1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Al Qaeda had planned 2003 cyanide attacks

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Sishir Chang, Jun 17, 2006.

  1. Sishir Chang

    Sishir Chang Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2000
    Messages:
    11,064
    Likes Received:
    8
    This article is pretty amazing and seems like something out of 24. If this is true we may have dodged a major terrorist attack by Al Qaeda in 2003 but it also is troubling that the cell that was supposed to carry out that attack might still be at large.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13385543/site/newsweek/

    Too Close for Comfort
    An Al Qaeda cell had planned a 2003 cyanide attack on the New York subway system, a new book reports

    Web Exclusive
    By Mark Hosenball
    Newsweek
    Updated: 2:17 p.m. CT June 17, 2006
    June 17, 2006 - U.S. authorities had intelligence that a team of Al Qaeda-linked terrorists had infiltrated the United States and planned a 2003 attack on the New York City subway system with homemade cyanide bombs, federal and local counter-terrorism officials have acknowledged to NEWSWEEK. But the officials say the plot was called off at the last minute by Al Qaeda’s Ayman al-Zawahiri-for reasons that remain unclear.

    Because of its length I'm only posting the first part of the article here.
     
  2. tigermission1

    tigermission1 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2002
    Messages:
    15,557
    Likes Received:
    17
    I don't know, I am somewhat skeptical of that claim, I don't think Al-Zawahiri had much operational control, especially over an Al-Qaeda cell in NYC. Most agree that Al-Qaeda is very decentralized and for the most part operates through independent 'terror cells' that pledge their allegiance to the ideology of Al-Qaeda.

    Of course, it could be true, but seems somewhat 'vague' and unlikely.
     

Share This Page