a trade related issue. Relationships with Japan has often been frosty, but trade is booming. Taiwan is threatened with use of force if it declares independence, the mainland is Taiwan's biggest trade partner and Taiwanese business people get favourable policies. And that is pretty much true in their dealings with everybody in the business world China has an interest trading with.

    But nooooooo, you just want to focus on the likes of Sudan, Zimbabwe, Iran, Myanmar don't ya?

    And those trucks? China sold them a bunch of trucks, which do not violate the arms embargo. What Sudan does with them is unfortunately nobody's business.
     
  13. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,825
    Likes Received:
    41,299
  14. KingCheetah

    KingCheetah Atomic Playboy
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Messages:
    59,079
    Likes Received:
    52,748
    I can't believe China is selling Sudan Dongfeng Lorries -- that is shameful.


    END THE GENOCIDE
     
  15. MFW

    MFW Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,112
    Likes Received:
    24
    What is it that they said about unproven allegations again? Oh yeah, worthless.

    And most of Sudan's oils going to China is hardly a surprise either. The west is after all, trying to put sanctions on the country.

    I agree. The senseless genocide of your brain cells has been done ever since you were born. Their population is decreasing at an alarming rate.

    It has to stop. Stop the genocide!
     
  16. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,825
    Likes Received:
    41,299
  17. MFW

    MFW Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,112
    Likes Received:
    24
    Clap clap Sammy, you've sunk to a new low. And here I thought it was impossible.

    Nobody has your moronic ass gone totally off topic... again, you've started using biased trash op ed pieces as your proof.

    Want to venture to guess the number of Chinese people in Zambia? Not only is it ignorable, the majority of those there are also short term. Got a construction project there? When it's done they pack their bags and go home.
     
  18. KingCheetah

    KingCheetah Atomic Playboy
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Messages:
    59,079
    Likes Received:
    52,748
    [​IMG]

    DANGER

    DANGER


    DANGER
     
  19. MFW

    MFW Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,112
    Likes Received:
    24
    KingCheetah and his moronic picture posting struck again.

    What better way to hide your embarrassing lack of argument than posting a silly little picture.
     
  20. Kwame

    Kwame Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2007
    Messages:
    5,756
    Likes Received:
    333
    Those Darfur rebels shouldn't have violated a ceasefire and should've accepted the peace deals brokered by the international community and offered to them by Khartoum. The Christians in the south did and there are no more real probelms there.
     

Share This Page