1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

7 games left, "no TANKING" but do you want them to win or loose?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by barbourdg, Apr 9, 2002.

?

7 games left, "no TANKING" but do you want them to win or loose?

  1. Win on principle, and take whatever we get in the Draft?

    12 vote(s)
    20.3%
  2. Loose and possible end up with another Franchise Player?

    47 vote(s)
    79.7%
  1. barbourdg

    barbourdg Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2000
    Messages:
    1,271
    Likes Received:
    1
    7 games left, "no TANKING" but do you want them to win or loose?

    Forget about Pride & Respect. Those qualities were lost weeks ago, when the Rockets starting playing like CBA players. Getting blown out by the freaking Bulls & Grizzlies. We are now talking about 7 games, that could determine the Rockets future.

    We are talking about Yao Ming versus Chris Marcus!! How about Qyntel Woods versus Jared Jeffries!!!

    How about this thought, we get #2 (Ming is gone), and we trade our pick (and ?) to the Clippers for Odom and the #8 pick (from Atlanta). We draft Caron Butler and pick up the best center left with #14 (toronto). Perhaps even Chris Marcus. We come out of the draft with ODOM, BUTLER & MARCUS. That would be one hell of a DRAFT!!

    You are telling me that one game does not count? I do not want the Rockets to tank, but winning a couple of games in the final 7 games is not going to make a difference next year. Another FRANCHISE player will.
     
  2. DiSeAsEd MoNkEy

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2001
    Messages:
    1,587
    Likes Received:
    1
    hoping your team will lose is VERY sad.
     
  3. BigSexy

    BigSexy Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 1999
    Messages:
    315
    Likes Received:
    31
    i totally agree that houston should focus on developing the role players. some people may call this tanking but i think that if the role players end the season with confidence, then i think that next season along with a good draft would definitely improve houston overall. there is no point playing francis and mobley 40+ mins when they may get inured. let the young inexperienced guys run around and get used to playing more. we would still play teams who are headed for playoffs and still jockeying for position so still talented teams remainin to play against.
    this is not hoping your team will lose rather developing your role players
     
  4. saleem

    saleem Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2001
    Messages:
    30,317
    Likes Received:
    14,752
    Barbourdg,Why would you want to pick up 2 SF's in Odom and Butler?
     
  5. WinkFan

    WinkFan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2002
    Messages:
    3,987
    Likes Received:
    96
    How do you gain confindence getting you a$$ handed to you?
     
  6. barbourdg

    barbourdg Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2000
    Messages:
    1,271
    Likes Received:
    1
    The 3 & 5 are the Rockets biggest hole. They have to be addressed this summer (via draft or trade). Our current SF's do not get it done: Walt Williams is streaky (contract ends, and I doubt the Rockets will offer more than a cheap veterans deal), Dan Langhi is a big question mark (I think he will run at the nearest exit to find a team that passes the ball), TM has some decent inside moves & defense, but his outside shooting is aweful. He is still a floater between the 3 & 4 spot.

    Odom would hopefully come in and start controlling the ball movement, and open things up for everybody else. Odom would hopefully replace MOOCHIE in Rudys favorite 3 guard line-up. Odom can play all 3 positions, but unlinke Moochie can RUN A FAST BREAK and PASS THE BALL. Butler is already considered NBA ready, and could be a future Paul Pierce (thats to good to pass up on). Besides Odom might demand 10 million next summer as well and we need a backup.

    As for Center, Collier still looks like a slug out there and we would be lucky to get a 2nd rounder for him. If Cato could catch a basketball he would look great as a FUTURE backup Center. Problem is that he looked 100X worse coming of the bench, then starting last season. Kind of like Griffin, he was dominating as our PF starter, but since KT came back (averaging 40+ minutes a game), he has regressed. I have not seen enough of Chris Marcus, but he is suppose to be great on the boards (where cato has problems with his butterfinger hands). I REALLY HOPE THAT GRIFFIN ADDS ABOUT 20-30 POUNDS THIS SUMMER. He could be a star Center in this league with a few more inches.

    #1 choice would be Yang, then Woods who seems to be a lock at being a future STAR. I think the Clippers will move Odom on draft day. Sterling can get more for Odom this summer, then next (when he is desparate to move him - see Scottie Pippen trade). Only thing throwing a knife in Sterling plans is Elton Brand. You know he wants to max him out, and you know that Brand will not sign anything until he sees what Sterling is going to do with everybody else.
     
  7. NJRocket

    NJRocket Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2001
    Messages:
    7,242
    Likes Received:
    27
    LOSE LOSE LOSE...let cleveland and NY win and see how far it gets them next year
     
  8. ROXTXIA

    ROXTXIA Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    20,929
    Likes Received:
    13,074
    Odom is about to undergo surgery on his wrist. Makes sense. Surgery now gives him recovery time to see if teams will still try to trade for him. But I'd want to know he's OK before we hand over valuable draft picks &/or KT. If healthy, Odom is entirely welcome here.

    Unfortunately our more pressing need is at the center position. Yes, opposing 3's torch us, absolutely kill us, but we need to fill the 5-spot. If Wilcox is at least 230 lbs. (the draft sources invariably list 220 or 240) then give him a serious look. If not, trade for Kwame Brown. Maybe CD and Rudy can bring out the future All-Star in this kid.
     
