<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Houston Astros announce they have traded infielder/outfielder Steve Pearce to the Yankees for cash. Call up OF Jimmy Paredes from OKC.</p>— Mark Berman (@MarkBermanFox26) <a href="https://twitter.com/MarkBermanFox26/status/240140579508482048" data-datetime="2012-08-27T17:35:50+00:00">August 27, 2012</a></blockquote> <script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Very nice. Pearce was about as expendable as they come and only taking up a spot that Paredes deserved.
Though I do not mind that Pearce is not longer with the team, I do not understand why the Astros went through the exercise to claim him on waivers less than a month ago. If they had even received a lesser 'prospect' in return it would have made a bit of sense..but as it is, cash out a month ago, cash in today. The cynic in me believes the true reason for the move was not in order to call up Paredes, but to create a spot on the 40 man for a local SP who has shown he can top out at 88 mph and, maybe, work through three innings (see also, 'the circus is coming to town').
Scott Moore's WAR = -0.9 Bogey's WAR = 0.4 They both suck balls offensively, but at least Bogey is solid defensively.
You mean Paredes? At least he isn't to blame. That is on the organization for waiting until a month ago to try and transition him to the OF.
was it cash out a month ago? Are you sure we didn't claim him off waivers for free, and then only pay his prorated salary for a month? And then trade him for cash, which likely exceeds that prorated salary since it's such a small amount? (or at worst would be equal) which would mean net 0 or + for giving him a quick tryout..
I don't think you have to pay cash to claim a player off waivers. I could be wrong. He might be talking about the cash the Astros paid in the Tyler Greene trade.