Another Olbermann defecation thread

Creepyfloyd?

 

You seem to be obsessed with Keith ever since he completely and rightfully slammed Bill O'Reilly for his slander of WWII soldiers who were victims of war crimes.

The funny thing is that you seem especially obsessed with telivision ratings. Those don't really matter toward substance at all, and doesn't really prove anything one way or the other.

Of course Keith's ratings are in an upswing and Bill's are in a down swing, but who cares?

I have no problem at saying that Keith shouldn't have told someone to kill themselves. But at the same time I don't have too much sympathy for people who try and bait him, and accuse him of having Al Zarqawi for a hero.

I had no idea you were so protective of Bill O'Reilly. It doesn't matter though, because Keith will continuosly best him in substantive points, honesty, integrity and support of the soldiers. Bill will probably always best Keith in matters of self promotion, being a blowhard, and having a less informed audience.

 

Someone wake me up when Olbermann make sh*t up, then doesn't retract it or apologize, and finally when he is successfully sued for sexual harassment.

 

dude you can rape women when you have good ratings.

why is there another thread on the same subject?

 

*Yawn*

gwayneco, yet another sensless article posted from with no point.

You realize we all have access to the Internet and can read for ourselves? We don't need you to repost the entire Internet in D&D.

If you want to debate something, then try making a point rather than simply posting articles.

 

gwayne, please get a blog and keep it in your signature so you can stop cluttering up the D&D with links to articles about stuff that only you care about.

 

Hum....

Sounds familiar

 

This is not the "Mull Over and Share" forum. This is the "Debate & Discussion" forum.

If I post an article in D&D about what Britney Spears said about Bush, will you finally respect me as being "informed?" Pretty Please?

 

I don't call printing a story about Keith putting O'Reilly in his place lionization.

 

I'm just trying to help you out. Most of your threads are aimless as evidenced by all the other responses here. The articles you post are fine ...if you would offer a take to start the discussion.

btw, I read most threads. What makes this BBS better than average is most posters know the "rules." You are the only poster right now with the MO of posting an article with no questions/comments. If everybody had your MO, this BBS would suck. Not saying you suck but your recent trend contributes little to D&D.

What makes it worse is you open brand new threads to cover basically the same topic. How many Olbermann threads have you started now?

 

I have got to agree with gwayneco here. There is room for all kinds of posts and posters here. If there are not enough people to supprt a thread it will die a quick death and fall into page 2 obscurity. If gwayneco's threads draw enough interest to keep them from doing so, then there are obviously people interested in posting in them, so he should continue putting them out there. Either way, there is no reason that he needs to change his posting style.

 

Whats the thing in the O'reilly lover's hand?

 

We could just make one thread a sticky and call it the official thread for all of gwayenco's informative posts.

 

"Dummy's Guide to Settle Sexual Harassment Lawsuit."

 

Oh okay... I thought it was "The Falafel and You :How to Romance Women with Fried Food Innuendo ."