Billy Hunter Slime Ball I guess Derek Fisher had a good reason to want an audit: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-...roils-nba-union-as-players-question-hire.html
Yeah, the nepotism doesn't sound appropriate. It sounds like Hunter has too much power in deciding who to contract. But, the executive committee is made up of elected players, so if Hunter can convince them then so be it.
But yet some folks were calling Fisher the dirty one in this matter. The guy has been a dirty player but in this case I see nothing wrong with Fisher's stance and I might be wrong but it seems Hunter wants Fisher out because Fisher wanted the audit.
Agreed. You read between the lines on this one, and Billy Hunter is the one who looks dirty, not Fisher. I mean, Hunter has even hired a PR company, which means he knows it looks bad.
Keyon Dooling, James Jones, Matt Bonner, Roger Mason, Maurice Evans, Chris Paul, Theo Ratliff, and Etan Thomas have a lot more information about it than we do and they have a personal stake in what Billy Hunter does with union dues. They not only side with Hunter, but they want Fisher out. The potential conflict of interest of nepotism is so apparent, even pro basketball players that skipped half their college courses can see it. So, I don't think it is that straight-forward. Hunter and Fisher had a bit of a power struggle during the lockout and each, I think, wants the other out. Fisher seized upon the nepotism as a pretext and he got outflanked. That's how I see it.
Hunter saying his "highly-credentialed" relatives are receiving "at or below market value" is disingenuous at best. How much real work are they doing? Are they "side-benefitting" from Hunter's gigantic salary?
Fisher is doing the ethically clean thing to try to get rid of Hunter's brood, but it really looks like he's doing it in the wrong way. The fact that all the other players on the executive committee are against him is a very bad sign. What it looks like is Fisher has just gotten fed up with Hunter, and decided that the whole world needs to see what a jerk Hunter is. But there are a couple of problems with this. First, it's no surprise Hunter is a sleazy jerk. That's exactly what lawyers are paid to be. Second, if Fisher can't even convince the other players on the committee to side with him, then he must have a weak case. Fisher is almost certainly going to be kicked out. If he's lucky, Hunter will be kicked out too. But what players are going to spend the time to make sure that happens?
and the poopoo officially hits the fan. every person on the Executive Committee that was part of that disgraceful 8-0 vote against Fisher should resign immediately and make apologies to Fisher and every union member he was supposed to be looking out for. Just disgusting. Billy Hunter has exploited these guys long enough. NBA players shouldn't even need a union. All their dues go to this slimeball's pocket. It's a tremendously long read, but WELL worth it to see the scope of this thing. Billy Hunter should be in jail for the way he's screwed these guys. http://sports.yahoo.com/news/nba--n...ion-investment-for-bank-with-ties-to-son.html
All indications seem to be that Hunter is extensively engaged in nepotism to the detriment of the union, but I can't understand why the executive committee (besides Fisher) isn't willing to do anything about it. They say they are satisfied with Hunter's explanations, but I can't see how. Are they afraid they won't be able to find a comparably skilled person to take his place? Is there some retributive action that Hunter has in his pocket? I don't get it.
to be fair, this is the same group of players that has people like Antonie Walker who is bankrupt after earning tens of millions in the NBA
Wow - seems like Hunter is using the union as his and his families own personal piggy bank. How dare Garrity question Hunter....lol...... What is the makeup of that executive committee?
I hate to be generalizing but if the players stayed in college a couple more years and took things seriously, they might understand things like finances much better.
I agree with JuanValdez here. Hunter's abuse of his position is so apparent that any coherent individual should be able see it. There must be some dirt on Fisher or he must be an insufferable *******. That 8-0 vote against him does not make sense otherwise.
yeah, i'm trying to figure it out as well. even if hunter's kids are qualified, i'm guessing so are many other people. the fact that the needle just happens to keep landing on "relative of billy hunter" for each position, one of which is basically the party planning committee and another which appears to have been created out of thin air, is just too shady. and the part where the firm that hired his daughter immediately got union business and then the firm she went to next immediately got that old business was probably the most damning part to me. and yet the 8-0 vote by the executive committee against fisher. the players on the committe seem to be a fairly disparate group of players. it's hard to imagine them deciding to form a conspiracy against fisher for no particular reason. and if hunter is behind it, it's hard to see what sort of money or power (or taking away of money and power) he could be using to entice them to be against fisher. i think chris paul was one of the members and the sum total of all the benefits mentioned in the article comes out to about 1/3 of his yearly salary i think so what would paul really have to gain? the article doesn't seem to leave much doubt that hunter is dirty so it will be interesting to see what comes out about fisher or the deliberations of the executive committee. instead of missing out on millions of dollars for a couple more years of history 101 and advanced basket weaving to go with a financial course here or there, the ones who really want to know more about finances could use any of their summers off to take an introductory financial class, the kind which i'm sure is offered at all sorts of locations around the country.
This is too funny. This whole situation just make both Hunter and Fish look bad. Why did Fish waited until now to expose Hunter? He could have done this years ago, where was his "character" then when he could have backed Pat Garrity?
I don't know if I'd call that 'fair.' I don't think of those 8 guys on the committee as being particularly dumb, for one. For two, these guys have access to sharp financial minds through their agents. For three, the journalists are laying out all the information on a silver platter. Somebody must have told all these guys by now that Hunter's nepotism is inappropriate and to the detriment of union resources. So, they either are afraid of Hunter, or they love him and his family so much, or they know they will be in a worse spot without Hunter.