treeman I can't believe no one picked up on this yet, but hey I am not a war buff so maybe my mind is just jumping to wild assumptions -- the last line in your first paragraph -- are you alluding to tactical nukes?
007...listen carefully...i never said that oil has NOTHING to do with this war...I believe it has very little, if anything to do with this war. I believe that had 9-11 never happened, we wouldn't be talking about this war. What I do know is the following: 1) You have watched Invisible Mind WAY too many times 2) You are certifiable 3) You may have either shaken hands with George Bush at some sort of fundraiser or something and now think you are an "insider" or perhaps you just own some old Texas Ranger memorabelia...i'm not sure.
I belive that Bush, while running for president, promised to take care of Saddam once elected. BTW, Bush won the election. ...
NJ, I like your posts, but in the sense that Iraq is related to terrorism is in the same sense as the US is. <hr>During the 1980s, the Reagan administration became mired in the Iran-Contra scandal following revelations that it illegally sold weapons to Iran and used the proceeds to covertly arm and fund Nicaraguan Contra forces attempting to overthrow the Sandinista government. <hr> When we pay for a coup, that is terrorism if we are not at war... (I hope my opinion has not offended any one.)
These are your words: We want oil and Saddam. For Bush to act like this is only about terrorism is absurd. I have never even heard about that movie. No, I have never spoken a word with our current president. I have never even seen him in person.
no worries -- which is he?? the scheming, shrewd conspiracy master?? or the idiot who can't think his way out of a paper bag?? i've seen you assert evidence to support both positions...
