1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Another reason why corn ethanol sucks

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Invisible Fan, Dec 17, 2007.

  1. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    45,954
    Likes Received:
    28,049
    Besides higher food prices, there's the "other" environmental risk.
    Corn boom could expand ‘dead zone’ in Gulf

    JEFFERSON, Iowa - Because of rising demand for ethanol, American farmers are growing more corn than at any time since World War II. And sea life in the Gulf of Mexico is paying the price.

    The nation's corn crop is fertilized with millions of pounds of nitrogen-based fertilizer. And when that nitrogen runs off fields in Corn Belt states, it makes its way to the Mississippi River and eventually pours into the Gulf, where it contributes to a growing "dead zone" — a 7,900-square-mile patch so depleted of oxygen that fish, crabs and shrimp suffocate.

    The dead zone was discovered in 1985 and has grown fairly steadily since then, forcing fishermen to venture farther and farther out to sea to find their catch. For decades, fertilizer has been considered the prime cause of the lifeless spot.
    Story continues below ↓advertisement

    With demand for corn booming, some researchers fear the dead zone will expand rapidly, with devastating consequences.

    "We might be coming close to a tipping point," said Matt Rota, director of the water resources program for the New Orleans-based Gulf Restoration Network, an environmental group. "The ecosystem might change or collapse as opposed to being just impacted."

    Environmentalists had hoped to cut nitrogen runoff by encouraging farmers to apply less fertilizer and establish buffers along waterways. But the demand for the corn-based fuel additive ethanol has driven up the price for the crop, which is selling for about $4 per bushel, up from a little more than $2 in 2002.

    That enticed American farmers — mostly in Iowa, Illinois, Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota — to plant more than 93 million acres of corn in 2007, the most since 1944. They substituted corn for other crops, or made use of land not previously in cultivation.

    Farmer: 'Try to be a good steward'
    Corn is more "leaky" than crops such as soybean and alfalfa — that is, it absorbs less nitrogen per acre. The prime reasons are the drainage systems used in corn fields and the timing of when the fertilizer is applied.

    The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that up to 210 million pounds of nitrogen fertilizer enter the Gulf of Mexico each year. Scientists had no immediate estimate for 2007, but said they expect the amount of fertilizer going into streams to increase with more acres of corn planted.

    "Corn agriculture practices release a lot of nitrogen," said Donald Scavia, a University of Michigan professor who has studied corn fertilizer's effect on the dead zone. "More corn equals more nitrogen pollution."

    Farmers realize the connection between their crop and problems downstream, but with the price of corn soaring, it doesn't make sense to grow anything else. And growing corn isn't profitable without nitrogen-based fertilizer.

    "I think you have to try to be a good steward of the land," said Jerry Peckumn, who farms corn and soybeans on about 2,000 acres he owns or leases near the Iowa community of Jefferson. "But on the other hand, you can't ignore the price of corn."

    Peckumn grows alfalfa and natural grass on the 220 or so acres he owns, but said he cannot afford to experiment on the land he rents.

    The dead zone typically begins in the spring and persists into the summer. Its size and location vary each year because of currents, weather and other factors, but it is generally near the mouth of the Mississippi.

    This year, it is the third-biggest on record. It was larger in 2002 and 2001, when it covered 8,500 and 8,006 square miles respectively.

    Soil erosion, sewage and industrial pollution also contribute to the dead zone, but fertilizer is believed to be the chief factor.
    Story continues below ↓advertisement

    Fertilizer causes explosive growth of algae, which then dies and sinks to the bottom, where it sucks up oxygen as it decays. This creates a deep layer of oxygen-depleted ocean where creatures either escape or die.

    Marine life struggle to survive
    Bottom-dwelling species such as crabs and oysters are most at risk, said Michelle Perez, an analyst with the Washington-based Environmental Working Group. "They struggle to survive," Perez said. "They can't swim away."

    Crabbers complained at a meeting in Louisiana earlier this year that they pulled up bucket upon bucket of dead crabs.

    Rota warned that if the corn boom continues, the Gulf of Mexico could see an "ecological regime change." The fear is that the zone will grow so big that most sea life won't be able to escape it, leading to an even bigger die-off.

    "People's livelihood depends on the shrimp, fish and crabs in these waters," he said. "Already, some of these shrimpers are traveling longer and longer distances to catch anything."

    Given the market pressure to grow corn, the Natural Resources Defense Council and others argue that the nation needs a comprehensive, federal approach to the problem.

    Among the ideas floated: rules to force farmers to use fertilizers with more care, and the establishment of buffer zones to contain runoff.
     
  2. geeimsobored

    geeimsobored Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Messages:
    8,968
    Likes Received:
    3,389
    Its not that ethanol sucks, its just that the corn-based ethanol we produce is inefficient, and environmentally damaging. But of course, the agriculture industry has continually lobbied to maintain sugar tariffs that prevent a sugar-ethanol industry that is far more efficient and environmentally friendly.

    In short, Ag Subsidies suck.
     
  3. rodrick_98

    rodrick_98 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2000
    Messages:
    4,362
    Likes Received:
    6
    but both are inferior to biodiesel.
     
  4. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    Understatement of the year award.

    Corn produces 400 gallons of ethanol per acre.
    Switch grass produces 2300 gallons per acre.
    Algae would yield 8000 gallons of biodiesel and 5000 gallons of ethanol per acre (and it's a closed system and it can use salt water)

    The corn ethanol mandate is straight-up pandering to the agricultural lobby - there is NO economic/scientific justification for corn-based ethanol production.
     
  5. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,168
    Likes Received:
    48,335
    Even living in corn based ethanol country I completely agree. We need to quickly move to prairie grass and cellulosic ethanol.
     
  6. Grizzled

    Grizzled Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2000
    Messages:
    2,756
    Likes Received:
    40
    There are problems with cellulosic ethanol too, but not as many as this guy suggests, imo.
    http://i-r-squared.blogspot.com/2006/11/cellulosic-ethanol-reality-check.html

    I think that there is not one solution on the horizon at the moment but several that can be used where they most make sense. There’s no reason that I know of why fuel stations couldn’t sell both biodiesel and an ethanol blend, for example. And we could perhaps replace the commuter car class with electric cars that could be plugged in both at work and at home to charge over a period of time. Fuel efficiency can be increased on larger combustion engine vehicles. Fuel cells could perhaps be used in some applications, perhaps on some fleet vehicles that operate in a city and therefore would be relatively close to a fuel source, and parts and mechanics that can work with them. It would be nice if there was a silver bullet solution, but in the absence of that I think we have several solutions that are very nearly ready for widespread use that together could provide a good solution.
     

Share This Page