1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

In retrospect: Should we have taken Parsons' option?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by HardLin, Jul 10, 2014.

?

Should we have taken Parsons' option?

Poll closed Jul 17, 2014.
  1. Yes

    116 vote(s)
    53.7%
  2. No

    100 vote(s)
    46.3%
  1. James88

    James88 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2013
    Messages:
    328
    Likes Received:
    12
    The fact that this poll is actually 53 votes vs 53 votes right now, is evidence that democracy is doomed to fail.

    Really?! Really?!
     
  2. SeekingAlpha

    SeekingAlpha Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    708
    Likes Received:
    129
    Cuban's made a few desperate "win-now" moves this off-season. Re-acquiring Tyson Chandler, going after CP. It's all to show Dirk his appreciation for coming back at a reduced price and demonstrating his commitment to winning before Dirk retires.

    The Mavs blind-sided the Spurs this past playoffs and pushed them the furthest to elimination, plus they already have a solid coaching staff in place. Everyone's been talking about OKC, Clips, Spurs, and GS that Dallas has been flying under the radar.

    Cuban's doing the smart thing. He realizes he's not getting LeBron / Bosh / Melo and is going straight to the next best thing while all the other teams are fighting for a piece of the pie.
     
  3. Blake

    Blake Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2003
    Messages:
    9,869
    Likes Received:
    2,830
    I will answer in 72 hours
     
  4. torocan

    torocan Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2012
    Messages:
    4,228
    Likes Received:
    436
    Cuban is doing the best he can with what's available.

    Dirk isn't getting any younger and his window is closing fast, so Cuban is going all out to get him as much help as he can for one last championship run. He struck out on Melo, Lebron and will probably miss on Bosh so the alternative is make the strongest play for Parsons/similar player or go back to Dirk and tell him that he took a $10M pay cut for nothing.

    The contract is constructed in a way to make it as hard as possible for the Rockets to match, which should be the goal if you're truly going after a RFA. And because Dirk is on a timer, they're going all in on the short term so paying a premium to ensure they get their target is minor compared to the cost of wasting an entire season of payroll in NBA purgatory.

    I'm sure for Cuban that getting to screw Morey is just a bonus. A bonus he's fully enjoying, but just a bonus nonetheless.
     
  5. sutton

    sutton Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2014
    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    15
    I bet some ppl don't understand what "deline Parson's option" means, should make it pay 1M or risk 46M, then ppl will vote it right like a informed citizen.:p
     
  6. slothy420

    slothy420 Paper Street Soap Co.

    Joined:
    May 10, 2002
    Messages:
    1,121
    Likes Received:
    464
    Yeah, but who's to say that either of those guys would WANT to play in Houston; aside from DH, its not like FA's are flocking to come play for Houston. I must have been delusional thinking that once we got our two superstars that Houston would be the top destination for any and all ring chasers.

    Even if Morey could get one of those other guys to sign, how do we know that its not going to cost close to what CP and GH are signing for? Since everyone was gearing up to chase LBJ, there are several teams that have cap room to sign a FA which, from the way things are tuning out, they are going to use to overpay one of the tier 'B' wings considering how overinflated the market is for those guys right now.

    I worry that its going to play out like the Dragic/Lin situation did where Houston ended up paying a lesser player practically the same as the guy they let walk.
     
  7. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost not wrong
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    47,397
    Likes Received:
    16,949
    If Tyson and Parsons are their big FA moves, then Dirk might as well retire, cause that window be closed.
     
  8. torocan

    torocan Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2012
    Messages:
    4,228
    Likes Received:
    436
    It's not ideal but who else was out there for them to get? 30 teams in the NBA, there's only 1 winner in every trade/signing.
     
  9. Koperboy

    Koperboy Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,682
    Likes Received:
    810
    I'm 100% sure he didn't overlook that possibility. He and his team is smart enough to predict all such outcomes. The problem is he took the gamble and failed. I don't know why he didn't take that handshake agreement from Parsons:

    "CP, are you sure you won't sign any offer until we land a 3rd superstar?"
    "Sir yes sir"

    It's entirely possible they did make that agreement, but then why did DM lowball Parsons?
     
  10. meh

    meh Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    15,368
    Likes Received:
    2,242
    I still maintain by my original reaction to the news that this was a quid pro quo stemming from us dealing with Dan Fegan and Dwight Howard. And Cuban, a known friend of Fegan and the reason why Dwight even went to Dallas last year, being the guy to offer Parsons this type of contract was also predicted by me.

    http://rafer.clutchfans.net/showpost.php?p=9055330&postcount=78

    In the end it's the price of Dwight Howard. If this means we pay Parsons an extra $15mil than he's worth, then it's more than worth it because Dwight is a superstar.
     
  11. Tdugs710

    Tdugs710 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Messages:
    284
    Likes Received:
    26
    Have you looked at the state of America? Democracy has failed in respect to politicians actually doing their jobs.
     
  12. Tdugs710

    Tdugs710 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Messages:
    284
    Likes Received:
    26
    I think it was a good gamble to decline and try to resign him at like 10mil a year, but f**king Gordon Hayward and his deal screwed us (in terms of market value).
     
  13. duluth111222

    duluth111222 I.D.I.O.T

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,330
    Likes Received:
    3,079
    Why do people keep saying this nonsense? Yes, it's Les' money, not ours. But it's still NOT free money.

    1. We don't know if Les is REALLY willing to pay Lux tax
    2. Even if he is, we don't know how much he's willing to pay
    3. Most rich men didn't get rich for no reason. They cherish every penny...
     
  14. REEKO_HTOWN

    REEKO_HTOWN I'm Rich Biiiiaaatch!

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    46,812
    Likes Received:
    18,519
    Chandler is a grade A THOT
     
  15. sutton

    sutton Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2014
    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    15
    Plus Fegan had a history with Mchale, who treated Parson like a second son.
     
  16. juicystream

    juicystream Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2001
    Messages:
    29,285
    Likes Received:
    5,399
    No:

    1) He would have counted less against the cap going into FA this year
    2) Team could have traded him
    3) They could have offered him a max extension if they were willing to pay him that much that wouldn't kick in until next season.

    Morey figured he could beat down Chandler's price by being restricted, but there were just too many teams with cap space compared to too few legit max players.
     
  17. emjohn

    emjohn Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2002
    Messages:
    12,132
    Likes Received:
    567
    Hayward's contract had stone cold zero bearing on Parsons. Cuban (or anyone else) was not going to give him an offer sheet that Morey would be excited to match. "Fair value" would have done the Rockets a solid and Cuban no good. It's just like our "poison pill" deals we used to snag Lin and Asik. You come up with as nasty a contract as you can to dissuade the team holding the rights. Overvalue money, player option, trade kicker. Anything you can think of to make Morey cringe.

    Morey had to weigh the risk of letting Parsons be unrestricted next year. He took the gamble that retaining a right to match would give him more control. Parsons was playing for pennies the last several years with Morey telling him it's a business. Parsons had no moral obligation to give a discount now.

    Let's see this play out though.
     
  18. Panda23

    Panda23 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2012
    Messages:
    8,566
    Likes Received:
    619
  19. Panda23

    Panda23 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2012
    Messages:
    8,566
    Likes Received:
    619
    Because he doesn't think Parsons is a 15M a year player???
     
  20. davidxhz

    davidxhz Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2008
    Messages:
    1,846
    Likes Received:
    308
    i think it's all good because we are clearly underpaying parsons, it's a move that shows class about this organization, besides lin is getting about 8.5 m a year, don't tell me parsons is not twice as good as lin.....
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now