  9. Desert Scar

    Desert Scar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2000
    Messages:
    8,764
    Likes Received:
    11
    With the Rapters amazing run and the Cavs recent play it looks to be quite a magical ending to a lousy and unlucky season, let's not blow it now.

    Confidence and team unity are overrated, athleticsm, size and talent are underrated. Aw, what the heck, let's go for the Nugget's pick! With a good effort tonight, at home versus Memphis and especially at the Nugs, it might just be possible. After all, who would have thought the Raptors could be two wins away from essential securing a playoff spot 2-3 weeks ago?

    Personally, I trully don't believe we are tanking, we just aren't very good, have played no defense all year, and have no veteran leadership right now. I just hope we wait to start clicking next year. I feel greedy:D , lets go get the 4th spot going into the lottery!
     
  10. edc

    edc Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    3,129
    Likes Received:
    42
    I'd like them to end up with 30 wins. That means 3-3 over the final six.
     
  11. NJRocket

    NJRocket Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2001
    Messages:
    7,242
    Likes Received:
    27
    Is there some sort of prize for 30 wins that i'm unaware of?? What the hell is the difference if we winn 30 or 29 or 31????:rolleyes: Thats the most ridiculous thing Ive ever heard.
     
  12. TheFreak

    TheFreak Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 1999
    Messages:
    18,305
    Likes Received:
    3,317
    That's a naive and uninformed exaggeration.

    I'll never understand how fans of a team that has grabbed possibly the best player in 2 of the past 3 drafts despite winning over 50 percent of their games in that span continue to think this way. Boggles the mind.
     
  13. edc

    edc Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    3,129
    Likes Received:
    42
    My reasoning is simple. The 1983-84 club went 29-53.

    Excluding the ridiculously poor (ie: genuinely tanking or expansion) seasons, I'd like that record for badness to stand.
     
  14. BuckeyeRocketFan

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2000
    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    18
    Just for curiousity's sake, what do you need Butler for if you trade for Odom? Don't you then have a lineup of Marcus, Griffin, Odom, Mobley and Francis? Butler doesn't fit anywhere. I think in your scenario, if we trade for Odom and a pick, we take Borchart rather than Marcus, or we take them both, or we trade one of the picks again. I think Butler goes elsewhere because he and Odom play the same position.
     
  15. PhiSlammaJamma

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 1999
    Messages:
    29,969
    Likes Received:
    8,053
    The Lottery eliminates any reason to root for losing.
     
  16. barbourdg

    barbourdg Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2000
    Messages:
    1,271
    Likes Received:
    1
    No disrespect Freak, but who cares if we possibly got the best players in 2 of the past 3 drafts. The past is the past, and after this season the draft is all we have to look forward to.
     
  17. Clutch

    Clutch Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 1999
    Messages:
    22,950
    Likes Received:
    33,698
    We already got Ralph Sampson. What do we need Akeem Olajuwon for?
     
  18. barbourdg

    barbourdg Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2000
    Messages:
    1,271
    Likes Received:
    1
    Buckeye, we still need a backup SF. Walt will probably move on for more money (Rockets wont offer more than vet. min.), Langhi will move to get away from Rudys bench, TM has great inside skills, but is not a threat from the outside (he is a good floater from 3-4). Butler would bring some outside shooting, that Odom does not offer. Odom is needed to run our offense, and hopefully Rudy sees the impovements and ditches the 3 guard (Moochie) ISO's.

    Borchart would be fine, I think we need to take the best center available at #14, but not both. That would give us two rookie Centers, Griffin (possibly our future center) & Cato. Collier will be gone, or will spend the season on IR (with Rice).
     
  19. TheFreak

    TheFreak Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 1999
    Messages:
    18,305
    Likes Received:
    3,317
    Well hell, since it worked in 1984, it must work every year.

    How many teams since Houston in '84 (the lottery started the following year) picked a player with the #1 pick that eventually led them to a championship? Okay, I'll move it out to the top 3 picks so you can include Jordan. Okay, I'll move it out to the top 10 picks. You're left with Chicago and San Antonio. Two teams in the last 17 years. But what about the Pippens and Grants that were picked in that range, some will say. The answer is those guys are irrelevant unless you have a Jordan. Therefore the focus should be to find a player on our current team and make him a Jordan (ie give Francis plenty of minutes and try to win games); or rely on luck, which, again, 2 in 17 years -- and that's assuming a) we pick at the top, and b) there's a player of that caliber in the draft THIS year. You have to compute your chances to win the lottery, AND weigh that against the probability of a Jordan, Shaq, or Hakeem being available RIGHT NOW. I'm no mathematician, but I'd say the chances of that are ridiculously low.

    By playing all out to win games, you presumably have seen Francis improve, AND kept your dignity, AND fostered a winning environment/attitude. You then most likely make a move in the off-season to improve your personnel (an example would be the Francis and Griffin acquisitions, or the Taylor free agent signing). By tanking (perhaps by unnecessarily resting Francis, Mobley, etc, and wasting chances for them to improve their games), you most likely, best case scenario, add another future role player to a team that will probably never achieve greatness (or make the same or a similar deal that you would have made before). Bottom line is, If I'm not going to win a championship, I'd rather do it by not tanking.
     
  20. Desert Scar

    Desert Scar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2000
    Messages:
    8,764
    Likes Received:
    11
    71% thinking with their brains
    29% thinking with their hearts

    Good thing me and most of us don't have a heart:D
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now