1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Britain Furious at "Extraordinary" French Statement

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by MadMax, Mar 13, 2003.

  1. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    This is EXACTLY what the Germans admitted to the day Powell came and presented. I don't have a direct quote, by the German ambassador said something like, "it didn't matter what Powell presented today...it would not change our minds." Who's not cooperating? What kind of approach is that? No matter what the evidence or what the alternative, we won't consider it?

    http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=386619

    Britain furious at 'extraordinary' French statement
    AP and PA
    13 March 2003


    France today rejected the new British proposal setting out six conditions for Iraq's disarmament, bringing a swift and undiplomatic response from Downing Street.

    Instead, Baghdad must be given a realistic deadline to get rid of its weapons of mass destruction, the French Foreign Minister, Dominique de Villepin, said in a statement.

    "It's not about giving a few more days to Iraq before resorting to force but about resolutely advancing through peaceful disarmament."

    His comments drew an outspoken response from the UK Foreign Secretary. Speaking outside Number 10, Jack Straw said the "extraordinary" statement made a peaceful resolution of the crisis "more difficult".

    Britain would continue to seek support for its eminently reasonable tests today and tomorrow, he said.

    "What I however find extraordinary is that without even proper consideration the French Government decided they will reject these proposals adding to the statement that whatever the circumstances France will vote no'," he said.

    "When we negotiated resolution 1441 we not only placed obligations and responsibilities on Saddam Hussein but we also placed obligations and responsibilities on members of the security council as well.

    "And those obligations were to see through the process of disarmament – hopefully something we continue to pray for by peaceful means.

    "But if not that that would have to happen by way of what the resolution called serious consequence – which everybody knew meant, sadly, the use of force.

    "What we are seeking to do is by this suggestion, these proposals of these tests, to ensure that even at this late stage there is a means by which Saddam can show reasonably that he is coming in to compliance with his obligations going back to 1991.

    "And whatever the difficulties we face – and particularly the kind of statements which we are hearing from across the Channel – we will continue to work for this peaceful end.

    "But I have to say, such statements rejecting the obligations on all of us, obviously make that process more difficult."

    M. de Villepin said the British proposals "do not respond to the questions the international community is asking. It's not about giving a few more days to Iraq before resorting to force but about resolutely advancing through peaceful disarmament."

    Britain tabled the list of conditions for Iraq's disarmamentat the United Nations yesterdsay hoping to break the impasse in the Security Council.

    M. De Villepin said he believes weapons inspections in Iraq are "producing results" and that France supports all the countries of the Security Council that want to "give Iraq a realistic delay for reaching effective disarmament."

    France said it does not support the idea of an ultimatum. It wants to "set out a framework for inspections with a work program and a precise calendar," M. de Villepin said.
     
  2. Rocket Fan

    Rocket Fan Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 1999
    Messages:
    4,791
    Likes Received:
    4
    This isnt' directly on topic, but why do some of the nations have this "veto" power.....

    I know we have it too.... but whats the point of even getting a majority vote when there is always one nation that can block it single handidly?
     
  3. Cohen

    Cohen Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 1999
    Messages:
    10,751
    Likes Received:
    6
    I've heard the French politicians say this many times, but I've yet to hear them admit that the results are ONLY because of the pressure exerted on Iraq by the US and UK. Just another reason to believe that this is just a political 'thing' for the French gov.

    I also heard a report that the Franch felt slighted after Gulf War I when they did not get the Kuwaiti contracts they hoped for, even after contributing to the fight.
     
  4. Mr. Clutch

    Mr. Clutch Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    46,550
    Likes Received:
    6,132
    Yes! This is a complete joke. And people want to argue about Americans being too aggressive with "Freedom Fries." :rolleyes:

    We need to wake up and smell the coffee. The reality is France doesn't give a crap about us, and if we keep waiting for their (worthless) approval on this war, then we may get hurt. What if the ideal time for war has passed? How many deaths will it cost? What if the North Korean situation becomes worse? How much money are we losing by waiting?

    I have no problem discussing whether this war is a good idea. But I think it is a terrible idea to try to convince France. They aren't even a very important ally anymore (and they know it, which is why they are doing this).
     
  5. B-Bob

    B-Bob "94-year-old self-described dreamer"
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    35,986
    Likes Received:
    36,840
    LMAO! :D No. Some expected less juvenile behavior from our elected officials. Well, strike that. Some of us would like to expect less juvenile behavior. In any case, it's not "too aggressive." "Freedom Fries" is simply the most ignorant and hilarious thing I may have ever heard. Well, until some good CC net soul posted "Freedom Tickler!" That was even better. :D
     
  6. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    No one said aggressive. They said petty and a waste of time...which it is.
     
  7. Cohen

    Cohen Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 1999
    Messages:
    10,751
    Likes Received:
    6
    Another reported concern of French leaders is that the Iraqi people will cheer coalition forces as liberators, and the French will not be there.
     
