1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Canada (Now, "Canuckistan") Refuses to Be in Missile Defense Scheme

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by glynch, Feb 25, 2005.

  1. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,082
    Likes Received:
    3,605
    This is another example of the inreased lack of cooperation of traditional allies with Bush's America.

    The Canuckistanis even had the temerity to vote for a union at a Walmart strore in Quebec. Walmart has announced it will close the store in probable violation of Canada labor laws.

    Maybe we can boycott Canadian something. Can anyone think of something we import from Canuckistan? Remember when the conservos boycotted the hated "French" fries?

    The Canadians might not love us, but at least they fear us.
    ***********
    The formal announcement Thursday that Canada will refuse any further participation in the controversial U.S. missile-defence shield was met with an immediate warning that Canada had given up its sovereignty.

    Although Prime Minister Paul Martin said Canada would “insist” on maintaining control of its airspace, U.S. ambassador Paul Cellucci warned that Washington would not be constrained.

    “We will deploy. We will defend North America,” he said.

    “We simply cannot understand why Canada would in effect give up its sovereignty – its seat at the table – to decide what to do about a missile that might be coming towards Canada.”

    Foreign Affairs Minister Pierre Pettigrew made the Canadian decision public after months of equivocating by the Liberal government and days of denials that a decision had been made.

    “After careful consideration of the issue, we have decided that Canada will not participate in the U.S. ballistic missile defence system,” Mr. Pettigrew said in the chamber of the House of Commons.

    He insisted that the decision – which has reportedly left the Bush administration nonplussed – will not “in any way” hurt ties with the United States.

    “We will carefully examine all options and pursue our priorities vigorously,” he said.

    The announcement came only days after Frank McKenna, the next ambassador to the United States, set off a political storm by saying that Canada is already participating in the missile shield. He said that an amendment to NORAD, the continental joint air-defence pact, meant that Canada's de facto participation had begun.

    Mr. McKenna made his comments on Tuesday, about the time, Mr. Martin has now acknowledged, that the United States received the formal refusal from Canada.

    “The official Canadian position was conveyed by Foreign Minister Pettigrew to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice at our meetings in Brussels,” he told reporters.

    “Since then, I have discussed it with ambassador Cellucci, Mr. Graham has discussed it with [Deputy Defence Secretary Paul] Wolfowitz in the United States and I would expect to be discussing it again, with President Bush, hopefully today or in the very near future.”

    Mr. Martin's timeline contradicts comments from government MPs this week in the House of Commons, where opposition politicians were told that they would be informed “when a decision is made.”

    On both Tuesday and Wednesday, Defence Minister Bill Graham insisted that nothing had changed on the missile-defence file and that a decision was forthcoming.

    The minority Liberals could have lost if missile defence had come to a vote in the House of Commons. A number of senior government sources have recently told reporters in The Globe and Mail's Ottawa bureau that the federal government felt that the deep unpopularity of missile defence among Canadians made further participation a non-starter.

    Mr. Pettigrew said that Canada will continue to contribute to the security of the continent through the expanded mandate of NORAD, the joint continental defence pact that will track incoming missiles, and an integrated response to maritime threats

    “We will enhance the protection of North America,” he said. “...We will work closely to build the success of [border agreements] and engage Mexico to trilateralize, to better align our roles, priorities and interests.”

    Mr. Martin said in his comments, moments later, that the Liberal's military priorities are “the ones that we set out yesterday” in the budget, primarily borders, Arctic sovereignty, coastal defence, intelligence-gathering and increasing the size of the army.

    link
     
  2. RocketMan Tex

    RocketMan Tex Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    18,452
    Likes Received:
    119
    Breaking news....Canadian Club Whiskey will now be re-bottled and re-named Freedom Club Whiskey for distribution in the U.S.

    :rolleyes:

    Canada knows a boondoggle when they see one. Unfortunately, for US Taxpayers, the current administration would rather spend money like a crackhead on a binge, just to keep their major contributors happy. For those of you with children, I sincerely hope your grandchildren enjoy footing the bill for the mess we are in now.
     
