1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

BBC accused by their war correspondent of slanting coverage

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by TheFreak, Mar 28, 2003.

  1. TheFreak

    TheFreak Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 1999
    Messages:
    18,308
    Likes Received:
    3,329
    This looks like it may be from a tabloid, but it was also reported in this Washington Post article, where BBC News Director Richard Sambrook OPENLY ADMITS they are biased in their coverage:

    "If we were simply to take the justification for the war, we would have lost half our audience," he says. "There's a strong body of opinion in Europe that the grounds for this war haven't been proven and aren't clear. Our coverage has to reflect that."

    Hmmm....why not just report what's happening?



    BBC's own man blasts
    his bosses over 'bias'


    By TREVOR KAVANAGH
    Political Editor

    THE BBC was last night sensationally condemned for “one-sided” war coverage — by its own front line defence correspondent.

    Paul Adams attacks the Beeb for misreporting the Allied advance in a blistering memo leaked to The Sun.

    And he warned the BBC’s credibility is at risk for suggesting British troops are paying a “high price for small victories”.

    On Monday, he wrote from US Central Command in Qatar: “I was gobsmacked to hear, in a set of headlines today, that the coalition was suffering ‘significant casualties’.

    “This is simply NOT TRUE. Nor is it true to say — as the same intro stated — that coalition forces are fighting ‘guerrillas’.

    “It may be guerrilla warfare, but they are not guerrillas.”

    Adams’ memo was fired off to TV news head Roger Mosey, Radio news boss Stephen Mitchell and other Beeb chiefs.

    It adds stunning weight to allegations that BBC coverage on all its networks is biased against the war.

    In one blast, he storms: “Who dreamed up the line that the coalition are achieving ‘small victories at a very high price?’

    “The truth is exactly the opposite.


    “The gains are huge and the costs still relatively low. This is real warfare, however one-sided, and losses are to be expected.”

    The BBC has come under attack for describing the loss of two soldiers as the “worst possible news for the armed forces”.

    One listener asked: “How would the BBC have reported the Battle of the Somme in World War I when 25,000 men died on the first day?”


    This BBC defense correspondent has obviously been spending too much time watching Fox News.
     
  2. ROXTXIA

    ROXTXIA Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    20,954
    Likes Received:
    13,110
    Do our media outlets "just report what's happening"?

    Nope. So many people talk about the liberal media, but I don't see it, not for awhile now. No one's gonna rock the boat. And the administration/military will control most of what we see.

    A lot of people support this war, or have relatives fighting over there, so anything that might shed negative light on the war is usually stifled pretty quickly.

    And then you have media outlets with close ties to the administration. I wish I could remember these names, but apparently one of the head honchos at Fox "News" is cousin to the Bush family; and the guy in charge of Clear Channel broadcasting (successfully homogenizing all the music and news reported on many nationwide radio stations) bought the Texas Rangers when our current President was in charge of the team. Made GWB a few bucks, too.
     
  3. RocketMan Tex

    RocketMan Tex Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    18,452
    Likes Received:
    119
    The only media outlets that are reporting what is truly happening are those that are independent of the conflict itself...non-US based, non-British based, and non-Middle East based media outlets.
     
  4. goophers

    goophers Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2000
    Messages:
    888
    Likes Received:
    16
    I don't think even that is true. I have seen a couple Chinese-based and Russian-based media outlets that were pretty biased as well.
     
  5. Easy

    Easy Boban Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    38,400
    Likes Received:
    29,997
    French based? :D
     
  6. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,111
    Likes Received:
    15,327
    That's funny.
     

Share This Page