  8. B-Bob

    B-Bob "94-year-old self-described dreamer"
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    35,986
    Likes Received:
    36,840
    I disagree, RM,

    Freedom Fries has allowed me to chuckle to myself spontaneously all week, and that (selfishly) has been a wonderful thing. So it's not a complete waste of time, maybe, but then, like an unintentionally bad film, it's just not having the intended effect.
     
  9. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    That is true B-Bob, so homosexually true.
     
  10. Sonny

    Sonny Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2001
    Messages:
    5,436
    Likes Received:
    8
    Listen to the expert on "homo" B-Bob. :p
     
  11. B-Bob

    B-Bob "94-year-old self-described dreamer"
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    35,986
    Likes Received:
    36,840
    Well, I guess you'd be the one to know. :p

    (I got that zinger from a newly appointed American diplomat! Pretty good, huh?)

    Seriously, what is with your sig now?

    edit: RM95's sig. (Sorry, Sonny, you beat me to the punch!)
     
    #11 B-Bob, Mar 13, 2003
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2003
  12. Sonny

    Sonny Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2001
    Messages:
    5,436
    Likes Received:
    8
    Me or RM95?
     
  13. Mr. Clutch

    Mr. Clutch Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    46,550
    Likes Received:
    6,132
    If that's petty then what do you call what France is doing. They are being petty on a worldwide scale with real consequences. They should at least make a stand based on actual reasons.
     
  14. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    RM95...how do you feel about all this? your opinion interests me...what do you think of more inspections? more time? 1441? anything else that's related??
     
  15. Mr. Clutch

    Mr. Clutch Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    46,550
    Likes Received:
    6,132

    That's true. Everytime I see it on tv my internal BS meter goes off and I immediately change the channel. It's something mayors from small towns should be doing (no offense if anyone's a small- town mayor :)

    "Abortions for some and miniature American flags for everyone else!"
     
  16. Timing

    Timing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2000
    Messages:
    5,308
    Likes Received:
    1


    This is no different from what the Bush administration has done. If you don't vote our way you're irrelevant. The French response is well we don't care what you say either. Somehow I doubt Bush will learn the lesson here.
     
  17. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,810
    Likes Received:
    20,467
    It's ridiculous to not listen to the facts, and then decide. Why make up someone's mind before all the facts are in. That goes to the French and German side as well as the American side.

    I'll admit that after watching and listening to all the arguments I changed from staunchly anti-war with Iraq, to at least considering that it might be necessary. I'm still undecided, at least that it's needed at the present time, but I think it's ridiculous for any side not to listen to the other.
     
  18. Mr. Clutch

    Mr. Clutch Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    46,550
    Likes Received:
    6,132
    Actually France is irrelevant because they have little political influence outside of the UN. China, Japan, and India are all probably more politically important. It has nothing to do with the vote, but a "No" vote by France risks the US going anyways and their irrelevance becoming all the more clearer.
     
  19. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    I considered someone would post that response...but I really don't think that's the case. The UK and the US both have floated plans...the US has held off...it's not like we're attacking as we speak.

    What the French ultimately said today is there is no other plan, other than further inspections, that will every satisfy them. Couple that with the German response which said, "it doesn't matter what evidence you produce, our minds are made up," and you're forced to ask the question, "then why sign the UN order to begin with?"
     
  20. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    I've been ready to go for a while now. Even though I'm not positive that the evidence is there that they are in possession of WMD, I think it's been clear for some time now that Saddam was only doing the bare minimum to appease some of those in the U.N.

    I do think that Bush (and his admin) massively screwed up getting international support, even though it appears that it may have been moot anyway. However, there's no telling how our relationships with some countires will be affected a long way down the road, and that's what is troubling to me.

    There seems to be a good enough link between Iraq and terrorism/Al-Qaeda to warrant an invasion, but what troubles me is that if the link was stronger, we should've gone in a long time ago. If you want to argue that Saddam had something to do with 9/11, I don't see any reason to bother with the UN as our soil was attacked. However, whether or not there's a clear link between Saddam and 9/11, there appears to be evidence of Saddam and terrorism in other parts of the globe (Philipenes) for me to support a regime change by almost any means necessary.

    Of course, I probably could've just started this post by saying that I'm for intervention in almost all cases where there's a murderous dictator killing his own people.

    I just get bothered by all this boycott stuff (even though it's within people's rights), because I really think it's petty, and I don't think France is doing it out of pettiness. Like someone pointed out, they've given us the most support in the war in Afghanistan. If that's true, why are they all of the sudden anti-American? Maybe they truly disagree with us on this one, and while I disagree with them, I don't see the point in having Congress waste time and money changing the names of menu items, and crap like that. We should be bigger than that and the next time France or Germany is in trouble and needs our assistence, I really hope we're not the kind of country that says no because of this.

    B-Bob, it's from a Simpsons' episode. Mr. Burns is leading callisthenics, and he says as he's pushing out his arms then pulling them back in, "push out the jive, bring in the love".
     

Share This Page