1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Clips and Celts must convince the NBA that Doc and KG are not packaged

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by Carl Herrera, Jun 19, 2013.

  1. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,575
    Alright... now this makes some sense. Doc goes to LAC for some draft consideration should be kosher. Then BOS can do whatever it wants with KG and Pierce. It may well make sense for BOS to send KG to LAC given that KG has a no-trade clause.

    One risk for the LAC's part is whether the league would later deny a transaction that gets KG to LA if the league later on believes that this was a part of a planned package. It also opens room for another team to pursue KG.
     
  2. heypartner

    heypartner Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 1999
    Messages:
    63,511
    Likes Received:
    59,008
    ?? can't tell if you are serious.

    This isn't allowed. You can't trade a coach for any player assets.

    The way I read it is LAC's primary target is Rivers, and they hope BOS will release him --but, they can't entice them with any player assets.. After that, they pray/"roll dice" that the league will somehow allow a separate, future trade for KG/PP despite Stern clearly stating he wouldn't.
     
  3. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,920
    Likes Received:
    39,925
    It's just...of course it's still part of a package trade. If the league REALLY wants to enforce and set an example, then heypartner (think it was him) is right. They have to flat out say "under no circumstances will we let Garnett and Doc to both end up in LA."
     
  4. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,920
    Likes Received:
    39,925
    Miami let SVG go coach ORL in exchange for draft considerations?
     
  5. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,575
    How did Stand Van Gundy get out of his MIA contract to coach ORL, then?

    You can compensate a team with draft picks for releasing a coach, which is what Orlando did to get SVG. You just cannot include any players (as opposed to draft picks) in the transaction involving a head coach.
     
  6. ASTROCKETEXANS

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    7
    Can we trade McHale to Boston for Rivers? Then we can get Paul. Or
    If they want to give us Rivers and Rondo for McHale and Lin we would take it.
     
  7. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,920
    Likes Received:
    39,925
    It depends.

    According to WOJ, the Rockets don't want to lose McHale. According to CyberX, the Rockets don't like McHale.
     
  8. heypartner

    heypartner Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 1999
    Messages:
    63,511
    Likes Received:
    59,008
    The article you were quoting (J.R.'s last link) did not mention draft consideration. It only mentioned monetary compensation to help Boston pay the guaranteed portion of River's salary. Teams and coaches can certainly negotiate contract buy-outs where one team pays some of the coach's salary.

    Regardless, Stern pretty much said that retooling the deal won't change anything. The article merely says that LAC wants Rivers primarily, and hope in the future to change Stern's mind about KG/PP...which likely won't happen.
     
  9. Ziggy

    Ziggy QUEEN ANON

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    37,279
    Likes Received:
    13,740
    But who does Dwight like?
     
  10. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,920
    Likes Received:
    39,925
    Orlando sent draft picks for the rights to SVG. Are you saying that is illegal?
     
  11. RocketFan

    RocketFan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,309
    Likes Received:
    74
    LOL... It would be funny if Chris Paul got sick of this drama and told LAC/Sterling... "Just trade me to Houston... At least I won't have to deal hearing about this everyday... Whether you tried to improve the team or not, you went about it the wrong way, messing with CBA rules that were agreed upon not that long ago."
     
  12. Awesome

    Awesome Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    1,131
    Likes Received:
    24
    Everybody depending on the day
     
  13. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,575
    And the possible denial of a Garnett deal later is the risk that LAC and BOS will have to take. Whenever that Garnett proposal is submitted to the NBA, the NBA will need to decide whether this is really a separate deal or simply a part of an earlier agreed-upon Doc-KG packaged deal.

    The timing of the Garnett deal may well be important to how the league views it. If the deal is submitted 2 days after the Doc deal happens, it is likely to be viewed as linked. If the deal is being submitted in, say, October 2013, after both teams have made a bunch of other roster moves and the circumstances and incentives for the whole league have changed, it would be more reasonable for the NBA to say that BOS and LAC have made a separate decision on a new trade.
     
  14. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    60,017
    Likes Received:
    133,298
    Can you not read? Are you deaf?
     
  15. J.R.

    J.R. Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    114,379
    Likes Received:
    177,375
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Clippers haven't offered Boston a first-round draft pick for rights to Doc Rivers, sources tell Y! Discussions are nowhere until they do.</p>&mdash; Adrian Wojnarowski (@WojYahooNBA) <a href="https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/statuses/347820385053581312">June 20, 2013</a></blockquote>
    <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
     
  16. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,683
    Likes Received:
    16,209
    You can't trade a coach, but you can offer a team compensation to release him, from what I understand. The key is that he's a free agent, so he could screw you over and sign with someone else. Easy to say that will never happen, but remember what Carlos Boozer did with Cleveland (?). So the proposed idea seems to be:

    * Clips pay Celtics to release Doc Rivers
    * Doc signs as a free agent coach with Clips: Doc under no obligation to sign with Clips
    * A few weeks later, Clips offer trade for KG: Boston under no obligation to accept

    This, theoretically, separates the transactions such that there is no guarantee any piece follows the previous piece. In other words, they aren't contingent on each other.

    If the Celtics back out, from a practical standpoint, KG can just throw a fit and say he won't play for the Celtics and won't waive his no-trade for anyone but the Clippers.

    The real question is just whether the league would relent or not. They'd be perfectly justified in saying "hell no", but I suspect they back down. The last thing the leagues wants to do is interfere in transactions if they can avoid it.
     
  17. OTMax

    OTMax Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2013
    Messages:
    8,352
    Likes Received:
    3,670
    How in the world are they allowed to sign Rivers anyway? Stern is very stern, no pun intended, in the interview about not letting this slide because they know it was one deal and they are not trying to break it up into 2 separate deals. Trying to sign one first is exactly what Stern says he will stop so me thinks this cannot happen unless they do not pursue KG at all.
     
    1 person likes this.
  18. J.R.

    J.R. Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    114,379
    Likes Received:
    177,375
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Clippers want to set aside Garnett deal for now, but are showing no willingess to offer Celtics a draft pick for Doc Rivers, sources tell Y!</p>&mdash; Adrian Wojnarowski (@WojYahooNBA) <a href="https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/statuses/347821164145557504">June 20, 2013</a></blockquote>
    <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
     
  19. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,575
    So, if the Clipers were willing to offer two 1st rounders (or at least one) for Doc Rivers when he and KG were "packaged," but is unwilling to offer a 1st rounder for him in a separate transaction, it makes it even more clear that the two deals were contingent upon each other.
     
  20. J.R.

    J.R. Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    114,379
    Likes Received:
    177,375
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Don't see Danny Ainge giving up Doc for a late first-rounder in a shaky draft, doesn't help <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23celtics&amp;src=hash">#celtics</a> rebuild that much, if at all</p>&mdash; gary washburn (@GwashNBAGlobe) <a href="https://twitter.com/GwashNBAGlobe/statuses/347821913973858304">June 20, 2013</a></blockquote>
    <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23celtics&amp;src=hash">#celtics</a> want 1) salary cap relief, 2) younger players, 3) draft picks. Ainge does not like this draft.</p>&mdash; gary washburn (@GwashNBAGlobe) <a href="https://twitter.com/GwashNBAGlobe/statuses/347822365633310720">June 20, 2013</a></blockquote>
    <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
     

Share This Page