This is a major fallacy floating around here. It is very possible to be a Rocket's fan and think that they deserve a better coach who will lead them better and it has nothing to do with Lin (i.e..bad substitutions, not enough "variance" in offensive sets, etc.). But when stuff gets repeated enough you get this: If you critize McHale, well you must be a "LOF". If I don't defend McHale, I am supporting Lin. People life isn't this simple nor are all situations based off of some either-or fallacy. If you are critical of McHale it doesn't automatically mean you're some Lin fanatic.
