[CainTruth.com] Herman Cain innocent of sexual advances

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/wXLmP4phO3Y" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

This PI is obviously on to something:

If Herman Cain encountered on average 10 women per day, and Herman Cain is 65 years old, Herman Cain has theoretically encountered 237,250 women in his life.

If Herman Cain only sexually harassed 5 women, then he has only sexually harassed 0.0021% of the women he has encountered, which is nearly zero.

Even Herman Cain admitted that there are thousands of women he has not sexually harassed...

I believe him.

 

Waiting on Monica to make a case...

 

Hey, Sandusky only raped .001% of the boys he met in his life.

 

It's not a lie if you believe it Jerry.

 

Whatever the truth is, I don't really want someone who has multiple women making these kinds of allegations against him as my next president....especially when one or more go public with it. So, it worked.

I don't believe there is any chance he will be next president now.

 

If you have anything in your closet, you should not be running for president. There is no way you can hide anything once you are even remotely close to the presidency.

 

AS IF

 

So you get the point...

Facts are simple and facts are straight
Facts are lazy and facts are late
Facts all come with points of view
Facts don't do what i want them to
Facts just twist the truth around
Facts are living turned inside out
Facts are getting the best of them

 

Here is the original article from "CBS 46 in Atlanta" that is being sourced in that Cain link.

Link to article:
http://www.cbsatlanta.com/story/16002149/investigator-herman-cain-innocent-of-sexual-advances

Link to video:
http://www.cbsatlanta.com/video?autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId=6436372

 

That is another thing that is wrong with our politics. I don't think we can or should expect only Puritans to run for office. We all have things that we aren't proud of and I am not sure its a good thing that people running for president should be expected to have everything about them aired in public.

Consider do if given the environment we have now could JFK, womanizer and addicted to pain killers, be elected or Lincoln, chronicly depressed?

I'm not saying this to defend Herman Cain, frankly whether he did or did not isn't the primary factor in whether I would vote for him, but just saying in general.

 

Cain just flat-out bothers me, like Gingrich. They have contempt for those around them and have hot tempers. I don't want someone with that kind of temperament in the White House (now, I think Bush had a temper, but he hid it in public- if these guys act like this in public, imagine them when no cameras are around). Plus, Cain does not seem to have a good grasp of issues. I could care less about the harassment, to a point. If it's not proven, then you can't hold him liable for it.

 

What's the clinical percentage of women presenting traits of masochism?

 

Here's the best way for Cain to rebut these allegations:

1. Create a website called FightTheSmears.com
2. Get your buddies at Snopes and Fact Check to write things favorable to your case
3. Get your buddies in the media to commit to not bringing up the issue -- like a Journolist thing
4. Distract, Intimidate and Marginalize anyone who brings up the issue. Call them names, bring up sidebar issues when they attack you, and paint them as lunatics.

It's worked for Barry Soetoro for all these years, the man who is living a total lie.

 

birther sighting :grin:

 

Cain hires the same lawyer that defended Richard Jewel from defamation, and these women all get quiet all of a sudden and decide not to do any more talking.

Funny how all these sexual harassment claims come from Chicago, even though Cain has never lived there.

It's not like Chicago is known for that sort of thing...

 

Deep dish pizza or black politicans? Cause otherwise this post doesn't make sense.