Personally, I see no difference between Hillary and Obama, as far as effecting me. Where do the Dems on this board stand? Would you rather have Hillary? http://www.wtop.com/?nid=213&sid=2099680
Hillary gets a six-figure salary to travel the world and visit heads of state. She's the only person in the entire cabinet that doesn't have to worry about health-care, budget deficits, or, with any real accountability, Iraq or Afghanistan (we don't spend half a trillion each year on laser-guided treaties). To think that she would give all of it up to elect Sarah Palin and answer 15 year old questions about the Rose Law firm and Vince Foster is idiotic.
She strikes me as power hungry. If she wanted a hedonistic/easy life-style why would she have run for president in the first place? I just don't know how jaded she is about what happened last time she ran.
You mean many democrats don't want an arrogant bully who cannot work with the other side of the aisle to save his life as their candidate in 2012? Color me shocked.
its 2010. I think at one point 80% of Americans actually bought into the joke that the UN was wrong and Sadaam had WMDs.
I voted for Obama, and although I don't think he done a bad job, I don't think he has done a great job either. He has not inspired people people as the president like he did as a candidate. I thought Hillary would have been a better president and I still do.
Nobody on Earth could work with the "other side" when they're determined not to work with you no matter what. The Republican do nothing Congress of Bush's tenure has morphed into the Republican stop all progress contingent of Obama's tenure. Republicans aren't interested in working with anyone on anything, they've made that clear since the election and you want to blame Obama for that? The stupidity continues...
The shame is that this guy would probably actually stand up for his ideals if he was in office... and that's precisely why he'll never get the party nomination.
Its easy to inspire people as a candidate...extremely difficult to do so as a President. the Oval Office is a tough, tough job.
His people are in dark age. They will probably do the same thing if given the chance. Those people deserve saddam.
Yes prior to the Bush Jr's claim that he had them that was true. By the time Bush Jr. was making the claim it was no longer correct.
Yes, and in 1982, Ronald Reagan's popularity was WORSE than Obama's. Anyone who thinks what is going on now is going to affect the 2012 election has a true lack of understanding regarding the history of elections and such. If anything, whatever happens between January and November of 2012 is going to have the only effect on the election. Don't believe me? Ask George Bush how he went from the highest approval rating in our history in 1991 to losing an election 9-10 months later.
Gee whiz, there used to be this poster... what was his name?... he was really interested in starting mess about Hillary and Obama in an "internecine" battle that would destroy the democratic ticket... He was called Mojo_Jorge or something like that. It was a long time ago -- I forget.
