3 years later rank the line up

Those are all good lineups but won't be together like that in 3 years.

 

Do you mean, order the list according to the franchises' prospects in the next three years, or according to the aggregate talent of those lineups?

If it's the first (franchise prospects), it would be:

1) Portland

2) Everyone else, because none of the other organizations listed care about winning and are happy with an internet fan base salivating over "cap space" and picks. Fifteen-year-old fantasy nerds apparently think the point of basketball is stockpiling first-round draft pick. (And no, New Jersey/Brooklyn is not getting Lebron).

If it's the second--that's just impossible to do. There are some obvious lemons in those lineups (Yi?) and obvious franchise players, but evaluating all of those players' potential before Griffin, Harden, Curry, etc. play their first game is ridiculous.

 

Never seen this many misspelling names.
You ever watched those teams play?

 

im a durant fan. so ill just go with okc

 

Nonetheless, my vote goes to POR.
They're already a contender with Aldridge & Roy.
Other teams still need a decent inside force.

 

Awesome

 

I'd say OKC, GSW, and POR are definitely above the rest of the field.

 

Gordan, Thordan and Jordan would be an awesome trio

 

Portland, though Oden has to step up his game

 

"Don't forget me!"

 

I like what Presti has been doing with OKC. They desperately need some veterans to help the squad develop but if they keep this team together for the next 3 years, they can be a very very tough team.

 

That's what DM needs to do as well.

 

Portland, followed by OKC.

 

Hou: J. Wall, Taylor, C-bud, Bosh, Yao