How good would we be if we had Lebron instead of Harden?

You know if Saint Paul the Apostle was on this team even as a assistant coach, I am sure we'd make it to the Western Conference round.

 

James took the Cavs to the finals. If he had this team, which IMO is arguably way better than that finals team of his, Houston will see the finals again.

 

Not one, not two, not three... but seven... around seven people added you to their ignore list.

 

I don't know why we need these threads...

"...Paul instead of Lin?"
"...Durant instead of Parsons?"
"...Nowitzki instead of Motiejunas?"
"...Howard instead of Asik?"

...when these threads are soooooooo much better.

 

Any team with Lebron is instantly a championship contender.

Did you see that Cleveland team.... This team is WAY better and Lebron is much evolved from Cleveland Lebron.

This is a moronic question.

Harden is a top 10 player right now (I can't think of 10 guys I'd rather build around than him), but Lebron is #1 by a large margin (yes even over KD).

 

LeBron is so f***ing wicked good right now that he could probably turn even the Bobcats into title contenders. He's playing out of his mind. His skills have reached nearly the same high level as his athleticism, and that's scary from a physical freak like him.

 

How good would be be if we had Hakeem, Jordan and Bird?

 

Uhhh...... Seriously dude.... come on????

This is like asking how much better the 95 Rockets would have been if they had Michael Jordan instead of Clyde Drexler.

Yes, Michael was better than Drexler, but Drexler was still great.

Same with Lebron, and Harden.... discussion ended... move on.