  3. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,862
    Likes Received:
    41,377
    Why would they want to buy something that doesn't work? They're not that stupid.
     
  4. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    129,273
    Likes Received:
    39,832
    Weren't you Canadian for a time Glynch?

    ;)
     
  5. snowmt01

    snowmt01 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2003
    Messages:
    1,734
    Likes Received:
    1
    Which country will drop H-Bombs or N-Bombs on Canada?

    None.
     
  6. VooDooPope

    VooDooPope Love > Hate

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 1999
    Messages:
    9,244
    Likes Received:
    4,750
    I agree with not wanting to buy something that doesn't work but that hasn't stopped them in the past.

    Ask them about their $115 million dollar gun registration system they paid < 2 Billion dollars for (and growing).
     
  7. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,082
    Likes Received:
    3,605
    I could be wrong, but aren't we just going to give them Canucks the missile "defense" thing without charge.?

    Of course, they probably feel they're safer if they aren't identified with the anti-Muslim and anti-Arab policies of the USA. They might even support international law and therefore UN black helicopters who want to steal their "recious bodily fluids". Damn cowards and quiche eating girlie men those Canuckstanis. Don't they realize that a strict and hence Godly father is always hated by child like cultures and nations.

    If the Canuckstanis keep up this behavior with rejecting Starwars and unionizing Walmart we might have to sick the National Endowment for Democracy on them. They better not forget about Haiti or Venezuela. I hope they don't think their elections will protect them from the National Endowment for Democracy.

    Point of information. Does Canada have nukes? If they do, then I guess we will just have to tolerate them some more.::rolleyes:
     
  8. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,082
    Likes Received:
    3,605
    Weren't you Canadian for a time Glynch?

    Almost. Fortunately, Nixon ended the draft before I was going to emigrate there.

    Too cold for me. Besides I like it here. Just hate a lot of the politics of this pseudo fascist so called "conservative movement". They're not your Eisenhauer Repbuplicans of the type my parents voted for.
     
  9. HayesStreet

    HayesStreet Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 1999
    Messages:
    8,507
    Likes Received:
    181
    Polls indicate Canadians reject the shield because it might cause an international arms race, not because they don't think it will work, or because they don't want to be identified as allied with the US.

    As for Wal-Mart, nice move. The store was losing money and they shouldn't be forced to accept union hacking up the process.
     
  10. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,792
    Likes Received:
    41,232
    I'm still a bit confused by the story. Could Mango, or some other member who might aspire to come close to his abilities, find out exactly what is going on, and put it in English? Canada owns their airspace. They are a sovereign country who can make it's own decisions about it's defense. They are another ally of decades standing that the Bush Administration seems to have ticked off. And, knowing some Canadians, and having been there, I care about their opinion. Also, if they get ticked off enough, they could decide to abrogate their defense treaties with the United States. Some here may laugh, and say, "Who cares?? It's Canada!" Well, I care.


    And Wal-Mart can kiss my ***. We booted their butt out of SW Austin, and I'm glad.





    Keep D&D Civil!!
     
  11. Grizzled

    Grizzled Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2000
    Messages:
    2,756
    Likes Received:
    40
    “We simply cannot understand…”

    And this is why no one wants to have anything to do with this administration. They really, truly, don’t understand.

    At a high level this issue is about cosmetics, on both sides. The Bush administration wants Canada as a supporter to lend credence to what they are doing. They don’t want any money or any material involvement at all, I believe. Canada and the world are against this because we feel that it will lead to the weaponizaion of space, which we don’t want and we certainly don’t want this administration doing. The US feels that if Canada would agree to be involved then it would look better on the home front and maybe they could pressure some more countries to get on board too.

