aggie???? Hey, dude... at least let us know the article might be NSFW with naked chicks on the article and side ads.
I didn't even see the small print. I'm sorry, I didn't consider that to be NSFW. Next time I will put the warning to be on the safe side.
I guess I'm "uber" conservative... but I think anything with a chick wearing only a bra would be considered NSFW, also, not just the ads. Many would disagree, but I can't have that on my screen at my workplace.
bra type and poop in the title wasnt enough NSFW?? what did you expect? a nun talking about metamucil?
YES, I'm afraid so, at my workplace, where I am viewing. Good googly moogly, no. No, Mr. Sajan, sir. It could be that the article doesn't contain fortuitous pictures of people in undergarments. Like this: http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/fashion/summer_support_group_p2cLb8LjLKT6YWVssezG2J
Considering your very short track record of making horrible threads and posting just to increase your post count(which does NOTHING for you), Im gonna guess there wont be a "next time".