1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Lies, damned lies, and statistics

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by arno_ed, May 28, 2014.

Tags:
  1. arno_ed

    arno_ed Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    8,023
    Likes Received:
    2,128
    I always love/hate how people do not understand numbers and statistics, Or know them but use them wrongly to get a point across.

    One of the beste example is Fox new with this graph
    [​IMG]

    They clearly tried to get a messag acres, hence the not showing numbers on the Y axis, and not letting the Y axis going to zero.

    I found a interesting website with interesting correlations:
    http://www.tylervigen.com/

    For example:
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Which one do you all like?
     
    #1 arno_ed, May 28, 2014
    Last edited: May 28, 2014
  2. Panda23

    Panda23 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2012
    Messages:
    8,566
    Likes Received:
    620
    nicholas cage lmao
     
  3. brantonli24

    brantonli24 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    3,236
    Likes Received:
    68
    I recently got into an argument with a Cavs fan who thought that the Cavs own pick for the 2011 draft shouldn't count towards the total probability of the Cavs winning the lottery (they won it with the Clips pick). Also, apparently this is an interesting anomaly in how people perceive stats:

    Say you are walking through the woods, and you come cross a campsite that has been heavily damaged, tents ripped apart etc. A park ranger is there, and he asks you:

    What do you think are the chances a wild bear did this?

    (give a guess first).
    then he also asks
    What do you think are the chances a wild animal did this?
    (give a guess too)

    The anomaly:

    What experiments find is that people often give a higher probability to the 1st question (bear) than to the 2nd one (wild animal), because they mistake similarity with probability. However, wild bears are a subset of wild animals, and therefore the probability of a wild bear must be less than or equal to the probability of any wild animal causing the damage. of course these questions should be asked independently and to different people, so it probably won't work on a forum
     
  4. arno_ed

    arno_ed Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    8,023
    Likes Received:
    2,128
    This reminds me of a joke in the daily show:
    The chance that the Nern centre will destroy the world is 50%. There are only 2 options, either it destroys the world or it doesn't destroy the world, so 50%.
     
  5. Xerobull

    Xerobull ...and I'm all out of bubblegum
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2003
    Messages:
    36,769
    Likes Received:
    35,609
    Chance that old white men hate Obama = 100%.

    [​IMG]
     
  6. Nero

    Nero Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    6,447
    Likes Received:
    1,429
    I guess the question is really this: is missing your minimum target by over a million people a big thing or a little thing?
     
  7. arno_ed

    arno_ed Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    8,023
    Likes Received:
    2,128
    No it isn't. This thread is not about Obamacare or fox news it is about statistics and numbers. This was just a very funny way of wrongly a graph to try and make a point.

    I would prefer you stayed on topic. I do not want this thread to end up in de D&D
     

Share This Page