What I have found really interesting over the last few games is that you can actually SEE the guys trying to make changes in their games, and it's obvious that it's because of what the coaches have been demanding of them. I say trying.. The next step will be actually making it truly work: Lemme 'splain: If you watch, for example, KT, you will see him, from time to time, make some kind of a move into the lane, say up near the FT line on the right side.. get in there with his back to the basket, and pass out to someone (Mooch, SF, whoever). In the past, and with apologies to all the 'Kenny is a black hole' moaners out there, he WOULD have done his usual whirling-dervish bit, and tried to just get in there and put up a shot. But now you can actually see the little hamster turn in the wheel and see him actually make a conscious effort to pass - obviously because that is what he has been told to do. It almost reminds me of that scene in Hoosiers, where the coach demanded a certain number of passes before anyone was allowed to shoot. And just like in the movie, the point was not to pass for the sake of passing, but to force such an unnatural act to become natural, through repitition. This is the stage where the Rox are now. Many of the passes we make now are still 'passes for passes sake', just like in the movie. If you watch the results of many of our passes, you can see that they are 'static', ie they do not actually do anything to advance the offense or help get a score. As with the example of KT's pass the other night, for example. All it really did was run time off the clock, and leave a man standing outside, with the ball, with time running out. It's almost as if we have substituted the 'dribble-it-til-the-shot-clock-is-at-4-seconds-before-I-jack-a-shot' offense for the 'make a couple of passes, but still end up with the same result a lot of the time' offense. Compare that to the way Sacramento played against us the other night - they passed with *purpose*, and they handed our guys' heads to them in a doggie bag. Our guys were making the effort to pass, but it was often without purpose. At least we were making the passes. But anyway, this is actually a good thing. Because it shows that 1) the guys are really trying to listen to Rudy, and do what he wants, 2) that Rudy is actually cracking the whip on these guys to go against their habits, and 3) they are (slowly but surely) getting better at it. I mean, is it any wonder that the one guy for whom this comes naturally, Yao, has almost overnight become the most important member of the team? Of course not. Encouragingly, it seems that many of his teammates have, at least in their minds, begun to understand that the more of them who embrace and nurture this skill, the better they ALL will become. Just like few people would have predicted the current state of the team after only seeing their progress in the first 3 or 4 games, so too is the current state of the team in no way a true indicator of where this bunch will be at the halfway point, and beyond that the end of the season. As the unnatural becomes natural, as making the 'right pass' moves from being the result of a deliberate conscious thought process to the unthinking, automatic-reflex kind of action such as one sees when a good shooter is simply stroking the ball into the hole (that's why so often a player misses that wide open jumper, he suddeny 'thinks' about the shot, and bam! it wouldn't even go in with vaseline), THEN you will see this team become a force to be feared in the league. Let's watch this issue and try to compare against the later stages of the season, and see if these guys have continued to make the progress they have shown so far. Ciao
very nice post nero. although i still think KT holds the ball too long and takes ill advised jumpshots more often than not. every time he posts up and or jacks up a shot i get that "No! No! No! YES!!!!" feeling...sort of like when Barkley would put up a three. and if there's one thing that irks me about the Rockets it's when they isolate KT when Ming is on the floor too. What's up with that?