ok dude, its just a game, put the controller down. ok ok Kobe is better. You win, Kobe > Jordan we are all very sorry k
The only reason people believe kobe is better is because his "clutch" is flashier. Kobe can hit very tough 3 pointers when he's on fire and everyone remembers those amazing shots. He's lost a lot of games that way too by jacking up shots. Jordan's low post game is what set's it apart for me. He operated perfectly in the post. Hitting fadeaways, facing up and driving, or passing out to open shooters. You don't see Jordan jacking up much of those low percentage 3's. Why? Because his bread and butter was his post game and also another reason why he was so successful without a legit big man. Here's a thought. In what's possibly the most effective scheme, Phil Jackson's triangle offense, who do you want posting up? Jordan or Kobe?
The ways of the kobetard are ****ing dumb.... <iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/HMv44Xrnu3s?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Kobes pretty good but not that good. He might end up top 20-15 players all time when he done playin..
They have a starting lineup made up entirely of current and former all-stars and three former MVPs, they're desperately fighting to make the playoffs, yet it took unworldly heroics from Kobe to beat the Raptors at home. Hilarious.
I simply don't see how you can look at his resume and say that he only "might" end up in the Top 20. He's EASILY Top 20 and most likely will be right around the 8-12 range when it's all said and done.
It was?? Read it again: ooooohh, so you don't hate the Lakers, just Kobe. Gotcha. My bad, then you're definitely not biased in a Kobe vs MJ argument...