    On the Canadian home front Martin leads a minority government, and Canadians are overwhelmingly against this proposal, especially in Quebec. Bush was pushing hard for Canadian approval on his recent visit and applied considerable pressure. The US is playing games with tariffs and bans these days and has placed large, unfair, tariffs on Canadian softwood lumber (which have been found to be unfair by NAFTA but by the time that process took its course thousands of people had lost their jobs and mills had gone bankrupt) and bans on Canadian beef (even though BSE was found on both sides of the boarder and the North American cattle industry has been integrated for years meaning that whatever is up here will also be down there). There have been suggestions that Bush offered to address these issues if Martin would support Bush’s plans to weaponize space. But this issue could have toppled Martin’s government so he really had no choice, which is a good thing.

    How many more days before Bush is gone? The world will breathe a lot more easily when this group of bad actors is off the scene.
     
  12. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,082
    Likes Received:
    3,605
    Canadians reject the shield because it might cause an international arms race

    This is a very valid reason. Arms races just waste money. Hayes,hopefully you consider an arms race a bad thing. I know the miitary industrial complex sure missed it when the Russkies dropped out of the arms race.
     
  13. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,082
    Likes Received:
    3,605
    the North American cattle industry has been integrated for years meaning that whatever is up here will also be down there). There have been suggestions that Bush offered to address these issues if Martin would support Bush’s plans to weaponize space.

    This ties in with the European thread. Bush bullies and bribes, but still does not accomplish what previous American governments accomplished through normal diplomacy.
     
  14. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,792
    Likes Received:
    41,232

    And that sums up what we've seen since he was elected to office. A man over his head, surrounded by bad advisors, who pulls those bad advisors ever closer, as he shuts out those who don't tell him what he wants to hear.




    Keep D&D Civil!!
     
  15. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,821
    Likes Received:
    5,225
    "This year will go down in history. For the first time a civilized nation has full gun registration. Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!"

    - Adolf Hitler, 1935
     
  16. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    45,954
    Likes Received:
    28,049
    That shady Hitler quote is fake
     
  17. krosfyah

    krosfyah Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2001
    Messages:
    7,816
    Likes Received:
    1,631
    I will never buy another piece of Candian bacon

    ...unless Dominoes offers a buy 2 get 1 free topping special.
     
  18. Grizzled

    Grizzled Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2000
    Messages:
    2,756
    Likes Received:
    40
    This is exactly how it looks from my perspective too.

    The gun registry is a genuine boondoggle, though, and I’m a proponent of gun control in general. The problem with that program is that it never made any sense to begin with. It was created in the early 90’s at a time when angry, self-righteous, self-serving “political correctness” was running rampant and masquerading as truly well thought-out, self-less, genuinely progressive thinking and policy. It was in large part a response to the Montreal Massacre.
    http://archives.cbc.ca/IDD-1-70-398/disasters_tragedies/montreal_massacre/

    Unfortunately it was an emotional and largely irrational initiative that many people supported uncritically largely because its proponents drew on the emotional atmosphere created in the wake of the massacre. In fact it will do nothing to control the types of weapons Lepine used (it was an illegal weapon at the time) and will create significant and largely pointless headaches for farmers and rural people who tend to own hunting rifles and shotguns. These are not the guns that are creating the bulk of our serious problems. The Toronto police chief recently said that over half of the gun crimes in Toronto have been committed with guns smuggled in from the US. Similar things are being said here in Calgary where we’ve had a rash of gun crimes and even a couple of gang related drive by shootings. Criminals have a hard time getting these guns in Canada because of our generally very effective gun control laws, but unfortunately they are spilling in over the boarder from a country that has probably the most regressive gun laws of any first world country, and consequently many Canadians are being killed by illegal American handguns.
    http://www.cbc.ca/disclosure/archives/030218_guns/blackmarket.html
    http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/TorontoSun/News/2004/02/08/340042.html
     
  19. wizardball

    wizardball Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    376
    Likes Received:
    0
    CANADA RULES... so quit b*tching about us....that is my argument:D
     
  20. F.D. Khan

    F.D. Khan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2000
    Messages:
    2,456
    Likes Received:
    11

    I'd rather have an Arms Race than a war like we did with the Soviet Union. Reagan's arms race bankrupted the soviet union because our capitalist system lets our government have more money than a communist/socialist system.

    That arms-race may have prevented World War III, and for a while made us the unquestionable only superpower.
     

Share This Page