Interesting read. Lock if posted. http://nba.fanhouse.com/2009/12/29/are-there-any-tracy-mcgrady-trade-possibilities/ With the news that the Rockets and Tracy McGrady have decided to separate, the next step is finding the aging All-Star a new home for the season. It's a tricky situation, with Houston unlikely to take on much long-term salary without decent talent coming back, and with few teams willing to give up valuable assets for McGrady's slowing game and massive expiring contract. But there are a few options out there. Keep in mind that these are ideas, not rumors. Solving Problems in Chicago? Chicago has been a frequent mention with regard to McGrady, and there are a couple deals which might make sense. One fairly simple idea would swap McGrady for three expiring-contract Bulls: Brad Miller, Tyrus Thomas and John Salmons. The trade keeps Chicago under the luxury tax threshold, while adding less than $1 million to Houston's payroll. It seems like the Bulls are giving up too much talent for what is essentially an expiring contract, right? But losing Salmons and Thomas actually clears up a few things for Chicago. Salmons has an early termination option this summer many believe he will invoke, becoming an unrestricted free agent. Salmons is owed $5.8 million next season should he skip the termination option, and that's a vital $5.8 million for Chicago, who hopes to be far enough under the salary cap to offer a player like Dwyane Wade or Chris Bosh a maximum contract. If Salmons, who has been awful this year, keeps the $5.8 million contract alive, the Bulls have little chance of freeing up enough cash for a max player. One assumes the team would like to go into late June without the Salmons question hanging over its head. Thomas, while talented, is a similar problem for the Bulls. Even if Salmons opts out, Chicago would be faced with potentially being forced to renounce the team's rights to Thomas in order to sign a max player. Thomas would then become an unrestricted free agent (instead of a restricted free agent, in which case Chicago could match any offer sheet he signs). It's no secret Chicago and Thomas have issues, and few expect the team to pay much to keep the forward around beyond this season. Miller would also be a cap hold issue, though his Bird rights aren't nearly as valuable as those of Thomas. Why does Houston take a small amount of additional payroll to swing this deal? Well, Thomas could be a valuable player going forward if he works out in the Rockets system. Salmons (if he gets right) adds scoring punch. If he continues to play poorly, he is (worst case) a $5.8 million back-up next season. Miller thrived under Adelman in Sacramento, and could augment the frontline attack nicely this spring. I'm not sure a few months of McGrady and removing the Salmons risk is enough incentive for Chicago, but it's certainly a deal Houston could live with. Temporary Boost for the Wolves? Minnesota has no designs on a playoff run this season, but the team's backcourt scoring has been so atrocious that a midseason boost could actually add some respectability. It could send expiring contracts Mark Blount, Damien Wilkins and Brian Cardinal to the Rockets for McGrady. This deal gets Houston out from under the luxury tax without putting the Wolves over the threshold. That's a big win for Houston, roughly a $11-13 million swing when you account for tax savings plus the added pay-out non-tax teams receive. Minnesota would trade two useless players (sorry, Mark and Brian) and one player who should have a bit part only for a famous name with a (formerly) jaw-dropping game. I'm not sure McGrady's Bird rights (which Minnesota would gain) are valuable. But they are certainly more valuable than those of Blount, Cardinal and Wilkins. Uniting the Chinese Stars? New Jersey's interest in McGrady comes in two threads: the Nets will do anything to sell a ticket, and an incarnation of this idea would actually clear even more summertime cap room for the franchise. In this instance, New Jersey would give up on Yi Jianlian, a once-promising import acquired for Richard Jefferson. Houston would acquire Yi, Bobby Simmons (an expiring contract) and Tony Battie (a useful defensive center with an expiring contract). Yi has played only six games for the disastrous Nets this season. While interim coach Kiki Vandeweghe is a big Yi fan, McGrady might be a decent boost for the final few months of East Rutherford and the Chinese forward is on the books for $4 million next season. Houston, I imagine, would be happy to take on the project, especially with Yao Ming and a fantastic marketing relationship with the Middle Kingdom in place.
PLEASE do the Cago deal. Not bad at all. Any value for T-Mac that is greater than a bag of chips I will take!
Salmons, Miller, and Ty Thomas or Blount, Cardinal and Wilkins REALLY hard decision. Anyways, I put this through the espn trade machine and it works Budinger Tmac for Salmons, Miller, Ty + Trade exception
I really hope Morey reads this article and does the Bulls or the T'Wolves deal (preferably the Bulls one.)
The Rockets shouldn't trade Budinger... I like the Wolves deal if they give us the rights to Ricky Rubio and its also a good deal because Cardinal, Blount, and Wilkins are all expiring deals...
No I don't want Tyrus Thomas nor Brad Miller... They will decrease Scola's, Landry's and Budinger's minutes. And i'll take our 3 guys any day over Thomas and Miller. But they could share Ariza's minutes tough.
I really like the Chicago and New Jersey trades. Except in the New Jersey trade make it Alston instead of Battie.
A very difficult thing to do in this economy, especially since we told everyone that McGrady isn't able to help our team and we refused to showcase him.
Doesn't make any sense if they want to keep this current group of guys and the chemistry going. They need a SG and a C that can start but back up Yao next season. I HATE Brad Miller...
This is a terrible deal because we trade a guy with talent and bball IQ (Air Bud), for a bunch of scrubs. The 3-way deal with NY and CHI looks good on paper, but you have think...would Chicago be willing to take on J.Jefferies contract? It's a players option for next year which Jefferies (if smart) will pick up. If Chicago's interested in this..I'd pull the trigger and go for it. Miller would be an excellent fit in this system since he's been in RA's system in Sacramento.
KPRC mentioned one of the rumors had him going to new orleans...now this was the noon broadcast, so the sports guy wasnt there so they probably googled for info...but just incase, anything rumored from NO?
Battier and Scola before Landry and Budinger. We need young tall players with skills- we are no longer in the 'WIN NOW' Mode. Morey is building a championship team of the future
I like this a lot!! We get Miller who would fit this system PERFECTLY, and Harrington who could be our go to scorer, when Brooks or Landry are having a down game. Plus with both contracts expiring it is the best of both worlds. We would have players who could contribute to the team, and have them both expire, so we could at least make a run at some free agents this summer. A+ trade
Another person originally wanted for us to have Jefferies and Bulls to have Harrington, but I wouldn't do that trade to be honest with you, it would be the most fair since Bulls give up size and they'd probably like some in return. But I would do this trade as well.
If we do end up being able to trade TMac, we are going to probably need a trade exemption and two or three teams to get involved! It will be really interesting to see how Morey pulls this off!